Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of residual stress and affected layer in Aermet100 steel grinding with alumina and cBN wheels

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residual stresses induced by finish machining processes have significant effect on fatigue strength of ultra-high strength steel in large structures. In this study, an experimental investigation was carried out to explore the residual stress and affected layer in grinding Aermet100 by using a resin bond white alumina (WA) wheel and cubic boron nitride (cBN) wheel, respectively. The grinding force and temperature were measured, and then the affected layer of residual stress, microhardness, and microstructure by a WA and a cBN wheel was obtained. The comparisons of surface residual stress studies and thermal–mechanical coupling mechanism on the affected layer were discussed in light of the current understanding of this subject. Experimental results show that grinding with cBN wheel can provide compressive residual stress and a smaller affected layer owing to its better thermal conductivity; the coupling effect of wheel speed and grinding depth plays a more significant role on surface residual stress; when grinding with parameters v w = 18 m/min, v s = 14 m/s, and a p = 0.01 mm, compressive residual stress and hardening effect appeared on ground surface, and the depth of residual stress layer is 40~50 μm; the depth of hardened layer is 30~40 μm and the depth of plastic deformation layer is 5~10 μm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ko TJ, Kim HS (2001) Surface integrity and machinability in intermittent hard turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18(3):168–175

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Javidi A, Rieger U, Eichlseder W (2008) The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life. Int J Fatigue 30:2050–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding WF, Xu JH, Chen ZZ, Su HH, Fu YC (2010) Grindability and surface integrity of cast nickel-based superalloy in creep feed grinding with brazed CBN abrasive wheels. Chin J Aeronaut 23:501–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yao CF, Jin QC, Huang XC, Wu DX, Ren JX, Zhang DH (2013) Research on surface integrity of grinding Inconel718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:1019–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sasahara H (2005) The effect on fatigue life of residual stress and surface hardness resulting from different cutting conditions of 0.45 % C steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vashista M, Kumar S, Ghosh A, Soumitra P (2010) Surface integrity in grinding medium carbon steel with miniature electroplated monolayer cBN wheel. J Mater Eng Perform 19:1248–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo YB, Sahni J (2004) A comparative study of hard turned and cylindrically ground white layers. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Umbrello D, Filice L (2009) Improving surface integrity in orthogonal machining of hardened AISI 52100 steel by modeling white and dark layers formation. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Umbrello D, Outeiro JC, M’Saoubi R, Jayal AD, Jawahir IS (2010) A numerical model incorporating the microstructure alteration for predicting residual stresses in hard machining of AISI 52100 steel. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59:113–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Umbrello D (2011) Influence of material microstructure changes on surface integrity in hard machining of AISI 52100 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:887–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coto B, Navas VG, Gonzalo O, Aranzabe A, Sanz C (2011) Influences of turning parameters in surface residual stresses in AISI 4340 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:911–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Su GS, Liu ZQ (2012) Wear characteristics of nano TiAlN-coated carbide tools in ultra-high speed machining of AerMet100. Wear 289:124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kruszyński BW, WoÂjcik R (2001) Residual stress in grinding. J Mater Process Technol 109:254–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Axir MH (2002) A method of modeling residual stress distribution in turning for different materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(9):1055–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu YQ, Zhang T, Bai YM (2012) Analysis of the surface residual stress in grinding Aermet100. Mater Sci Forum 704–705:318–324

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xu YQ, Zhang T, Bai YM (2010) Effect of grinding process parameters on surface layer residual stress. Adv Mater Res 135:154–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen X, Rowe WB, Cai R (2002) Precision grinding using CBN wheels. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:585–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rowe WB, Black S, Mills B (1996) Temperature control in CBN grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 12:387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bosheh SS, Mativenga PT (2006) White layer formation in hard turning of H13 tool steel at high cutting speeds using CBN tooling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(2):225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChangFeng Yao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, C., Wang, T., Ren, J. et al. A comparative study of residual stress and affected layer in Aermet100 steel grinding with alumina and cBN wheels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74, 125–137 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5955-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5955-8

Keywords

Navigation