Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Significance of tool offset and copper interlayer during friction stir welding of aluminum to titanium

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation highlights the influence of tool offset on the microstructural evolution, phase formation, and hardness distribution during friction stir welding (FSW) of commercially pure aluminum (Al) to commercially pure titanium (Ti) with a copper (Cu) interlayer (200-μm thick). It was observed that tool offset position controls the mechanical mixing of materials in the weld nugget. The mechanical mixing also depends on the deformation, fragmentation, and distribution of each material in the weld nugget. The fragmentation of materials leads to the development of comparatively fine particles with variation in size and morphology. Insufficient mixing at higher tool offsets promotes the formation of root defects and produces inferior welds. On the other hand, when the tool offset is less than the optimum value, severe deformation and mechanical mixing lead to the formation of wormhole defects and evolution of intermetallic compounds in the weld. The spatial distribution of particles and intermetallics in the weld nugget leads to a large scatter in hardness values. Since mechanical mixing affects the morphology, phase evolution, and mechanical properties of the weld, tool offset is considered to be a very important parameter to be optimized for monitoring mechanical mixing and further development of the dissimilar weld with interlayer material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sujata M, Bhargava S, Sangal S (1997) On the formation of TiAl3 during reaction between solid Ti and liquid Al. J Mater Sci Lett 16(13):1175–1178. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018509026596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shouzheng W, Yajiang L, Juan W, Kun L, Pengfei Z (2014) Microstructure and joining mechanism of Ti/Al dissimilar joint by pulsed gas metal arc welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(5):1137–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5290-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y, Chen S, Li L (2008) Effects of heat input on microstructure and mechanical property of Al/Ti joints by rectangular spot laser welding-brazing method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(3):265–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1837-2

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shouzheng W, Yajiang L, Juan W, Kun L (2014) Improving of interfacial microstructure of Ti/Al joint during GTA welding by adopting pulsed current. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(9):1307–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5929-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen YC, Nakata K (2009) Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties in friction stir welding of aluminum and titanium dissimilar alloys. Mater Des 30(3):469–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kreimeyer M, Wagner F, Vollertsen F (2005) Laser processing of aluminum–titanium-tailored blanks. Opt Lasers Eng 43(9):1021–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2004.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Majumdar B, Galun R, Weisheit A, Mordike BL (1997) Formation of a crack-free joint between Ti alloy and Al alloy by using a high-power CO2 laser. J Mater Sci 32(23):6191–6200. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018620723793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dressler U, Biallas G, Alfaro Mercado U (2009) Friction stir welding of titanium alloy TiAl6V4 to aluminium alloy AA2024-T3. Mater Sci Eng A 526(1–2):113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Watanabe T, Takayama H, Yanagisawa A (2006) Joining of aluminum alloy to steel by friction stir welding. J Mater Process Technol 178(1):342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fuji A (2002) In situ observation of interlayer growth during heat treatment of friction weld joint between pure titanium and pure aluminium. Sci Technol Weld Join 7(6):413–416. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217102225006903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YC, Fuji A (2002) Factors dominating joint characteristics in Ti – Al friction welds. Sci Technol Weld Join 7(3):149–154. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217102225004185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuji A, Ikeuchi K, Sato YS, Kokawa H (2004) Interlayer growth at interfaces of Ti/Al–1%Mn, Ti/Al–4·6%Mg and Ti/pure Al friction weld joints by post-weld heat treatment. Sci Technol Weld Join 9(6):507–512. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217104225021797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilden J, Bergmann JP (2004) Manufacturing of titanium/aluminium and titanium/steel joints by means of diffusion welding. Weld Cut 56(5):285–290

    Google Scholar 

  14. Çam G, Koçak M, Dobi D, Heikinheimo L, Siren M (1997) Fracture behaviour of diffusion bonded bimaterial Ti–Al joints. Sci Technol Weld Join 2(3):95–101. https://doi.org/10.1179/stw.1997.2.3.95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kar A, Suwas S, Kailas SV (2018) Two-pass friction stir welding of aluminum alloy to titanium alloy: a simultaneous improvement in mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A 733:199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.07.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kar A, Devinder Y, Suwas S, Kailas SV (2016) A study of deformation and microstructural evolution in friction stir welding of aluminum and titanium. Trends Weld Res S39-1:728–731

