Skip to main content
Log in

Capability indices and nonconforming proportion in univariate and multivariate processes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main usefulness of a capability index is to relate the actual variability of the process with the admissible one. This admissible variability is, in turn, related with the nonconforming proportion. Hence, the capability index should be closely related to the nonconforming proportion. In univariate and centered processes, the classical C p index explicitly admits this interpretation. For instance, if C p  = 0.5, the standard deviation should be reduced to 50% to attain C p  = 1. However, for noncentered processes and multivariate processes, there is a lack of capability indices that admit such an interpretation. This article fills this gap in the literature and proposes univariate and multivariate capability indices that have a direct interpretation of how much the variability of the process should increase or decrease to attain a unitary index. Some numerical examples are used to compare the proposed indices with the existing ones, showing the advantages of the proposals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kotz S, Johnson N (2002) Process capability indices. A review, 1992–2000. J Qual Technol 34:2–19

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu KT, Sheu SH, Chen KS (2007) The evaluation of process capability for a machining center. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:505–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu KT, Sheu SH, Chen KS (2007) Testing multi-characteristics product capability indices. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan L, Cheng S, Spiring F (1991) A multivariate measure of process capability. Int J Mod Simul 11:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taam W, Subbaiah P, Liddy J (1993) A note on multivariate capability indices. J Appl Stat 20:339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wierda S (1993) A multivariate process capability index. Trans ASQC Qual Congress 342–348

  7. Chen H (1994) A multivariate process capability index over a rectangular solid tolerance zone. Stat Sin 4:749–758

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Shahriari H, Hubele N, Lawrence F (1995) A multivariate process capability vector. In: Proceedings of the 4th industrial engineering research conference, Nashville, May 1995, pp 303–308

  9. Wang F, Chen J (1998) Capability index using principal component analysis. Qual Eng 11:21–27

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang F, Du T (2000) Using principal component analysis in process performance for multivariate data. Omega 28:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang CH (2005) Constructing multivariate process capability indices for short-run production. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:1306–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Polansky A (2001) A smooth nonparametric approach to multivariate process capability. Technometrics 43:199–211

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Castagilola P, García Castellanos JV (2005) Capability indices dedicated to the two quality characteristics case. Qual Tech Quan Manag 2:201–220

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pearn WL, Lin PC (2004) Measuring process yield based on the capability index Cpm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:503–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clements JA (1989) Process capability calculations for non-normal distributions. Qual Prog 22:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  17. Castagliola P (1996) Evaluation of non-normal process capability indices using Burr’s distributions. Qual Eng 8:587–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu P, Chen FL (2006) Process capability analysis of non-normal process data using Burr XII distribution. Iny J Adv Manuf Technol 27:975–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hosseinifard S, Abbasi B, Ahmad S, Abdollahian M (2008) A transformation technique to estimate the process capability index for non-normal processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1376-x

  20. Polansky A (1998) A smooth nonparametric approach to process capability. Qual Reliab Eng Int 14:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abbasi B (2009) A neural network applied to estimate process capability of non-normal processes. Exp Syst App 36:3093–3100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. González I, Sánchez I (2008) Principal alarms in multivariate statistical process control. J Qual Technol 40:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hyvärinen A, Karhuen J, Oja E (2001) Independent component analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. González I, Sánchez I (2008) Principal alarms in multivariate statistical process control using independent component anlysis. Int J Prod Res 46:6345–6366

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Sultan T (1986) An acceptance chart for raw materials of two correlated properties. Qual Assur 12:70–72

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karl D, Morisette J, Taam W (1994) Some applications of a multivariate capability index in geometric dimensioning and tolerancing. Qual Eng 6:649–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang F, Hubele N, Lawrence F, Mislukin J, Shahriari H (2000) Comparison of three multivariate process capability indices. J Qual Technol 32:263–275

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel González.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González, I., Sánchez, I. Capability indices and nonconforming proportion in univariate and multivariate processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44, 1036–1050 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1907-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1907-5

Keywords

Navigation