Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of GONNS to predict constrained optimum surface roughness in face milling of high-silicon austenitic stainless steel

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface roughness is a technical requirement for machined products and one of the main product quality specifications. In the present research, a genetically optimized neural network system (GONNS) is proposed for prediction of constrained optimal cutting conditions in face milling of a high-silicon austenitic stainless steel (UNS J93900) in order to minimize surface roughness. In order to attain minimum operation numbers and decrease the cost of machining, an experimental scheme was arranged by using Taguchi method. The considered parameters were cutting speed, feed, depth of cut, and engagement. Cutting force components and surface roughness were measured, and then analysis of variance is performed. The results show that the feed is the dominant factor affecting the surface roughness. Backpropagation artificial neural network was utilized to create predictive models of surface roughness and cutting forces exploiting the experimental data, and the genetic algorithm was employed to find the constrained optimum of surface roughness. Finally, in order to validate the method, an experiment with the obtained optimal cutting condition was carried out, and the results were compared with the predicted value of surface roughness. The corresponding results show the capability of GONNS to predict constrained surface roughness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASM metals handbook 1:78, 92, 111, 127, 225, 229

  2. Durcomet5 data sheet, U.S. patent 3.615.368, Flowserve Corporation

  3. Dumbleton JH, Douthett JA (1977) The unlubricated adhesive wear resistance of metastable austinitic stainless steels containing silicon. Wear 42:305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Çelik H, Kaplan M (2004) Effects of silicon on the wear behaviour of cobalt-based alloys at elevated temperature. Wear 257:606–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Halevi G, Weil RD (1995) Principles of process planning: a logical approach. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang B, Chen JC (2003) An in process neural network based surface roughness prediction (INN-SRP) system using a dynamometer in end milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:339–347

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohli A, Dixit US (2005) A neural network based methodology for the prediction of surface roughness in a turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dagnal MA (1986) Exploring surface texture. Rank, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ozcelik B, Oktem H, Kurtaran H (2005) Optimum surface roughness in end milling Inconel 718 by coupling neural network model and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:234–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vosniakos GC, Bernardos PG (2003) Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:833–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai YH, Chen JC, Lou SJ (1999) An in-process surface recognition system based on neural networks in end milling cutting operations. Int J Machine Tools Manu 39:583–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erzurumlu T, Oktem H (2007) Comparison of response surface model with neural network in determining the surface quality of moulded parts. Mater Design 28:459–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tansela IN (1990) Neural network approach for representation and simulation of 3D-cutting dynamics. Transact North Am Metal Res Ins S1:193–200

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tansel IN et al (2006) Selection of optimal cutting conditions by using GONNS. Int J Machine Tools Manu 46:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tansel IN et al (2009) Design of energy scavengers of structural health monitoring systems using genetically optimized neural network systems. Sensors Materials 21:141–153

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tansela IN, Ozcelikb B (2006) Selection of optimal cutting conditions by using GONNS. Mach Tools Manuf J 46:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krimpenis A, Fousekis A (2005) Assessment of sculptured surface milling strategies using design of experiments. Adv Manuf Technol J 25:444–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Omar OEEK, El-Wardany T, Ng E, Elbestawi MA (2007) An improved cutting force and surface topography prediction model in end milling. Mach Tools Manuf J 47:1263–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Razfar MR, Zanjani Zadeh MR (2009) Optimum damage and surface roughness prediction in end milling glass fiber-reinforced plastics, using neural network and genetic algorithm. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf 223:653–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. zanjanizade M, Razfar MR (2009) Optimum surface roughness prediction in face milling X20Cr13 by using a neural network and a genetic algorithm. Int J Math Stat 4:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jalili Saffar R, Razfar MR (2010) Simulation of end milling operation for predicting cutting forces to minimize tool deflection by genetic algorithm. Mach Sci Technol 1:14

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jalili Saffar R et al (2009) Optimization of machining parameters to minimize tool deflection in the end milling operation using genetic algorithm. World Appl Sci J 6:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  23. Homaifar A, Qi C, Lai S (1994) Constrained optimization via genetic algorithms. Simul Counc Inc 62:242–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Deb K (2000) An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Comput Methods Appl Methodol Eng 18:311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Michalewicz Z, Schoenauer M (1996) Evolutionary algorithms for constrained parameter optimization problems. Evol Comput 4:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson, J T, Palmer, M R, Liepins, G and Hilliard, M (1989) Some guidelines for genetic algorithms with penalty functions. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 191–197

  27. Huang, W-C, Kao, C-Y and Horng, J-T (1994) A genetic algorithm approach for set covering problem. Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 569–573

  28. Gen M, Cheng R (1996) A survey of penalty techniques in genetic algorithms. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Nagoya, pp 804–809

    Google Scholar 

  29. Farshbaf Zinati R, Razfar MR (2011) Constrain ed optimum surface roughness predict ion in turning of X20Cr13 by coupling g novel modified harmony search-based neural network and modified harmony search algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  30. Şanylmaz, M (2006) Design of experiment and an application for Taguchi method in quality improvement activity. [S.l.]: Dumlupınar University, Turkey

  31. Peace GS (1992) Taguchi methods, a hands-on approach. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dagnal MA (1986) Exploring surface texture. Rank Taylor Hobson, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sandvik Corporation (2009) Technical guide

  34. SECO group, online catalogue. http://ecat.secotools.com/

  35. Montgomery DC (1997) Design, analyses of experiments, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bäker M (2006) Finite element simulation of high-speed cutting forces. J Mater Proc Tech 176:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaczmarek J (1983) Principles of machining by cutting, abrasion and erosion. Peregrinus, London

    Google Scholar 

  38. Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2002) Prediction of surface roughness in CNC face milling using neural networks and tauguchi's design of experiments. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 18:343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Michalewicz Z (1996) Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Razfar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elhami, S., Razfar, M.R., Farahnakian, M. et al. Application of GONNS to predict constrained optimum surface roughness in face milling of high-silicon austenitic stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66, 975–986 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4382-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4382-y

Keyword

Navigation