Abstract
The recent development of new laser machine tools for the manufacture of micro-scale metallic components has boosted demand in the field of medical applications. However, the optimization of this process encounters a major problem: a knowledge gap concerning the relation between the controllable parameters of these machine tools and the quality of the machined components. Our research proposes a two-step strategy to approach this problem for the manufacture of stents. First, a screening test identifies good and bad performance conditions for the laser process and generates useful information on cutting performance; then, a stent is manufactured under different cutting conditions and the most accurate machine learning technique to model this process is identified. This strategy is validated with the performance of experiments that vary pulse duration, laser power, and cutting speed, and measure two geometrical characteristics of the stent geometry. The results showed that linear Support Vector Machines can identify good and bad cutting conditions, while Random Forest ensembles of regression trees can predict with high accuracy the two characteristics of the stent geometry under study. Besides, this technique can extract useful information from the screening test that improves its final accuracy. In view of the small dataset size, an alternative based on the leave-one-out technique was used, instead of standard cross validation, so as to assure the generalization capability of the models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tawari G, Sarin Sundar JK, Sundararajan G, Joshi SV (2005) Influence of process parameters during pulsed Nd:YAG laser cutting of nickel-base superalloys. J Mater Process Technol 170:229–239
K.F. Kleine, B. Whitney, K.G. Watkins (2002) Use of fiber lasers for micro cutting applications in medical device industry. 21st International Congress on Applications of Lasers and Electro-Optics
Muhammad N, Whitehead D, Boor A, Li L (2010) Precision machine design. Comparison of dry and wet fibre laser profile cutting of thin 316 L stainless steel tubes for medical device applications. J Mater Process Technol 210:2261–2267
Meng H, Liao J, Zhou Y, Zhang Q (2009) Laser micro-processing of cardiovascular stent with fiber laser cutting system. Optics Laser Technol 41:300–302
Baumeister M, Dickman K, Hoult T (2006) Fiber laser micro-cutting of stainless steel sheets. J Appl Phys A 85:121–124
Yan Y, Li L, Sezer K, Whitehead D, Ji L, Bao Y, Jiang Y (2011) Experimental and theoretical investigation of fibre laser crack-free cutting of thick-section alumina. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:859–870
Kathuria YP (2005) Laser microprocessing of metallic stent for medical therapy. J Mater Process Technol 170:545–550
Pfeifer R, Herzog D, Hustedt M, Barcikowski S (2010) Pulsed Nd:YAG laser cutting of NiTi shape memory alloys—influence of process parameters. J Mater Process Technol 210:1918–1925
Shanjin L, Yang W (2006) An investigation of pulsed laser cutting of titanium alloy sheet. Opt Lasers Eng 44:1067–1077
Muhammad N, Whitehead D, Boor A, Oppenlander W, Liu Z, Li L (2012) Picosecond laser micromachining of nitinol and platinum-iridium alloy for coronary stent applications. Appl Phys A 106:607–617
Lia C, Nikumbb S, Wong F (2006) An optimal process of femtosecond laser cutting of NiTi shape memory alloy for fabrication of miniature devices. Opt Lasers Eng 44:1078–1087
Huang H, Zheng HY, Lim GC (2004) Femtosecond laser machining characteristics of nitinol. Appl Surf Sci 228:201–206
Raval A, Choubey A, Engineer C, Kothwala D (2004) Development and assessment of 316LVM cardiovascular stents. Mater Sci Eng A 386:331–343
Scintilla LD, Tricarico L (2013) Experimental investigation on fiber and CO2 inert gas fusion cutting of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets. Optics Laser Technol 46:42–52
Desai CK, Shaikh A (2012) Prediction of depth of cut for single-pass laser micro-milling process using semi-analytical, ANN and GP approaches. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(9–12):865–882
Goyal R, Dubey AK, Upadhyay BN (2016) An intelligent approach to quality improvement in laser trepan drilling of inconel 718 superalloy. Lasers Eng 34(1–3):15–41
Karazi SM, Issa A, Brabazon D (2009) Comparison of ANN and DoE for the prediction of laser–machined micro-channel dimensions. Opt Lasers Eng 47:956–964
Yousef BF, Knopf GK, Bordatchev EV, Nikumb SK (2003) Neural network modeling and analysis of the material removal process during laser machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22(1–2):41–53
Teixidor D, Grzenda M, Bustillo A, Ciurana J (2015) Modeling pulsed laser micromachining of micro geometries using machine-learning techniques. J Intell Manuf 26(4):801–814. doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0835-x
Chandrasekaran M, Muralidhar M, Krishna C (2010) Dixit U “application of soft computing techniques in machining performance prediction and optimization: a literature review”. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(5):445–464
Bustillo A, Correa M (2012) Using artificial intelligence to predict surface roughness in deep drilling of steel components. J Intell Manuf 23(5):1893–1902
Bustillo A, Díez-Pastor JF, Quintana G, García-Osorio C (2011) Avoiding neural network fine tuning by using ensemble learning: application to ball-end milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57(5):521–532
Grzenda M, Bustillo A, Zawistowski P (2012) A soft computing system using intelligent imputation strategies for roughness prediction in deep drilling. J Intell Manuf 23(5):1733–1743
Grzenda M, Bustillo A, Quintana G, Ciurana J (2012) Improvement of surface roughness models for face milling operations through dimensionality reduction. Integr Comput-Aided Eng 19(2):179–197
Beruvides G, Castaño F, Quiza R, Haber RE (2016) Surface roughness modeling and optimization of tungsten-copper alloys in micro-milling processes. Meas: J Int Meas Confederation 86:246–252
Bustillo A, Ukar E, Rodriguez JJ, Lamikiz A (2011) Modelling of process parameters in laser polishing of steel components using ensembles of regression trees. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 24(8):735–747
Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2003) Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(8):833–844
Cicală E, Soveja A, Sallamand P, Grevey D, Jouvard JM (2008) The application of the random balance method in laser machining of metals. J Mater Process Technol 196(1–3):393–401
Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297
Altman NS (1992) An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am Stat 46(3):175–185
Drucker H, Surges CJC, Kaufman L, Smola A, Vapnik V (1996) Support vector regression machines, in advances in neural information processing systems, NIPS. MIT Press, USA, pp. 155–161
Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, New York
Mendes-Moreira J, Soares C, Jorge AM, De Sousa JF (2012) Ensemble approaches for regression: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 45(1) art. no. 10. doi:10.1145/2379776.2379786
Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24(2):123–140
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32
Pardo C, Diez-Pasor JF, Garcia-Osorio C, Rodriguez JJ (2013) Rotation forest for regression. Appl Math Comput 219(19):9914–9924
Breiman L (2001) Using iterated bagging to debias regressions. Mach Learn 45(3):261–277
Friedman JH (2002) Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput Stat Data Anal 38(4):367–378
Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2 (12). Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp 1137–1143
Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explorations 11(1):10–18
Witten I, Frank E, Hall M (2005) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, Morgan Kaufmann, 3rd edn
Elomaa T, Kääriäinen M (2001) An analysis of reduced error pruning. J Artif Intell Res 15:163–187
Nadeau C, Bengio Y (2003) Inference for the generalization error. Mach Learn 52(3):239–281
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maudes, J., Bustillo, A., Guerra, A.J. et al. Random Forest ensemble prediction of stent dimensions in microfabrication processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91, 879–893 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9695-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9695-9