Skip to main content
Log in

Fault diagnosis of multistage manufacturing systems based on rough set approach

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multistage manufacturing systems (MMS) have been investigated extensively. However, quality and dimensional problems are still one of the most important research topics, especially rapid diagnosis of dimensional failures is of critical concern. Due to the knowledge and experience intension nature of fault diagnosis, the diagnostic results depend on the preference of the decision makers on the hidden relations between possible faults and presented symptoms. In this paper, a rough set-based fault diagnosis method is proposed, and a rapid fault diagnosis system with rough set is developed. The novel approach uses rough sets theory as a knowledge extraction tool to deal with the data that are obtained from both sensors and statistical process control charts and then extracts a set of minimal diagnostic rules encoding the preference pattern of decision making by experts in the field. By means of knowledge acquisition, the machining process failures in MMS can then be identified. A practical system is presented to illustrate the efficiency and effectivity of our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang Q, Shi J (2004) Stream of variation modeling and analysis of serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems. J Manuf Sci Eng 126:611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu S, Koren Y (1997) Stream of variation theory for automotive body assembly. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 46(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang Q, Zhou S, Shi J (2002) Diagnosis of multi-operational machining processes through variation propagation analysis. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 18:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceglarek D, Huang W, Zhou S, Ding Y, Kumar R, Zhou Y (2004) Time-based competition in manufacturing: stream-of-variation analysis methodology-review. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 16(1):11–44

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang M, Djurdjanovic D, Ni J (2007) Diagnosibility and sensitivity analysis for multi-station machining processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(3–4):646–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barhak J, Djurdjanovic D, Spicer P, Katz R (2005) Integration of reconfigurable inspection with stream of variations methodology. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(4–5):407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Agapiou JS, Eric S, Gu F, Pulak B (2003) Modeling machining errors on a transfer line to predict quality. J Manuf Process 5(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo A (2000) Error compensation in machine tools—a revire part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:1235–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang WZ, Lin J, Kong Z, Ceglarek D (2007) Stream-of-varition(SOVA) modeling-part II:a generic 3D variation model for rigid body assembly in multistation assembly processes. J Manuf Sci Eng 129(8):832–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Q, Li J (2004) A rough set-based fault ranking prototype system for fault diagnosis. Eng Appl Artif Intell 17:909–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer, Dordrecht. ISBN 0-7923-1472-7

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak Z, Skowron A (2007) Rough sets and boolean reasoning. Inf Sci 177:41–73

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Pawlak Z, Skowron A (2007) Rough sets: some extensions. Inf Sci 177:28–40

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen L, Francis EH, Qu L, Shen Y (2000) Fault diagnosis using rough sets theory. Comput Ind 43:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khoo L, Tor SB, Li JR (2001) A rough set approach to the ordering of basic events in a fault tree for fault diagnosis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:769–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mannar K, Ceglarek D (2004) Continuous failure diagnosis for assembly systems using rough set approach. Ann CIRP 53:39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koutras MV, Bersimis S, Maravelakis PE (2007) Statistical process control using shewhart control charts with supplementary runs rules. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 9:207–224

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang G, Sun J (2003) Quality management. Higher Education Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pawlak Z, Grzymala J, Slowinski R, Ziarko W (1995) Rough sets. Commun ACM 38(11):88–95

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shen Q, Jensen R (2007) Rough sets, their extensions and applications. Int J Autom Comput 4(3):217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Francis EH, Shen L (2003) Faults diagnosis based on rough set theory. Eng Appl Artif Intell 16(1):39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Q (2001) Rough set and rough reasoning. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao Z, Peng Y (2003) Knowledge-based engineering design: theory, method and practice. Mech Sci Technol Aerosp Eng 22(1):151–153

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nan Xie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xie, N., Chen, L. & Li, A. Fault diagnosis of multistage manufacturing systems based on rough set approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48, 1239–1247 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2324-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2324-0

Keywords

Navigation