Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using optimization procedures to minimize machining time while maintaining surface quality

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we present a methodology for minimizing machining time, where the surface roughness is constrained for the problem. The objective of the methodology is to encounter optimized cutting parameters which reduce machining time without reducing the surface quality of the machined workpiece. Three optimization schemes were considered to encounter the minima of a quantity which is a function of machining parameters: (a) sequential quadratic programming, (b) genetic algorithms, and (c) simulated annealing. For the discussion of the methodologies employed, an example of a machined surface is presented. The formalisms are used to obtain the parameters which minimize the machining time while maintaining the surface roughness within acceptable limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haftka RT, Gurdal Z (1992) Elements of structural optimization, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin

  2. Martellotti ME (1941) An analysis of the milling process. Trans ASME 63:667–700

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martellotti ME (1945) An analysis of the milling process, part II—Down milling. Trans ASME 67:233–251

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wan M, Zhang WH, Dang JW, Yang Y (2009) New procedures for calibration of instantaneous cutting force coefficients and cutter runout parameters in peripheral milling. Int J Mach Tools Manufact 49:1144–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quintana G, Ciurana J, Ribatallada J (2010) Surface roughness generation and material removal rate in ball end milling operations. Mater Manuf Process 25:386–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elbestawi MA, Ismail F, Yuen KM (1994) Surface topography characterization in finish milling. Int J Mach Tools Manufact 34:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raja SB, Baskar N (2010) Optimization techniques for machining operations: a retrospective research based on various mathematical models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48:1075–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi BK, Park JW, Jun CS (1993) Cutter-location data optimization in 5-axis surface machining. Comput Aided Des 25:377–386

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung TS, Yang MY, Lee KJ (2005) A new approach to analysing machined surfaces by ball-end milling, part I. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jung TS, Yang MY, Lee KJ (2005) A new approach to analysing machined surfaces by ball-end milling, part II. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tournier C, Duc E (2002) A surface based approach for constant scallop height tool-path generation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:318–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouzakis KD, Aichouh P, Efstatiou K (2003) Determination of the chip geometry, cutting force and roughness in free form surfaces finishing milling, with ball end tools Int. J Mach Tools Manuf 43:499–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Antoniadis A, Savakis C, Bilalis N, Balouktsis A (2003) Prediction of surface topomorphy and roughness in ball end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:965–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao T, Zhang WH, Qiu KP, Wan M (2006) Numerical simulation of machined surface topography and roughness in milling process. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 128:96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Belegundu D, Chandrupatla TR (1999) Optimization concepts and applications in engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dostál Z (2009) Optimal quadratic programming algorithms. Springer, Berlin

  17. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD Jr, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Bet L (1999) Estudo da Medição da Textura de Superfícies Com Sondas Mecânicas e Sondas Ópticas Tipo Seguidor. Ph.D. thesis (Mechanical Engineering), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

  20. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Rothlauf F (2006) Representations for genetic and evolutionary algorithms, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

  22. Riolo R, O'Reilly U, McConaghy T (2010) Genetic programming theory and practice VII. Springer, Berlin

  23. Zalzala AMS, Fleming PJ (eds) (1997) Genetic algorithms in engineering systems. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen JC, Zhong TX (2002) A hybrid-coded genetic algorithm based optimisation of non-productive paths in CNC machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. L. Corso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corso, L.L., Zeilmann, R.P., Nicola, G.L. et al. Using optimization procedures to minimize machining time while maintaining surface quality. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65, 1659–1667 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4288-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4288-8

Keywords

Navigation