    Google Scholar 

  17. Çam G, İpekoğlu G (2017) Recent developments in joining of aluminum alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(5):1851–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9861-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Çam G, Mistikoglu S (2014) Recent developments in friction stir welding of Al-alloys. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1936–1953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0968-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bozkurt Y, Salman S, Çam G (2013) Effect of welding parameters on lap shear tensile properties of dissimilar friction stir spot welded AA 5754-H22/2024-T3 joints. Sci Technol Weld Join 18(4):337–345. https://doi.org/10.1179/1362171813y.0000000111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang HJ, Wang M, Qi RL, Zhu Z, Zhang X, Yu T, Wu ZQ (2017) Effect of rotation speed on nugget structure and property of high rotation speed friction stir welded Al-Mn aluminum alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5–8):2401–2410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0295-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. İpekoğlu G, Erim S, Çam G (2014) Effects of temper condition and post weld heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir butt-welded AA7075 Al alloy plates. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(1):201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5255-8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mao Y, Ke L, Chen Y, Liu F, Xing L (2017) Improving local and global mechanical properties of friction stir welded thick AA7075-T6 joints by optimizing pin-tip profile. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5–8):1863–1875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8886-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Çam G (2011) Friction stir welded structural materials: beyond Al-alloys. Int Mater Rev 56(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.1179/095066010x12777205875750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mironov S, Onuma T, Sato YS, Yoneyama S, Kokawa H (2017) Tensile behavior of friction-stir welded AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 679:272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buffa G, Campanella D, Forcellese A, Fratini L, La Commare U, Simoncini M (2018) In-process control strategies for friction stir welding of AZ31 sheets with non-uniform thickness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(1–4):493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1223-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dorbane A, Ayoub G, Mansoor B, Hamade RF, Kridli G, Shabadi R, Imad A (2016) Microstructural observations and tensile fracture behavior of FSW twin roll cast AZ31 Mg sheets. Mater Sci Eng A 649:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Küçükömeroğlu T, Şentürk E, Kara L, İpekoğlu G, Çam G (2016) Microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir welded nickel-aluminum bronze (NAB) alloy. J Mater Eng Perform 25(1):320–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-015-1838-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Çam G, Serindağ HT, Çakan A, Mistikoglu S, Yavuz H (2008) The effect of weld parameters on friction stir welding of brass plates. Mater Werkst 39(6):394–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.200800314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gao Y, Morisada Y, Fujii H, Liao J (2018) Dissimilar friction stir lap welding of magnesium to aluminum using plasma electrolytic oxidation interlayer. Mater Sci Eng A 711:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Günen A, Kanca E, Demir M, Çavdar F, Mistikoğlu S, Çam G (2018) Microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir welded pure lead. Indian J Eng Mat Sci 25(1):26–32

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen Y-h, Ni Q, Ke L-m (2012) Interface characteristic of friction stir welding lap joints of Ti/Al dissimilar alloys. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22(2):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61174-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Aonuma M, Nakata K (2011) Dissimilar metal joining of 2024 and 7075 aluminium alloys to titanium alloys by friction stir welding. Mater Trans 52(5):948–952. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.L-MZ201102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bang H, Bang H, Song H, Joo S (2013) Joint properties of dissimilar Al6061-T6 aluminum alloy/Ti–6%Al–4%V titanium alloy by gas tungsten arc welding assisted hybrid friction stir welding. Mater Des 51:544–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Aonuma M, Nakata K (2010) Effect of calcium on intermetallic compound layer at interface of calcium added magnesium–aluminum alloy and titanium joint by friction stir welding. Mater Sci Eng B 173(1–3):135–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2009.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wei Y, Li J, Xiong J, Huang F, Zhang F, Raza SH (2012) Joining aluminum to titanium alloy by friction stir lap welding with cutting pin. Mater Charact 71:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2012.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cole EG, Fehrenbacher A, Duffie NA, Zinn MR, Pfefferkorn FE, Ferrier NJ (2014) Weld temperature effects during friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminum alloys 6061-t6 and 7075-t6. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(1):643–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5485-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rajakumar S, Muralidharan C, Balasubramanian V (2011) Statistical analysis to predict grain size and hardness of the weld nugget of friction-stir-welded AA6061-T6 aluminium alloy joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57(1):151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3279-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dixit S, MH C, Kailas SV, Chattopadhyay K (2017) Role of insert material on process loads during FSW. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9):3427–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9974-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kar A, Suwas S, Kailas SV (2017) An investigation on friction stir welding of aluminum to titanium using a nickel interlayer. Conference proceedings: Indian Institute of Welding-International Congress C051: 261–266

  40. Abdollah-Zadeh A, Saeid T, Sazgari B (2008) Microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir welded aluminum/copper lap joints. J Alloys Compd 460(1):535–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Barekatain H, Kazeminezhad M, Kokabi AH (2014) Microstructure and mechanical properties in dissimilar butt friction stir welding of severely plastic deformed aluminum AA 1050 and commercially pure copper sheets. J Mat Sci Technol 30(8):826–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2013.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim S-Y, Jung S-B, Shur C-C, Yeon Y-M, Kim D-U (2003) Mechanical properties of copper to titanium joined by friction welding. J Mater Sci 38(6):1281–1287. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022890611264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xue P, Xiao BL, Ni DR, Ma ZY (2010) Enhanced mechanical properties of friction stir welded dissimilar Al–Cu joint by intermetallic compounds. Mater Sci Eng A 527(21–22):5723–5727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.05.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ouyang JH, Kovacevic R (2002) Material flow and microstructure in the friction stir butt welds of the same and dissimilar aluminum alloys. J Mater Eng Perform 11(1):51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-002-0008-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Song Z, Nakata K, Wu A, Liao J, Zhou L (2014) Influence of probe offset distance on interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir butt welded joint of Ti6Al4V and A6061 dissimilar alloys. Mater Des 57:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Çam G, İpekoğlu G, Tarık Serindağ H (2014) Effects of use of higher strength interlayer and external cooling on properties of friction stir welded AA6061-T6 joints. Sci Technol Weld Join 19(8):715–720. https://doi.org/10.1179/1362171814y.0000000247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xu RZ, Ni DR, Yang Q, Liu CZ, Ma ZY (2015) Influence of Zn interlayer addition on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded AZ31 Mg alloy. J Mater Sci 50(12):4160–4173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8841-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nadammal N, Kailas SV, Suwas S (2015) A bottom-up approach for optimization of friction stir processing parameters; a study on aluminium 2024-T3 alloy. Mat Des (1980–2015) 65:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.005

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chen S, Yang D, Li M, Zhang Y, Huang J, Yang J, Zhao X (2016) Laser penetration welding of an overlap titanium-on-aluminum configuration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(9):3069–3079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8732-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gao X-L, Liu J, Zhang L-J (2018) Effect of heat input on microstructure and mechanical properties of pulsed laser welded joints in Ti6Al4V/Nb dissimilar alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9):3937–3947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1134-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rajakumar S, Balasubramanian V (2016) Diffusion bonding of titanium and AA 7075 aluminum alloy dissimilar joints—process modeling and optimization using desirability approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(1):1095–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8223-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhu Z, Lee KY, Wang X (2012) Ultrasonic welding of dissimilar metals, AA6061 and Ti6Al4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59(5):569–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3534-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhou L, Min J, He WX, Huang YX, Song XG (2018) Effect of welding time on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Ti ultrasonic spot welds. J Manuf Process 33:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Plaine AH, Suhuddin UFH, Alcântara NG, dos Santos JF (2017) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of friction spot welded AA6181-T4/Ti6Al4V dissimilar joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(9):3703–3714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0439-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wei Y, Li J, Xiong J, Zhang F (2016) Investigation of interdiffusion and intermetallic compounds in Al–Cu joint produced by continuous drive friction welding. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19(1):90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2015.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kattner UR, Lin J-C, Chang YA (1992) Thermodynamic assessment and calculation of the Ti-Al system. Metall Trans A 23(8):2081–2090. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02646001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wei Y, Aiping W, Guisheng Z, Jialie R (2008) Formation process of the bonding joint in Ti/Al diffusion bonding. Mater Sci Eng A 480(1–2):456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.07.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Institute X-ray facility and Advanced Facility for Microscopy and Microanalysis (AFMM) at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, for providing the facilities.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Department of Science and Technology (DST), and Ministry of Human Resources Development (MHRD), India, for the support and research funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, 560012, India

    Amlan Kar & Satish V. Kailas

  2. Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, 560012, India

    Satyam Suwas

Authors
  1. Amlan Kar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Satyam Suwas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Satish V. Kailas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amlan Kar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kar, A., Suwas, S. & Kailas, S.V. Significance of tool offset and copper interlayer during friction stir welding of aluminum to titanium. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100, 435–443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2682-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2682-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation