Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimizing clearance variations and surplus parts in multiple characteristic radial assembly through batch selective assembly

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An assembly consists of two or more mating parts. The quality of any assembly depends on quality of its mating parts. The mating parts may be manufactured using different machines and processes with different standard deviations. Therefore, the dimensional distributions of the mating parts are not similar. This results in clearance between the mating parts. All precision assemblies demand for a closer clearance variation. A significant amount of research has already been done to minimize clearance variation using selective assembly. Surplus part is one of the important issues, which reduces the implementation of selective assembly in real situation. Surplus parts are inevitable while the assembly is made from components with undesired dimensional distributions. Batch selective assembly is introduced in this paper to reduce surplus parts to zero and it is achieved by using nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. For demonstrating the proposed algorithm, a complex assembly which consists of piston, piston ring and cylinder is considered as an example problem. The proposed algorithm is tested with a set of experimental problem datasets and is found outperforming the other existing methods found in the literature, in producing solutions with minimum clearance variations with zero surplus parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fang XD, Zhang Y (1995) A new algorithm for minimizing the surplus parts in selective assembly. Comput Ind Eng 28:341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen MS (1996) Optimizing tolerance allocation for mechanical components correlated by selective assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 12:349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan KC, Linn RJ (1998) A grouping method for selective assembly of parts of dissimilar distributions. Qual Eng 11(2):221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kannan SM, Jayabalan V (2001) A new grouping method for minimizing the surplus parts in selective assembly. Qual Eng 14(1):67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kern DC (2003) Forecasting manufacturing variation using historical process capability data: application for random assembly and serial processing. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp 137–188

  6. Mease D, Sudjianto A, Nair VN (2004) Selective assembly in manufacturing: statistical issues and optimal binning strategies. Technometrics 46(2):165–175

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kannan SM, Asha A, Jayabalan V (2005) A new method in selective assembly to minimize clearance variation for a radial assembly using genetic algorithm. Qual Eng 17:595–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujino Y (1987) Matching problem when lot size is large. Rep Stat Appl Res 34:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shan HS, Satyawadi A (1989) Computer-aided component selection for precision assembling. 10th international conference on production research. University of Nottingham, UK, pp 734–739

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coullard CR, Gamble AB, Jones PC (1998) Matching problems in selective assembly operations. Ann Oper Res 76:95–107

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Akachai Jantayavichit (2000) Efficient algorithms for tolerance improvement through selective assembly. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, pp 128–160

  12. Liu Z, Wong YS, Lee KS (2009) A manufacturing-oriented approach for multi-platforming product family design with modified genetic algorithm. J Intell Manuf. doi:10.1007/s10845-009-0365-8

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deb K (2003) Multi objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, England

    Google Scholar 

  14. Asha A, Kannan SM, Jayabalan V (2008) Optimization of clearance variation in selective assembly for components with multiple characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:1026–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lind DA, Marchal WG, Wathen SA (2005) Statistical techniques in business and economics, 12th edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Osma A (2009) A statistical approach to comparing wheel hub forging processes. Proc Int Mech Eng Part D J Automobile Eng 223:1559–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Victor Raj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Victor Raj, M., Saravana Sankar, S. & Ponnambalam, S.G. Minimizing clearance variations and surplus parts in multiple characteristic radial assembly through batch selective assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57, 1199–1222 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3367-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3367-6

Keywords

Navigation