Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A review of univariate and multivariate process capability indices

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper offers a review of univariate and multivariate process capability indices (PCIs). PCIs are statistic indicators widely used in the industry to quantify the capability of production processes by relating the variability of the measures of the product characteristics with the admissible one. Univariate PCIs involve single-product characteristics while multivariate PCIs deal with the multivariate case. When analyzing the capability of processes, decision makers of the industry may choose one PCI among all the PCIs existing in the literature depending on different criteria. In this article, we describe, cluster, and discuss univariate and multivariate PCIs. To cluster the PCIs, we identify three classes of characteristics: in the first class, the characteristics related to the information of the process data input are included; the second class includes characteristics related to the approach used to calculate the PCIs; and in the third class, we find characteristics related to the information that the PCIs give. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each PCI using four criteria: calculation complexity, globality of the index, relation to proportion of nonconforming parts, and robustness of the index. Finally, we propose a framework that may help practitioners and decision makers of the industry to select PCIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lupo T (2015) The new Nino capability index for dynamic process capability analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(2):305–312. doi:10.1002/qre.1589

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Lepore A, Palumbo B (2015) New insights into the decisional use of process capability indices via hypothesis testing. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(8):1725–1741. doi:10.1002/qre.1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jose KK, Luke JA (2013) Comparing two process capability indices under balanced one-way random effect model. Qual Reliab Eng Int 29(2):165–172. doi:10.1002/qre.1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aslam M, Wu CW, Azam M, Jun CH (2014) Mixed acceptance sampling plans for product inspection using process capability index. Qual Eng 26(4):450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krolczyk JB, Krolczyk GM, Legutko S, Napiorkowski J, Hloch S, Foltys J, Tama E (2015) Material flow optimization—a case study in automotive industry. Tehnički vjesnik 22(6):1447– 1456

    Google Scholar 

  6. Legutko S (2009) Development trends in machines operation maintenance. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc-Maint Reliab 2:8–16

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taguchi G, Chowdhury S, Wu Y (2004) Taguchi’s quality engineering handbook. Wiley

  8. Oborski P (2014) Developments in integration of advanced monitoring systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75 (9-12):1613–1632. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6123-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stavropoulos P, Papacharalampopoulos A, Vasiliadis E, Chryssolouris G (2016) Tool wear predictability estimation in milling based on multi-sensorial data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(1-4):509–521. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7317-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ostasevicius V, Jurenas V, Augutis V, Gaidys R, Cesnavicius R, Kizauskiene L, Dundulis R (2016) Monitoring the condition of the cutting tool using self-powering wireless sensor technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–15. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-8939-z

  11. Kotz S, Johnson NL, Hubele NF, Spiring F, Cheng S, Yeung A, Leung B, Rodriguez R, Bothe D, Lu MW, Rudy RJ, Vannman K, Boyles RA, Ramberg JS (2002) Process capability indices: a review, 1992-2000. Discuss J Qual Technol 34(1):2–53

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu CW, Pearn WL, Kotz S (2009) An overview of theory and practice on process capability indices for quality assurance. Int J Prod Econ 117(2):338–359. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yum BJ, Kim KW (2011) A bibliography of the literature on process capability indices: 2000–2009. Qual Reliab Eng Int 27(3):251–268. doi:10.1002/qre.1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pan JN, Li CI, Chen FY (2014) Evaluating environmental performance using new process capability indices for autocorrelated data. Environ Monit Assess 186(10):6369–6384. doi:10.1007/s10661-014-3861-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan JN, Huang WKC (2015) Developing new multivariate process capability indices for autocorrelated data. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(3):431–444. doi:10.1002/qre.1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ebadi M, Amiri A (2012) Evaluation of process capability in multivariate simple linear profiles. Scientia Iranica 19(6):1960–1968. doi:10.1016/j.scient.2012.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang FK, Tamirat Y (2015) Process yield for multivariate linear profiles with one-sided specification limits. Qual Reliab Eng Int. doi:10.1002/qre.1834

  18. Guevara RD, Vargas JA (2016) Evaluation of process capability in multivariate nonlinear profiles. J Stat Comput Simul 86(12):2411–2428. doi:10.1080/00949655.2015.1112391

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18(1):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  20. Montgomery DC (1996) Introduction to statistical quality control. Wiley

  21. Sullivan LP (1985) Letters. Qual Progress 18:7–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tsai CC, Chen CC (2006) Making decision to evaluate process capability index Cp with fuzzy numbers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30(3-4):334–339. doi:10.1007/s00170-005-0052-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bothe DR (1999) Composite capability index for multiple product characteristics. Qual Eng 12(2):253–258. doi:10.1080/08982119908962582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1988) A new measure of process capability: Cpm. J Qual Technol 20(3):162–175. doi:10.1108/02656710110396076

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL (1992) Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol 24(4):216–231. doi:10.1080/03610929808832139

    Google Scholar 

  26. González I, Sánchez I (2009) Capability indices and nonconforming proportion in univariate and multivariate processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:1036–1050. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1907-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Veevers A (1998) Viability and capability indexes for multiresponse processes. J Appl Stat 25(4):545–558. doi:10.1080/02664769823016

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson T (1992) The relationship of Cpm to squared error loss. J Qual Technol 24(4):211–215

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tsui KL (1997) Interpretation of process capability indices and some alternatives. Qual Eng 9(4):587–596. doi:10.1080/08982119708919080

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Pearn WL, Chang YC, Wu CW (2006) Measuring process performance based on expected loss with asymmetric tolerances. J Appl Stat 33(10):1105–1120. doi:10.1080/02664760600746871

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdolshah M (2015) Measuring loss-based process capability index and its generation with fuzzy numbers. Math Prob Eng. doi:10.1155/2015/217406

  32. Eslamipoor R, Hosseini-nasab H (2016) A modified process capability index using loss function concept. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32(2):435–442. doi:10.1002/qre.1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zwick DS (1995) A hybrid method for fitting distribution data and its use in computing process capability indices. Qual Eng 7(3):601–613. doi:10.1080/08982119508918806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang J, Gang T, Cheng Y, Xie M (2015) Process capability indices based on the highest density interval. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(8):1327–1335. doi:10.1002/qre.1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Piña-Monarrez MR, Ortiz-Yañez JF, Rodríguez-Borbón MI (2015) Non-normal capability indices for the Weibull and lognormal distributions. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32(4):1321–1329. doi:10.1002/qre.1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hubele NF, Montgomery DC, Chih WH (1991) An application of statistical process control in jet-turbine engine component manufacturing. Qual Eng 4(2):197–210. doi:10.1080/08982119108918906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Plante RD (2001) Process capability: a criterion for optimizing multiple response product and process design. IIE Trans 33(6):497–509. doi:10.1080/07408170108936849

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ch’ng CK, Quah SH, Low HC (2005) Index C*pm in multiple response optimization. Qual Eng 17(1):165–171. doi:10.1081/QEN-200029001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ŝiman M (2014) Multivariate process capability indices: a directional approach. Commun Stat-Theory Methods 43(9):1949–1955. doi:10.1080/03610926.2012.677926

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang FK, Chen JC (1998) Capability index using principal components analysis. Qual Eng 11(1):21–27. doi:10.1080/08982119808919208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tong YL (2012) The multivariate normal distribution. Springer Science and Business Media

  42. Shinde RL, Khadse KG (2009) Multivariate process capability using principal component analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 25(1):69–77. doi:10.1007/s10182-011-0156-3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang FK, Du TCT (2000) Using principal component analysis in process performance for multivariate data. Int J Manag Sci 28(2):185–194. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00036-5

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jackson JE (1980) Principal components and factors analysis: part I—principal components. J Qual Technol 12(4):201–213

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang CH (2005) Constructing multivariate process capability indices for short-run production. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(11-12):1306–1311. doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2397-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Perakis M, Xekalaki E (2011) On the implementation of the principal component analysis-based approach in measuring process capability. Qual Reliab Eng Int 28(4):467–480. doi:10.1002/qre.1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tano I, Vännman K (2013) A multivariate process capability index based on the first principal component only. Qual Reliab Eng Int 29(7):987–1003. doi:10.1002/qre.1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dharmasena LS, Zeephongsekul P (2015) A new process capability index for multiple quality characteristics based on principal components. Int J Prod Res 2015:1–17. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1091520

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chen H (1994) A multivariate process capability index over a rectangular solid tolerance zone. Stat Sin 1994:749–758

