Skip to main content
Log in

A study of mask planning in projection-based stereolithography using digital image correlation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of mask-image-projection-based stereolithography process (MIP-SL) in additive manufacturing (AM)for 3D printing of bio-scaffold materials is becoming more widespread. In general, mask optimization, frame compensation, and resin material performance improvement were adopted to improve the curing accuracy of resin in MIP-SL process. In this paper, a mask optimization scheme based on image segmentation technology is developed, where the mask is divided into multiple little squares, hexagons, and triangles. The large-area warping deformation in MIP-SL is therefore transformed to a multiple small area distortion. Digital image correlation (DIC) method is applied to measure the effect of using mask image planning in bio-scaffolds MIP-SL process. A platform of bio-scaffolds resin shrinkage measurement based on DIC method was built to measure the resin deformation under distinct mask image planning. The results show that the deformation of the bio-scaffolds resin during the light-cured process will increase sharply at first and then tend to decrease partially. In addition, shrinkage of square segmentation and hexagon segmentation are reduced by 33% and 27%, respectively. However, the shrinkage of triangle segmentation is hardly reduced because the required time is twice as that of the other two methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ma PX (2004) Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Mater Today 7:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-7021(04)00233-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen L, He Y, Yang Y, Niu S, Ren H (2016) The research status and development trend of additive manufacturing technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:3651–3660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9335-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Espalin D, Muse DW, MacDonald E, Wicker RB (2014) 3D printing multifunctionality: structures with electronics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72:963–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5717-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2012) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Melchels FPW, Domingos MAN, Klein TJ, Malda J, Bartolo PJ, Hutmacher DW (2012) Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Prog Polym Sci 37:1079–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2015) Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gauvin R, Chen YC, Lee JW, Soman P, Zorlutuna P, Nichol JW, Bae H, Chen S, Khademhosseini A (2012) Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. Biomaterials 33:3824–3834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang YM, Jiang CP (2003) Curl distortion analysis during photopolymerisation of stereolithography using dynamic finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:586–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-002-1317-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soman P, Chung PH, Zhang AP, Chen S (2013) Digital microfabrication of user-defined 3D microstructures in cell-laden hydrogels. Biotechnol Bioeng 110:3038–3047. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang AP, Qu X, Soman P, Hribar KC, Lee JW, Chen S, He S (2012) Rapid fabrication of complex 3D extracellular microenvironments by dynamic optical projection stereolithography. Adv Mater 24:4266–4270. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma 201202024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cha C, Soman P, Zhu W, Nikkhah M, Camci-Unal G, Chen S, Khademhosseini A (2014) Structural reinforcement of cell-laden hydrogels with microfabricated three dimensional scaffolds. Biomater Sci 2:703–709. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3BM60210A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jariwala AS, Bourell D, Ding F, Boddapati A, Breedveld V, Grover MA, Henderson CL, Rosen DW (2011) Modeling effects of oxygen inhibition in mask-based stereolithography. RAPID PROTOTYPING J 17:168–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541111124734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun C, Fang N, Wu DM, Zhang X (2005) Projection micro-stereolithography using digital micro-mirror dynamic mask. Sensors Actuators A Phys 121:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2004.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang YM, Kuriyama S, Jiang CP (2004) Fundamental study and theoretical analysis in a constrained-surface stereolithography system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:361–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1627-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Onuh SO, Hon KKB (2001) Improving stereolithography part accuracy for industrial applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700170210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu K, Kwok TH, Zhao ZC, Chen Y (2017) A reverse compensation framework for shape deformation control in additive manufacturing. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 17(9):021012. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu K, Chen Y (2015) Mask image planning for deformation control in projection-based stereolithography process. J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 137:12. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029802

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang YM, Jiang CP (2003) Numerical analysis of a mask type stereolithography process using a dynamic finite-element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:649–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-002-1388-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang YM, Lan HY (2006) Compensation of distortion in the bottom exposure of stereolithography process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:1101–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2313-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang CP, Huang YM, Liu CH (2006) Dynamic finite element analysis of photopolymerization in stereolithography. RAPID PROTOTYPING J 12:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610670753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Watts DC (2005) Reaction kinetics and mechanics in photo-polymerised networks. Dent Mater 21:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakaguchi RL, Wiltbank BD, Shah NC (2004) Critical configuration analysis of four methods for measuring polymerization shrinkage strain of composites. Dent Mater 20:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Fok AS, Satterthwaite J, Watts DC (2009) Measurement of the full-field polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of dental composites using digital image correlation. Dent Mater 25:582–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu K, Li X, Ge Y, Ruan S (2018) Determination of tubular material parameters in bulging test with three-dimensional digital image correlation method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:2091–2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1598-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chuang SF, Chang CH, Chen TY (2011) Spatially resolved assessments of composite shrinkage in MOD restorations using a digital-image-correlation technique. Dent Mater 27:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lau A, Li J, Heo YC, Fok A (2015) A study of polymerization shrinkage kinetics using digital image correlation. Dent Mater 31:391–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chuang SF, Chen TY, Chang CH (2008) Application of digital image correlation method to study dental composite shrinkage. Strain 44:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00403.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Blaber J, Adair B, Antoniou A (2015) Ncorr: open-source 2D digital image correlation Matlab software. Exp Mech 55:1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0009-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G (1999) Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00022-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51875214), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (No. 201804010452), and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2016A030311052).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wangyu Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Deng, T., Sun, D. et al. A study of mask planning in projection-based stereolithography using digital image correlation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104, 451–461 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03778-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03778-z

Keywords

Navigation