Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and optimization of alloy steel 20CrMnTi grinding process parameters based on experiment investigation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three kinds of cylindrical plunge-grinding experiments are conducted with CBN grinding wheel by single-factor method for the carburizing alloy steel 20CrMnTi to investigate surface quality parameters and grinding force with change of wheel speed, workpiece speed, and the depth of cut. It is clarified that how change trends and correlations among surface quality parameters, grinding force, and grinding process parameters are. Based on the experiment results, analytical models for surface roughness and grinding force are established, which make the multi-object grinding parameter optimization possible and can predict the roughness and grinding force. The alloy steel 20CrMnTi workpiece surface quality and grinding efficiency-oriented optimization are conducted by the Strengthen PARETO algorithm, which make the prediction error good enough with roughness error less than 2% and the removal rate per unit width \( {Q}_W^{\prime } \) 1% below. The Strengthen PARETO optimal predictive model proves to be effective and sufficient to solve the problem of surface quality and grinding efficiency-oriented optimization. The alloy steel grinding parameters meet the requirement of the roughness under the value 0.8 μm with high grinding efficiency in automobile industry for shaft parts and gear production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang Q, Ren X, Gao Y, Li Y, Zhao Y, Yao M (2005) Effect of carburization on residual stress field of 20CrMnTi specimen and its numerical simulation. Mater Sci Eng A 392(1-2):240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. You L, Liqun L, Lina S (2015) Effect of shot peening on the fatigue resistance of laser surface melted 20CrMnTi steel gear. Mater Sci Eng A629:8–15

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alagumurthi N, Palaniradja K, Soundararaja N (2007) Heat generation and heat transfer in cylindrical grinding process- a numerical study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34(5-6):474–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0619-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo C, Shi Z, Attia H, Mcintosh D (2007) Power and wheel wear for grinding nickel alloy with plated CBN wheels. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56:343–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meng-yang Q, Bang-yan Y, Xiong J, Ai-dong H (2013) Experimental investigation of residual stress distribution in pre-stress cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1-4):355–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4174-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozel T, Karpat Y (2005) Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. Int J Mach Tool Manu 45(4–5):467–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rao RV, Kalyankar VD (2014) Optimization of modern machining processes using advanced optimization techniques: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(5-8):1159–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5894-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stepien P (2009) A probabilistic model of the grinding process. Appl Math Model 33(10):3863–3884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.01.005

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Chen Y, Zhou G, Lv Q, Zhang Z, Yang W, Liu Y (2016) Roughness model for tooth surfaces of spiral bevel gears under grinding. Mech Mach Theory 104:17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar S, Choudhury SK (2007) Prediction of wear and surface roughness in electro-discharge diamond grinding. J Mater Process Technol 191(1-3):206–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aguiar PR, Cruz CED, Paula WCF (2007) Neural network approach for surface roughness prediction in surface grinding. In: Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pp. 96–101

  12. Elhami S, Razfar MR, Farahnakian M, Rasti A (2013) Application of GONNS to predict constrained optimum surface roughness in face milling of high-silicon austenitic stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(5–8):975–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4382-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prakasvudhisarn C, Kunnapapdeelert S, Yenradee P (2009) Optimal cutting condition determination for desired surface roughness in end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(5–6):440–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1491-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang JD, Wang LS, Li GF (2010) Prediction system of surface roughness based on LS-SVM in cylindrical longitudinal grinding. Opt Precis Eng 18:2407–2412

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang L (2009) Competitive parameter optimization of multi-quality CNC turning. J Adv Manuf Technol 41(7–8):820–826

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Q, Liu F, Wang X (2013) Multi-objective optimization of machining parameters considering energy consumption. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:1133–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mori M, Fujishima M, Inamasu Y, Oda Y (2011) A study on energy efficiency improvement for machine tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):145–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Na SS, Karr DG (2013) An efficient stiffness method for the optimum design of ship structures based on common structural rules. J Ships Offshore Struct 8(1):29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2012.669213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaehwan J, Soonho S, Hur KB (2017) Numerical study on the effects of intake valve timing on performance of a natural gas-diesel dual-fuel engine and multi-objective Pareto optimization. Appl Therm Eng 121:604–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cai J, Haiyan L, Wang R (2017) Pareto-optimal reinsurance arrangements under general model settings. Insur Math Econ 77:24–37

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Z, Wang K, Zhu L, Wang Y (2017) A Pareto improved artificial fish swarm algorithm for solving a multi-objective fuzzy disassembly line balancing problem. Expert Syst Appl 86:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar S, Gupta M, Satsangi PS (2015) Multiple-response optimization of cutting forces in turning of UD-GFRP composite using distance-based Pareto genetic algorithm approach. Eng Sci Technol Int J 18(2015):680–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2015.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Snoeyes R, Peters J, Decneut A (1974) The significance of chip thickness in grinding. Ann CRIP 23(2):227–280

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This paper is supported by “Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan” (Project number 16DZ0502200) and by Chinese National Natural Science Fund (No.51675096).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yawei Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Li, B., Yang, J. et al. Modeling and optimization of alloy steel 20CrMnTi grinding process parameters based on experiment investigation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95, 1859–1873 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1335-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1335-5

Keywords

Navigation