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Das N, Dwivedi PS (2013) Multivariate process capability index: a review and some results. Econo Qual Control 28(2):151–166. doi:10.1515/eqc-2013-0022

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Ciupke K (2015) Multivariate process capability vector based on one-sided model. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31 (2):313–327. doi:10.1002/qre.1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1991) A multivariate measure of process capability. Int J Model Simul 11(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  53. Taam W, Subbaiah P, Liddy JW (1993) A note on multivariate capability indices. J Appl Stat 20(3):339–351. doi:10.1080/02664769300000035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Braun L (2001) New methods in multivariate statistical process control. Diskussionsbeiträge des Fachgebietes Unternehmensforschung. Stuttgart. Universität Hohenheim

  55. Shaoxi W, Mingxin W, Xiaoya F, Shengbing Z, Ru H (2013) A multivariate process capability index with a spatial coefficient. J Semicond 34(2). doi:10.1088/1674-4926/34/2/026001

  56. Pan J, Lee C (2010) New capability indices for evaluating the performance of multivariate manufacturing processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int 26(1):3–15. doi:10.1002/qre.1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pan JN, Li CI, Shih WC (2016) New multivariate process capability indices for measuring the performance of multivariate processes subject to non-normal distributions. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 33(1):42–61. doi:10.1108/IJQRM-12-2013-0195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Jalili M, Bashiri M, Amiri A (2012) A new multivariate process capability index under both unilateral and bilateral quality characteristics. Qual Reliab Eng Int 28(8):925–941. doi:10.1002/qre.1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Castagliola P (1996) Evaluation of non-normal process capability indices using Burr’s distributions. Qual Eng 8(4):587–593. doi:10.1080/08982119608904669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Shahriari H, Hubele NF, Lawrence FP (1995) A multivariate process capability vector. In: Industrial engineering research conference proceedings. Nashville, Tennessee

    Google Scholar 

  61. Niavarani MR, Noorossana R, Abbasi B (2012) Three new multivariate process capability indices. Commun Stat Theory Methods 41(2):341–356. doi:10.1080/03610926.2010.526743

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Grau D (2007) Multivariate capability indices for processes with asymmetric tolerances. Qual Technol Quant Manage 4(4):471–488. doi:10.1080/16843703.2007.11673166

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. Pearn WL, Shiau JJH, Tai YT, Li M Y (2011) Capability assessment for processes with multiple characteristics: a generalization of the popular index Cpk. Qual Reliab Eng Int 27(8):1119–1129. doi:10.1002/qre.1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Castagliola P, García Castellanos JV (2005) Capability indices dedicated to the two characteristics case. Qual Technol Quant Manag 2(2):201–220. doi:10.1108/13552510810861969

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  65. Shiau J, Yen C, Pearn WL, Lee W (2013) Yield-related process capability indices for processes of multiple quality characteristics. Qual Reliab Eng Int 29(4):487–507. doi:10.1002/qre.1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Abbasi B, Niaki STA (2010) Estimating process capability indices of multivariate nonnormal processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50(5-8):823–830. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2557-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Gu K, Jia X, Liu H, You H (2015) Yield-based capability index for evaluating the performance of multivariate manufacturing process. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(3):419–430. doi:10.1002/qre.1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. de-Felipe D, Klee T, Folmer J, Benedito E, Vogel-Heuser V (2016) A multivariate process capability index that complies with industry requirements. In: Conference of IEEE industrial electronics society (IECON). doi:10.1109/IECON.2016.7793509

  69. Chatterjee M, Chakraborty AK (2014) Exact relationship of C“pk with proportion of nonconformance and some other properties of C“p (u, v). Qual Reliab Eng Int 30(7):1023–1034. doi:10.1002/qre.1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Dianda DF, Quaglino MB, Pagura JA (2015) Performance of multivariate process capability indices under normal and non-normal distributions. Qual Reliab Eng Int. doi:10.1002/qre.1939

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, BMW AG, Munich, Germany

    David de-Felipe

  2. Department of Management and Institute of Industrial and Control Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain

    Ernest Benedito

Authors
  1. David de-Felipe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ernest Benedito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David de-Felipe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de-Felipe, D., Benedito, E. A review of univariate and multivariate process capability indices. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92, 1687–1705 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0273-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0273-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation