Skip to main content
Log in

Design and development of an extrusion system for 3D printing biopolymer pellets

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extrusion system is an integral part of any fused deposition style 3D printing technique. However, the extruder designs found in commercial and hobbyist printers are mostly suitable for materials in filament form. While printing with a filament is not a problem per se, the printing of materials that may not be readily available in the filament form or not commercially viable remains untapped, e.g., biopolymers and material blends. This is particularly an issue in the research and hobbyist space where the capability of printing a variety of materials or materials recycled from already printed parts may be of utmost importance. This paper presents a pellet-based extrusion system for the 3D printing of biopolymers. The system has been designed from the first principles and therefore can be extended to other materials with parameter adjustments or slight hardware modifications. A robust mechatronic design has been realized using an unconventional yet simplistic approach. The extrusion system uses a series of control factors to generate a consistent output of material over the course of a print. The platform and surrounding processes are set up so that software can be used to define the printing parameters; this allows a simpler adaption to different materials. The utility of the extruder is demonstrated through extensive printing and testing of the printed parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwala MK, Jamalabad VR, Langrana NA, Safari A, Whalen PJ, Danforth SC (1996) Structural quality of parts processed by fused deposition. Rapid Prototyp J 2(4):4–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn D, Kweon JH, Kwon S, Song J, Lee S (2009) Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. J Mater Process Technol 209(15-16):5593–5600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bak D (2003) Rapid prototyping or rapid production? 3D printing processes move industry towards the latter. Assem Autom 23(4):340–345

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Béreaux Y, Charmeau JY, Moguedet M (2009) A simple model of throughput and pressure development for single screw. J Mater Process Technol 209(1):611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks BJ, Arif KM, Dirven S, Potgieter J (2017) Robot-assisted 3D printing of biopolymer thin shells. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(1–4):957–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Covas J, Costa P (2004) A miniature extrusion line for small scale processing studies. Polym Test 23(7):763–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crump SS (1992) Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. US Patent 5,121,329

  8. Dul S, Fambri L, Pegoretti A (2016) Fused deposition modelling with ABS–graphene nanocomposites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 85:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Durgun I, Ertan R (2014) Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gurrala PK, Regalla SP (2014) Part strength evolution with bonding between filaments in fused deposition modelling: this paper studies how coalescence of filaments contributes to the strength of final FDM part. Virtual and Physical Prototyping 9(3):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haigh JN, Dargaville TR, Dalton PD (2017) Additive manufacturing with polypropylene microfibers. Mater Sci Eng C 77:883–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunt EJ, Zhang C, Anzalone N, Pearce JM (2015) Polymer recycling codes for distributed manufacturing with 3-D printers. Resour Conserv Recycl 97:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kruth JP, Leu MC, Nakagawa T (1998) Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 47(2):525–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marlin (2017) Open source 3D printer firmware. https://github.com/MarlinFirmware/Marlin

  15. Pinho ED, Martins A, Araújo J, Reis R, Neves N (2009) Degradable particulate composite reinforced with nanofibres for biomedical applications. Acta biomaterialia 5(4):1104–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prince JD (2014) 3D printing: an industrial revolution. Journal of electronic resources in medical libraries 11(1):39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ranellucci A (2017) Slic3r g-code generator for 3D printers. https://github.com/alexrj/Slic3r

  18. RepRap (2017) Ramps 1.4. http://reprap.org/wiki/RAMPS1.4

  19. Salea A, Prathumwan R, Junpha J, Subannajui K (2017) Metal oxide semiconductor 3D printing: preparation of copper (ii) oxide by fused deposition modelling for multi-functional semiconducting applications. J Mater Chem C 5(19):4614–4620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schubert C, Van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA (2013) Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. British Journal of Ophthalmology pp bjophthalmol–2013

  21. Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Des 31(1):287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun Q, Rizvi G, Bellehumeur C, Gu P (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J 14(2):72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Turner BN, Gold SA (2015) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness. Rapid Prototyp J 21(3):250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tymrak B, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Valkenaers H, Vogeler F, Ferraris E, Voet A, Kruth JP (2013) A novel approach to additive manufacturing: screw extrusion 3D- printing. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on multi- material micro manufacture, Research Publishing, pp 235–238

  26. Wang J, Xie H, Weng Z, Senthil T, Wu L (2016) A novel approach to improve mechanical properties of parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Mater Des 105:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wong KV, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mechanical Engineering 2012

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Marie-Joo Le Guen for providing the materials and related expertise.

Funding

This research was part of the Extrusion Plus program led by Scion New Zealand and funded by the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment (MBIE) funding under High Value Manufacturing and Services (HVMS) Enabling Technologies investment contract.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid Mahmood Arif.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Whyman, S., Arif, K.M. & Potgieter, J. Design and development of an extrusion system for 3D printing biopolymer pellets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96, 3417–3428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1843-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1843-y

Keywords

Navigation