Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE:3D printing of surface characterisation and finite element analysis improvement of PEEK-HAP-GO in bone implant

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 21 June 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Research and development of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites with high thermal conductivities and ideal thermal stabilities have become one of the hot topics in composites. However, not all PEEK composites have the necessary characteristics adequate fracture toughness to resist forces and crack propagation, with an improved mechanical and structural properties. This research evaluates a novel computational surface characterisation and finite element analysis (FEA) of polyetheretherketone and hydroxyapatite graphene oxide (PEEK-HAP-GO) in the process of 3D printing to improve fracture toughness to resist forces and crack propagation. It also focuses on increasing the hydrophilicity, surface roughness, and coating osteoconductive of PEEK-HAP-GO for the bone implant. Compression and tensile tests were performed to investigate the mechanical properties of the PEEK-HAP-GO structure. The addition of calcium phosphate and the incorporation of porosity in PEEK-HAP-GO has been identified as an effective way to improve the osseointegration of bone-implant interfaces of PEEK-HAP-GO. The further analytical structure of the particle was performed, evaluating the surface luminance structure and the profile structure of composite material in 3D printing, analysing the profile curve of the nanostructure from the scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results of the uniaxial compression tests in new PEEK-HAP-GO biodegradable materials show good compressive strength suitable for loading applications. It shows melt-blending with bioactive nanoparticles can be used to produce bioactive nanocomposites like HAP-GO and is used to modify the surface structure of PEEK implants in order to make it more bioactive.

.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Ma R, Tang S, Tan H, Lin W, Wang Y, Wei J, Zhao L, Tang T (2014) Preparation, characterization, and in vitro osteoblast functions of a nano-hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone biocomposite as orthopedic implant material. Int J Nanomedicine 9:3949–3961

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deng Y, Liu X, Xu A, Wang L, Luo Z, Zheng Y, Deng F, Wei J, Tang Z, Wei S (2015) Effect of surface roughness on osteogenesis in vitro and osseointegration in vivo of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite composite. Int J Nanomedicine 10:1425–1447

    Google Scholar 

  3. Converse GL, Conrad TL, Roeder RK (2009) Mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite whisker reinforced polyetherketoneketone composite scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2:627–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Vahidnia F, Ikumapayi OM, Farooq MU Three-dimensional finite element analysis of a porcelain crowned tooth. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 7(4):461–464

  5. Abu Bakar MS, Cheang P, Khor KA (2003a) Mech. propt. of injection molded HA-PEEK biocompos. Compos Sci Technol 63:421–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peng S, Feng P, Wu P, Huang W, Yang Y, Wang G, Gao C, Shuai C (2017) Graphene oxide as an interface phase between polyetheretherketone and hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffolds. Sci Rep 7, Article number: 46604

  7. Abu Bakar, M.S.; Cheang, P.; Khor, K.A. Tensile properties and microstructural analysis of spheroidizedhydroxyapatite–poly (etheretherketone) biocomposites.Mater. Sci. Eng. A2003,345, 55–63.

  8. Daniyan IA, Adeodu AO, Oladapo BI, Daniyan OL, Ajetomobi OR Development of a reconfigurable fixture for low weight machining operations. Cogent Eng 6(1):1579455

  9. Converse GL, Yue W, Roeder RK (2007) Processing and tensile propt. of HA-whisker-reinforced PEEK. Biomaterials 28:927–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Li, SA. Zahedi, V. Silberschmidt, “Numerical Simulation of Bone Cutting: Hybrid SPH-FE Approach, Numerical Methods and Advanced Simulation in Biomechanics and Biological Processes (2017), 187–201

  11. Oladapo BI, Vincent BA, Oke AO, Agbor EA Design and finite element analysis on car seat height screw adjuster using autodesk inventor. Int J Sci Res Eng Stud (IJSRES) 2(8)

  12. Liravi F, Toyserkani E (2017) A hybrid additive manufacturing method for the fabrication of silicone bio-structures: 3D printing optimization and surface characterization. Mater Des 138:46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaekel DJ, Macdonald DW, Kurtz SM (2011) Characterization of PEEK Bioms using the small punch test. JMBBM 4:1275–1282

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jarman-Smith M et al (2012) Chapter 12 – porosity in PEEK. In: Kurtz SM (ed) PEEK Bioms handbook. WAP, Oxford, pp 181–199

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurtz SM, Devine JN (2007) PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28:4845–4869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lovald S, Kurtz SM (2012) Chapter 15 – applications of PEEK in trauma, arthroscopy, and cranial defect repair. In: Kurtz SM (ed) PEEK Biomaterials handbook. WAP, Oxford, pp 243–260

