Skip to main content
Log in

Error sensitivity analysis and precision distribution for multi-operation machining processes based on error propagation model

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The error control and distribution of multi-operational machining processes is an active and important research topic in manufacturing. Most of the recent studies focus on statistical methods and the robustness of the evaluating process. However, these studies mainly serve to provide a change prediction tool rather than a method to identify and control root causes of machining errors. In this paper, in order to effectively control and distribute products of high-quality precision, a method of integrating a stream of variations (SoV) and multi-objective optimization is proposed. First, a machining process decomposition method is introduced to identify the sources of error. The multi-operation machining process is divided into three levels: the operation level, the station level, and the key characteristics level. Second, the sensitivities of the machining operation are evaluated level by level based on the SoV model; results of this evaluation will be used to determine the maximum error sources affecting the quality of products. Third, a distribution technique for each quality precision is achieved by solving a multi-objective optimization problem to minimize the cost and error associated with the sensitivities. Finally, a machining instance containing four operations is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jin N, Zhou S (2006) Signature construction and matching for fault diagnosis in manufacturing processes through fault space analysis. IIE Trans 38(4):341–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Z, Zhou S (2006) Robust method of multiple variation sources identification in manufacturing processes for quality improvement. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng J Manuf Sci Eng 128(1):326

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu D, Jiang P, Zhang Y (2008) An e-quality control model for multistage machining processes of workpieces. Sci China Ser E Technol Sci 51(12):2178–2194

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie N, Chen L, Li A (2010) Fault diagnosis of multistage manufacturing systems based on rough set approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(9-12):1239–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawless J, Mackay R, Robinson J (1999) Analysis of variation transmission in manufacturing processes. J Qual Technol 31(2):131–154

    Google Scholar 

  6. Agrawal R, Lawless J, Mackay R (1999) Analysis of variation transmission in manufacturing processes: part II. J Qual Technol 31(2):143–154

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang M, Gossard DC (1998) Computational method for diagnosis of variation-related assembly problems. Int J Prod Res 36(11):2985–2995

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Danai K, Chin H (1991) Fault diagnosis with process uncertain. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 113:339–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu S, Wu SM (1992) Identifying root causes of variation in automobile body using principal component analysis. Trans NAMRI 20:311–316

    Google Scholar 

  10. Djurdjanovic D, Ni J (2001) Stream of variation based analysis and synthesis of measurement schemes in multi-station machining systems. Ann Arbor 1001:48109–2125

    Google Scholar 

  11. Djurdjanovic D, Ni J (2003) Bayesian approach to measurement scheme analysis in multistation machining systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 217(8):1117–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ding Y, Kim P, Ceglarek D (2003) Optimal sensor distribution for variation diagnosis in multistation assembly processes. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19(4):543–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abellan-Nebot JV, Liu J, Romero Subiron F (2012) Quality prediction and compensation in multi-station machining processes using sensor-based fixtures. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28:208–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abellán-Nebot JV, Romero Subirón F, Serrano Mira J (2013) Manufacturing variation models in multi-station machining systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:63–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang Q, Zhou N, Shi J (2000) Stream of variation modeling and diagnosis of multi-station machining processes. Ann Arbor 1001:48109–2117

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang Y (2000) Improvement of flatness error in milling plate-shaped workpiece by application of side-clamping force. J Int Soc Precis Eng Nanotechnol 24:364–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ceglarek D, Shi J (1995) Dimensional variation reduction for automotive body assembly. Manuf Rev 8(2):139–154

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ceglarek D, Shi J (1998) Design evaluation of sheet metal joints for dimensional integrity. J Manuf Sci Eng 120(2):452–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qin Y, Zhao L, Yao Y (2011) Multistage machining processes variation propagation analysis based on machining processes weighted network performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(5-8):487–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mantripragada R, Whitney DE (1999) Modeling and controlling variation propagation in mechanical assemblies using state transition models. Robot Autom IEEE Trans 15(1):124–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang Q, Zhou S, Shi J (2002) Diagnosis of multi-operational machining processes through variation propagation analysis. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 18(3):233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang Q, Shi J (2004) Variation transmission analysis and diagnosis of multi-operational machining processes. IIE Trans 36(9):807–815

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Shetwan AG, Vitanov VI, Tjahjono B (2011) Allocation of quality control stations in multistage manufacturing systems. Comput Ind Eng 60:473–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyan Zuo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuo, X., Li, B. & Yang, J. Error sensitivity analysis and precision distribution for multi-operation machining processes based on error propagation model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86, 269–280 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8154-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8154-3

Keywords

Navigation