Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An AHP model for selection of suppliers in the fast changing fashion market

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the fast-changing fashion market, being flexible and adaptive is a key to survival. Therefore, supply chain strategy like quick response is important in the fashion or textile industry. Selection of suppliers to support such strategies is thus one of the most critical activities, but is not well studied. Traditionally, suppliers are selected usually based on quantity requirement and cost, which are not the only important issues in the operation of a textile supply chain nowadays. This study presents an example on solving the supplier selection problem in the apparel industry by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which takes the operational performance (for example, flexibility, cost, and delivery) into account for supporting supply chain strategies. The system was implemented with the aid of the commercial software package Expert Choice. Based on the results from the AHP model, benefits of implementing quick response in apparel supply chains can also be verified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan HK, Chan FTS (2010) Comparative study of adaptability and flexibility in distributed manufacturing supply chains. Decis Support Syst 48(2):331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zubaidi HA, Tyler D (2004) A simulation model of quick response replenishment of seasonal clothing 32(6):320–327

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruce M, Daly L (2006) Buyer behaviour for fast fashion. J Fash Mark Manag 10(3):329–344

    Google Scholar 

  4. Forza C, Vnelli A (1997) Quick response in the textile-apparel industry and the support of information technologies. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 8(3):125–136

    Google Scholar 

  5. Akesson J, Jonsson P, Hallas RE (2007) An assessment of sourcing strategies in the Swedish apparel industry. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 37(9):740–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Min H (1994) International supplier selection: a multi-attribute utility approach. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 24(5):24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Percin S (2006) An application of the integrated AHP-PGP model in supplier selection. Meas Bus Excell 10(4):34–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghodsypour SH, O’Brien C (1998) A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Int J Prod Econ 56/57:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan HK, Chan FTS (2006) Early order completion contract approach to minimise the impact of demand uncertainty on supply chains. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2(1):48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan HK, Chan FTS (2009) Effect of information sharing in supply chains with flexibility. Int J Prod Res 47(1):213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang SH, Keskar H (2006) Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. Int J Prod Econ 105:510–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Teng SG, Jaramillo H (2005) A model for evaluation and selection of supplies in global textile and apparel supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 35(7):503–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan FTS, Chan HK, Ip RWL, Lau HCW (2007) A decision support system for supplier selection in the airline industry. Proc Inst Mech Eng, B J Eng Manuf 221(4):741–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarkis J, Talluri S (2002) A model for strategic supplier selection. J Supply Chain Manag 38(1):18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bayazit O (2005) Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 16(7):808–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Cebeci U (2009) Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard. Expert Syst Appl 36(5):8900–8909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S (2009) Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach. J Manufact Tech Manage 20(7):1009–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yüksel İ, Dağdeviren M (2007) Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis—a case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences 117(6):3364–3382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dadashian F, Shakibfar S, Fazel Zarandi MH (2007) Strategic alliance for core competencies improvement in textile industries. Int J Manage Sci Eng Manage 2(2):98–107

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shafaei R (2009) An analytical approach to assessing the competitiveness in the textile industry. J Fash Mark Manag 13(1):20–36

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng EWL, Li H (2001) Analytic hierarchy process: an approach to determine measures for business performance. Meas Bus Excell 5(3):30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saaty TL (1990) An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper: remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Manage Sci 36(3):259–268

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19–43

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hing Kai Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, F.T.S., Chan, H.K. An AHP model for selection of suppliers in the fast changing fashion market. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51, 1195–1207 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2683-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2683-6

Keywords

Navigation