Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized confidence intervals for the process capability index C pm

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process capability indices have been proposed to the manufacturing industry for measuring process reproduction capability. The C pm index takes into account the degree of process targeting (centering), which essentially measures process performance based on average process loss. To properly and accurately estimate the capability index, numerous conventional approaches have been proposed to obtain lower limits of the classical confidence intervals (CLCLs) for providing process capability information. In particular, lower confidence limits (LCLs) not only provide critical information regarding process performance but are used to determine if an improvement was made in reducing the nonconforming percent and the process expected loss. However, the conventional approach lacks for exact confidence intervals for C pm involving unknown parameters which is a notable shortcoming. To remedy this, the method of generalized confidence intervals (GCIs) is proposed as an extension of classical confidence intervals (CCIs). For evaluating practical applications, two lower limits of generalized confidence intervals (GLCLs) for C pm using generalized pivotal quantities (GPQs) are considered, (i) to assess the minimum performance of one manufacturing process/one supplier, and (ii) to assess the smallest performance of several manufacturing processes/several suppliers for equal as well as unequal process variances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamec E, Burdick RK (2003) Confidence intervals for a discrimination ratio in a gauge R&R study with three random factors. Qual Eng 15:383–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyles RA (1991) The Taguchi capability index. J Qual Technol 23:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Burden R, Faires J (2004) Numerical analysis. 8th edn. Brooks/Cole, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1988) A new measure of process capability: C pm. J Qual Technol 20:162–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang YP, Huang WT (2000) Generalized confidence intervals for the largest value of some functions of parameters under normality. Stat Sin 5:805–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels L, Edgar B, Burdick RK, Hubele N (2005) Using confidence intervals to compare process capability indices. Qual Eng 17:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamada M, Weerahandi S (2000) Measurement system assessment via generalized inference. J Qual Technol 32(3):241–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang TC, Taguchi G (1985) A tutorial on quality control and assurance—the Taguchi methods. ASA Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18(1):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz S, Lovelace CR (1998) Process capability indices in theory and practice. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushler RH, Hurley P (1992) Confidence bounds for capability indices. J Qual Technol 24(4):188–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao CT, Lin TY, lyer HK (2005) One and two-sided tolerance intervals for general balanced mixed models and unbalanced one-way random model. Technometrics 47:323–335

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew T, Webb DW (2005) Generalized p values and confidence intervals for variance components: applications to army testing and evaluation. Technometrics 47:312–322

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL (1992) Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol 24(4):216–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearn WL, Shu MH (2003) Lower confidence bounds with sample size information of C pm applied to production yield assurance. Int J Prod Res 41(15):3581–3599

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Perakis M, Xekalaki E (2004) A new method for constructing confidence intervals for the index C pm. Qual Reliab Eng Int 20:651–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruczinski I (1996) The relation between C pm and the degree of includence. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

  • Vännman K (1995) A unified approach to capability indices. Stat Sin 5:805–820

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vännman K, Kotz S (1995) A superstructure of capability indices-distributional properties and implications. Scand J Stat 22:477–491

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weerahandi S (1993) Generalized confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 88:899–905, correct in (1994), 89:726

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerahandi S (1995) Exact statistical methods for data analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright PA (2000) The cumulative distribution of process capability index C pm. Stat Probab Lett 47: 249–251

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer LS, Hubele NF (1997) Quantiles of the sampling distribution of C pm. Qual Eng 10:309–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer LS, Hubele NF, Zimmer WJ (2001) Confidence intervals and sample size determination for C pm. Qual Reliab Eng Int 17:51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Hung Shu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsu, BM., Wu, CW. & Shu, MH. Generalized confidence intervals for the process capability index C pm . Metrika 68, 65–82 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-007-0143-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-007-0143-6

Keywords

Navigation