Skip to main content
Log in

Influences of turning parameters in surface residual stresses in AISI 4340 steel

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of the residual stresses of parts that work under extreme conditions is of great interest, as they will influence the mechanical behavior of the components. This has a huge importance in the automotive and aeronautics sectors, in components such as power shafts or aircraft landing gears. Machining processes produce thermal and mechanical loads causing residual stresses in the surface of the finished component. The influence of the cutting parameters on the surface residual stresses generated during turning of AISI 4340 (40NiCrMo7) treated steel was analyzed. Surface residual stresses were measured using the X-ray diffraction technique and the sin2 ψ method. Both magnitude and direction of the residual stresses were assessed in order to understand how the cutting parameters affect the principal stresses directions and the homogeneity of the distribution of stresses. The ANOVA analysis has been used, obtaining the process window to reduce the tensile residual stresses affecting the component behavior against fatigue loads. When feed is increased, more heat is generated during the cutting process, leading to more tensile residual stresses. An increase in cutting speed results in a more adiabatic process (less heating of the part because heat is dissipated through the chip) that also leads to less tensile stresses. It has been observed that the maximum stress is localized around 30° from the cutting direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwach DW, Guo YB (2005) Feasibility of producing optimal surface integrity by process design in hard turning. Mat Sci Eng A 395:116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Residual stress part 2 – nature and origins. Mat Sci Tech 17:366–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Griffiths B (2001) Manufacturing surface technology—surface integrity & functional performance: Manufacturing engineering modular series. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wyatt JE, Berry JT (2006) A new technique for the determination of superficial residual stresses associated with machining and other manufacturing processes. J Mater Process Technol 171:132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Capello E (2005) Residual stress in turning - part I: influence of process parameters. J Mater Process Technol 160:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M’Saoubi R, Outeiro JC, Changeux B, Lebrun JL, Morao Dias S (1999) Residual stress analysis in orthogonal machining of standard and resulfurized AISI 316 L steels. J Mater Process Technol 96:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Outeiro JC, Dias AM, Lebrun JL, Astakhov VP (2002) Machining residual stresses in AISI 316 L steel and their correlation with the cutting parameters. Mach Sci Technol 6(2):251–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jang DY, Watkins TR, Kozaczek KJ, Hubbard CR, Cavin OB (1996) Surface residual stresses in machined austenitic stainless steel. Wear 194:168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gunnberg F, Escursell M, Jacobson M (2006) The influence of cutting parameters on residual stresses and surface topography during hard turning of 18MnCr5 case carburized steel. J Mater Process Technol 174:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pink J (1996). Landing gear structural integrity. Aersospace engineering. March. 13–16

  11. AISI 4340 General Information. http://www.efunda.com/materials

  12. ASM International (1990) Carbon and low alloy steels in metals handbook vol 1: properties and selection: iron, steels and high performance alloys, 10th edn. ASM International, Almere

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dahlman P, Gunnberg F, Jacobson M (2004) The influence of rake angle, cutting feed and cutting depth on residual stresses in hard turning. J Mater Process Technol 147(2):181–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chou YK, Evans CJ, Barash MM (2003) Experimental investigation on cubic boron nitride turning of hardened AISI 52100 steel. J Mater Process Technol 134(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu J (1996) Handbook of measurement of residual stresses. Fairmont, Lilburn

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noyan IC, Cohen JB (1987) Residual stress: measurement by diffraction and interpretation. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. He BB (2009) Two dimesional X-ray diffraction. Wiley, Chichester, 258 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. STATGRAPHICS software and documentation. http://www.statgraphics.com

  19. Outeiro JC, Dias AM, Lebrun JL (2004) Experimental assessment of temperature distribution in three-dimensional cutting process. Mach Sci Technol 8(3):357–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. AB Sandvik Coromant (2005) “Guía Técnica de mecanizado – Manual de Sandvik Coromant”. AB Sandvik Coromant, C-2900:3 SPA/01.

  21. Thiele JD, Melkote SN (1999) Effect of cutting edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface generation in the finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. J Mater Process Technol 94(2–3):216–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Capello E, Davoli P, Bassanini G, Bisi A (1999) Residual stresses and surface roughness in turning. J Eng Mat Tech – ASME Trans 121(3):346–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Borja Coto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coto, B., Navas, V.G., Gonzalo, O. et al. Influences of turning parameters in surface residual stresses in AISI 4340 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53, 911–919 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2890-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2890-1

Keywords

Navigation