Skip to main content
Log in

Optimum surface roughness prediction in face milling by using neural network and harmony search algorithm

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to determine the optimal cutting parameters leading to minimum surface roughness in face milling of X20Cr13 stainless steel by coupling artificial neural network (ANN) and harmony search algorithm (HS). In this regard, advantages of statistical experimental design technique, experimental measurements, analysis of variance, artificial neural network and harmony search algorithm were exploited in an integrated manner. To this end, numerous experiments on X20Cr13 stainless steel were conducted to obtain surface roughness values. A predictive model for surface roughness was created using a feed forward neural network exploiting experimental data. The optimization problem was solved by harmony search algorithm. Additional experiments were performed to validate optimum surface roughness value predicted by HS algorithm. The obtained results show that the harmony search algorithm coupled with feed forward neural network is an efficient and accurate method in approaching the global minimum of surface roughness in face milling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang B, Chen JC (2003) An in process neural network based surface roughness prediction (INN-SRP) system using a dynamometer in end milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:339–347

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohli A, Dixit US (2005) A neural network based methodology for the prediction of surface roughness in a turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dagnal MA (1986) Exploring surface texture. Rank Taylor Hobson, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  4. Box GEP, Draper NR (1987) Empirical model-building and response surface. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luong LHS, Spedding TA (1995) Neural-network system for predicting machining behavior. J Mater Process Technol 52:585–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Petri KL, Billo RE, Bidanda B (1998) A neural network process model for abrasive flow machining operations. J Manuf Sci 17(1):52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zang HC, Huang SH (1995) Application of neural network in manufacturing-a state of art survey. Int J Prod Res 33(3):705–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalpakjian S, Schmid SR (2001) Manufacturing Engineering and Technology. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lou S (1997) Development of four in process surface recognition systems to predict surface roughness in end milling. University of Iowa State, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  10. Godfrey C, Onwubolu (2006) Performance based optimization of multi pass face milling operations using Tribes. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 46:717–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong YJ, Young-Gu C, Hong-Gil K, Hsiao A (1996) Study of the correlation between surface roughness and cutting vibrations to develop an on-line roughness measuring technique in hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(4):453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. SECO Milling 1 (2007) Catalogue & Technical Guide. SECO Tools AB, 737 82 Fagersta, Sweden

  13. Keppel G, Zedeck S (1989) Data analysis for research designs: analysis of variance and multiple research/correlation approaches. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosse P (1996) Taguchi techniques for quality engineering, loss funktion, orthogonal experiments, parameter and tolerance design. McGraw-Hill, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sanjay C, Jyothi C (2006) A study of surface roughness in drilling using mathematical analysis and neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:846–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tansela IN, Ozcelikb B, Baoa WY, Chena P, Rincona D, Yanga SY, Yenilmezc A (2006) Selection of optimal cutting conditions by using GONNS. Int J mach Tool Manuf 46:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Jacob C, Chen Joseph C (2005) An artificial neural networks based in process tool wear prediction system in milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:427–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seok LK, Geem ZW (2005) A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 194:3902–3933

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Fogel LJ, Owens AJ, Walsh MJ (1966) Artificial Intelligence through Simulated Evolution. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jong KD (1975) Analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. Dissertation, University of Michigan

  21. Koza JR (1990) Genetic programming: a paradigm for genetically breeding populations of computer programs to solve problems. Rep No STAN-CS-90-1314, Stanford University, CA

  22. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Dissertation University of Michigan Press

  23. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, Addison. Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  24. Glover F (1977) Heuristic for integer programming using surrogate constraints. Decision Sci 8(1):156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C, Vecchi M (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001) a new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. simul 76(2):60–68

  27. Kim JH, Geem ZW, Kim ES (2001) Parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model using harmony search. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(5):1131–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. SuperNEC (2004) Success of the GA optimiser. In: Genetic Algorithm Optimiser User Reference Manual. SuperNEC Group. Available via DIALOG: http://www.supernec.com/manuals/sngaum.htm#_Toc21938615. Accessed July 2004

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Razfar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Razfar, M.R., Farshbaf Zinati, R. & Haghshenas, M. Optimum surface roughness prediction in face milling by using neural network and harmony search algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52, 487–495 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2757-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2757-5

Keyword

Navigation