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rae PJ, Brown EN, Orler EB (2007) The Mech. propt. of PEEK with emphasis on the large compr strain response. Polymer 48:598–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt M, Pohle D, Rechtenwald T (2007) SLS of PEEK. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56:205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ijagbemi CO, Oladapo BI, Campbell HM, Ijagbemi CO (2016) Design and simulation of fatigue analysis for a vehicle suspension system (VSS) and its effect on global warming. Process Eng 159(2016):124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurtz SM (2012) Chapter 2-syntis and proc PEEK for surgical implant. In: PEEK biomaterials handbook. WAP, Oxford, p 9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Green SM, Schlegel J (2001) A PEEK Biom for use in medical implant. Applications RTLSB, U.K., pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ladapo BI (2015) Computer aided drafting and construction of standard drafting table for college of engineering studio in afe babalola university. Int J Sci Eng Res 6(8)

  23. Melkerson M, Kirkpatrick J, Griffith S (2003) Spinal implant: are we evaluating them appropriately? ASTM

  24. Chen RK, Lo TT, Chen L, Shih AJ (2015) Nano-CT charact. of struct. voids and air bubbles in FDM for AM. In: ASME, vol 1. IMSEC Processing, 2015

  25. Afolabi SO, Oladapo BI, Ijagbemi CO, Adeoye AOM, Kayode JF (2018) Design and finite element analysis of a fatigue lifeprediction for safe and economical machine shaft. J Mater Res Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.10.007

  26. Singha S, Singh R (2016) Development of functionally graded material by fused deposition modelling assisted investment casting. J Manuf Process 24:38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Balogun VA, Oladapo BI Electrical energy demand modeling of 3D printing technology for sustainable manufacture. Int J Eng 29(7):1–8

  28. Sung-Hoon A, Michael M, Dan O, Shad R, Paul KW (2002) Anisotropic material propt. of FDM ABS. Rapid Prototyp J 8:248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sobieraj MC, Rimnac CM (2012) Chapter 5-fracture, fatigue, and notch behavior of PEEK. In: Kurtz SM (ed) PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. WAP, Oxford, p 61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Jaekel D, Medel FJ, Kurtz SM (2019) Validation of Crystallinity Measurements of Medical Grade PEEK Using Specular Reflectance FTIR-microscopy. ANTEC 5:2511–2516

    Google Scholar 

  31. Oladapo BI, Adeoye AOM, Ismail M Analytical optimization of a nanoparticle of microstructural fused deposition of resins for additive manufacturing. Compos B Eng 150:248–254

  32. Pan Y, Shen Q, Chen Y (2013) Fabric and charact of functional gradient HA reinforced PEEK biocompos. Micro Nano Lett 8:357–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roeder RK, Conrad TL (2012) Chapter 11—Bioa. PEEK Compos. In: PEEK biomaterials handbook. WAP, Oxford, pp 163–179

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Jarman-Smith M, Brady M, Kurtz SM, Cordaro NM, Walsh WR (2012) Chapter 12—Porosity in PEEK. In: PEEK Bioms Handbook. WAP, Oxford, pp 181–199

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Schmidt M, Pohle D, Rechtenwald T (2007) SLS of PEEK. CIRP Annals – MT 56:205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Adeoye AOM 3D printing of bone scaffolds with hybrid biomaterials. Compos B Eng 158:428–436

  37. Rathke A, Balz U, Muche R, Haller B (2016) Effects of self-curing activator and curing protocol on the bond strength of composite core buildups. J Adhesive Dent 14:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ijagbemi CO, Oladapo BI, Campbell HM, Ijagbemi CO Design and simulation of fatigue analysis for a vehicle suspension system (VSS) and its effect on global warming. Procedia Eng 159:124–132

  39. Sithiprumnea D, Luca F, Alessandro P (2016) Fused deposition modelling with ABS–graphene nanocomposites. Compos Part A 85:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Omigbodun FT, Oshin EA, Adebiyi VA, Malachi OB (2019) Microstructural evaluation of aluminium alloy A365 T6 in machining operation. J Mater Res Technol 8(3):3213–3222

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project is funded by the Higher Education Innovation Fund (HEIF) of De Montfort University 2018–2019, UK: Research Project No.0043.06

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

    Bankole I. Oladapo, S. Abolfazl Zahedi, Seng Chong & Francis T. Omigbodun

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ekiti StateUniversity, Ado-Ekit, Nigeria

    Idowu O. Malachi

Authors
  1. Bankole I. Oladapo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Abolfazl Zahedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seng Chong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francis T. Omigbodun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Idowu O. Malachi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bankole I. Oladapo.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07434-3"

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oladapo, B.I., Zahedi, S.A., Chong, S. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE:3D printing of surface characterisation and finite element analysis improvement of PEEK-HAP-GO in bone implant. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106, 829–841 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04618-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04618-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation