Skip to main content
Log in

Study on the error distribution and key parameters for a desktop multi-axis micro milling machine tool

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Desktop micro milling machine tools are gaining more and more importance following the miniature tendency in various fields. More and more commercially available integral motion components adapts to the quick assembly of desktop machine tools. The key point to fulfill specific requirements of desktop micro milling machine tools is to know their accuracy capabilities in the design stage for the selection of appropriate motion components. Aiming at the point, full-error modeling is derived to analyze position error distributions in the whole workspace. According to the error models, key parameters affecting the final accuracy of a desktop five-axis micro milling machine tool are identified and optimized. It shows that both single-axis errors and structural parameters are very important in contributing to the final accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee SW (2004) Development and characterization of meso-scale machine tool systems. Dissertation, University of Michigan

  2. Kitahara T, Ishikawa Y, Terada T, Nakajima N, Furuta K (1996) Development of micro-lathe. J Mech Eng Lab 50(5):117–123

    Google Scholar 

  3. Axinte DA, AbdulShukor S, Bozdana AT (2010) An analysis of the functional capability of an in-house developed miniature 4-axis machine tool. Int J Mach Tool Manu 50:191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu ZN, Yoneyama T (1999) Micro cutting in the micro lathe turning system. Int J Mach Tool Manu 39(7):1171–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schaller T, Bohn L, Mayer J (1999) Microstructure grooves with a width of less than 500 μm cut with ground hard metal micro-end mills. Precis Eng 23:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Qin Y, Brockett A, Ma Y, Razali A, Zhao J, Harrison C, Pan W, Dai X, Loziak D (2010) Micro-manufacturing: research, technology outcomes and development issues. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47(9):821–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Park HW, Park YB, Liang SY (2011) Multi-procedure design optimization and analysis of mesoscale machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(1–4):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng X, Huang YM, Zhou SJ, Liu JY, Yang XH (2011) Study on the generative design and error budget of a novel desktop multi-axis laser machine for micro tool fabrications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(5–8):545–552

    Google Scholar 

  9. Samuel GL, Yang SH (2010) Enhancement of dimensional accuracy of micro features by applying parametric error compensation to the miniaturised machine tool. Int J Comput Mater Sci Surf Eng 3(4):373–391

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JH, Liu Y, Yang SH (2006) Accuracy improvement of miniaturized machine tool: geometric error modeling and compensation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(12–13):1508–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang W, Kweon SH, Hwang CS, Kang NC, Kim YS, Yang SH (2009) Development of an optical measuring system for integrated geometric errors of a three-axis miniaturized machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(7–8):701–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Treib T, Matthias E (1987) Error-budgeting-applied to the calculation and optimization of the volumetric error field of multiaxis systems. Ann CIRP 36(1):365–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Uriarte L, Herrero A, Zatarain M, Santiso G, de Lacalle LN L, Lamikiz A, Albizuri J (2007) Error budget and stiffness chain assessment in a micromilling machine equipped with tools less than 0.3 mm in diameter. Precis Eng 31:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin Y, Shen Y (2003) Modelling of five-axis machine tool metrology models using matrix summation approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(4):243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee RS, Lin YH (2012) Applying bidirectional kinematics to assembly error analysis for five-axis machine tools with general orthogonal configuration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9–12):1261–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Slocum AH (1992) Precision machine design. SME, Dearborn

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng X, Wang ZG, Nakamoto K, Yamazaki K (2011) A study on the micro tooling for micro/nano milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(5):523–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, X., Li, L., Huang, Y. et al. Study on the error distribution and key parameters for a desktop multi-axis micro milling machine tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67, 2521–2527 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4669-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4669-z

Keywords

Navigation