Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An ontology learning system for customer needs representation in product development

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intense competition and high failure rate of product introduction necessitate a deeper understanding of customer needs for product design. The conventional process of interpreting customer statements relies on imprecise information, making it highly unlikely, if not impossible, to acquire accurate need statements for the front-end process of product development. To deal with this problem, an ontology-learning customer needs representation (OCNR) system is proposed in this paper. The system uses natural language processing tools to preprocess customer statements. The customer needs ontology is then established based on the key concepts and their relations that are extracted from the customer statements. A set of need statements are then generated using the established customer needs ontology. A word property-based method is proposed to extract more nontaxonomic relations. A case study was conducted to illustrate the proposed approach. Results of this study suggest that the customer needs ontology derived from the proposed OCNR system contains more semantics than those obtained from the existing ontology learning systems, and, therefore, might be able to generate more accurate need statements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delin J, Sharoff S, Lillford S, Barnes C (2007) Linguistic support for concept selection decisions. AI EDAM 21(2):123–135

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alam I, Perry C (2002) A customer-oriented new service development process. J Serv Mark 16(6):515–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Du X, Jiao JR, Tseng MM (2006) Understanding customer satisfaction in product customization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31(3–4):396–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McKay A, de Pennington A, Baxter J (2001) Requirements management: a representation scheme for product specifications. Comput Aided Des 33(7):511–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2008) Product design and development, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kušar J, Duhovnik J, Tomaževič R, Starbek M (2007) Finding and evaluating customers' needs in the product-development process. Ugotavljanje in vrednotenje potreb kupcev y postopku razvoja izdelka 53(2):78–104

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhai LY, Khoo LP, Zhong ZW (2009) A dominance-based rough set approach to Kansei engineering in product development. Expert Syst Appl 36(1):393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao D, Li Z, Ramani K (2011) Ontology-based customer preference modeling for concept generation. Adv Eng Inform 25(2):162–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagamachi M (1989) Kansei engineering. Kaibundou, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rugg G, McGeorge P (1995) Laddering. Expert Syst 12(4):279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen C-H, Occeña LG (1999) A knowledge sorting process for a product design expert system. Expert Syst 16(3):170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan W, Pritchard MC, Chen CH, Khoo LP (2006) A strategy for integrating product conceptualization and bid preparation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29(5):616–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qiu SL, Fok SC, Chen CH, Xu S (2002) Conceptual design using evolutionary strategy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(9):683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiao J, Chen CH (2006) Customer requirement management in product development: a review of research issues. Concurr Eng Res A 14(3):173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chong YT, Chen CH (2010) Customer needs as moving targets of product development: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(1–4):395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin J, Fox MS, Bilgic T (1996) A requirement ontology for engineering design. Concurr Eng Res A 4(3):279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baida Z, Gordijn J, Sæle H, Akkermans H, Morch AZ (2005) An ontological approach for eliciting and understanding needs in e-services. Proceedings of CAiSE. Springer: New York

  18. Smirnov A, Pashkin M, Chilov N, Levashova T, Krizhanovsky A, Kashevnik A (2005) Ontology-based users and requests clustering in customer service management system. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3505:231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun W, Ma QY, Gao TY, Chen S (2010) Knowledge-intensive support for product design with an ontology-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48:421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang Y, Peng GL, Liu WJ (2010) Research on ontology-based integration of product knowledge for collaborative manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:1209–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cimiano P, Völker J, Studer R (2006) Ontologies on demand? A description of the state-of-the-art, applications, challenges and trends for ontology learning from text. Inf Wiss Praxis 57(6–7):315–320

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maedche A, Neumann G, Staab S (2002) Bootstrapping an ontology-based information extraction system. Intelligent exploration of the web. pp 345–359

  23. Jiang X, Tan AH (2010) CRCTOL: a semantic-based domain ontology learning system. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61(1):150–168

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen XY, Chen CH, Leong KF (2011) Automated ontology-based customer needs translation and representation. IEEE 2011, Beijing, China

  25. Lee T (2007) Constraint-based ontology induction from online customer reviews. Group Decis Negot 16(3):255–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Toutanova K, Klein D, Manning CD, Singer Y (2003) Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003, Edmonton, Canada

  27. Petrov S, Barrett L, Thibaux R, Klein D (2006) Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. Proceedings of COLING/ACG 2006, Sydney

  28. Sagar JC, Dungworth D, McDonald PF (1980) English special language: principles and practice in science and technology. Oscar Brandstetter, Wiesbaden, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  29. Buitelaar P, Olejnik D, Sintek M (2004) A protégé plug-in for ontology extraction from text based on linguistic analysis. Proceedings of ESWC 2004, Heraklion, Greece

  30. Chen XY, Chen CH, Leong KF (2011) Automated customer statement translation using online customer review, ICPD 2011, Tainan, Taiwan

  31. Fellbaum C (1998) A semantic network of English: the mother of all WordNets. Comput Humanit 32(2–3):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jiao J, Zhang YY, Helander MG (2006) A Kansei mining system for affective design. Expert Syst Appl 30(4):658–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, North Spine (N3), Level 2, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore

    Xingyu Chen, Chun-Hsien Chen & Kah Fai Leong

  2. School of Computer Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore

    Xing Jiang

Authors
  1. Xingyu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chun-Hsien Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kah Fai Leong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xing Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Hsien Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Chen, CH., Leong, K.F. et al. An ontology learning system for customer needs representation in product development. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67, 441–453 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4496-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4496-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation