Skip to main content
Log in

Cost optimization of process tolerance allocation-a tree based approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tolerance transfer techniques are used extensively for allocation of tolerances for each machining operation in the process sequence, and hence are used to coordinate the process planning and the design activities in the evolution of a new product. This paper deals with an extended approach to allocate process tolerances based on a tree topology called technologically and topologically related surfaces (TTRS) and its subsequent extension to cost optimization. The benefit of this approach is that equations are generated explicitly with regard to tolerance transfer. These have been exploited by implementing the cost function in the generated explicit equations and subsequent optimization. The TTRS approach has been extended which scores over the limitations of some of the already existing techniques in that, it is optimal with respect to two factors namely, cost of producing the required tolerances, as also the process capability of the machines involved in producing the part. This technique has been proved practically feasible as it has been implemented in an industry. To enable a better view of the advantages of the approach, a comparative study with the existing techniques has been carried out in addition to a simulation using the Monte Carlo method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TTRS:

Technologically and topologically related surfaces

Cost function:

\(C = A + B/T^{k} \)

A:

Fixed cost include setup cost, tooling, material cost etc.

B:

Cost of producing a single component dimension to a specified tolerance and includes the charge rate of the machine

T:

Specified tolerance in mm

k:

Sensitivity of the process cost to changes in tolerance specifications

C:

Total cost of producing a single component dimension to a specified tolerance

MGDE:

Minimum geometrical datum elements

TTRS 1, TTRS 2, .... etc.:

Design specification TTRS

S1, S2, S3,.... etc.:

Finished surfaces

S1′, S2′, ..... , S1″,S2″,.... etc.:

Surfaces formed in intermediate machining operations and the final operations are yet to be performed

TTRS1′, TTRS2′.... etc.:

Process plan related TTRS

IS:

Indian standards

TB.P :

Blue print tolerance

Ti :

Tolerance of the ‘ith’ dimension

Ai :

Fixed cost for the ‘ith’ dimension

Bi :

Value of B for the ‘ith’ dimension

n:

Number of dimensions

λ:

Lagrangian multiplier

B/P:

Blueprint

References

  1. Desrochers A (2003) A CAD/CAM representation model applied to tolerance transfer methods. Trans ASME-J Mech Des 125:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ngoi BKA, Ong JM (1999) A complete tolerance charting system in assembly. Int J Prod Res 37(11):2477–2498

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chase KW (1999) Tolerance allocation methods for designers. ADCATS ReportNo.99–6

  4. Khalil W, Besnard S, Lemoine P (2000) Comparison study of the geometric parameters calibration methods. Int J Robot Automat 15:56–67

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kalsi M, Hacker K, Lewis K (2001) A comprehensive robust design approach for decision trade - offs in complex systems design. ASME J Mech Des 121:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Parkinson DB (2000) The application of a robust design method to tolerancing. ASME J Mech Des 22:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajagopalan S, Cutkosky M (2003) Error analysis for the in-situ fabrication of mechanisms. ASME J Mech Des 125:809–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu J, Ting KL (2001) Performance distribution analysis and robust design. ASME J Mech Des 123:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu SJ, Webbink R, Lee J, Long Y (2003) Robustness evaluation for compliant assembly systems. ASME J Mech Des 125:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunasekaran K (2004) Study of tolerance-cost relationships for tolerance analysis and synthesis of precision assemblies. Dissertation, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, INDIA

  11. Ngoi BKA, Fang SL (1994) Computer-aided tolerance charting. Int J Prod Res 32(8):1939–1954

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ngoi BKA, Ong CT (1993) A complete tolerance charting system. Int J Prod Res 31:453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Irani SA, Mittal RO, Lehtihet EA (1989) Tolerance chart optimization. Int J Prod Res 27(9):1531–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wade OR (1967) Tolerance control in design and manufacturing. Industrial Press, New York, pp87–98

    Google Scholar 

  15. CMTI, Bangalore (2000) Machine tool design hand book. Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tseng Y-J, Kung H-W (1999) Evaluation of alternative tolerance allocations for multiple machining sequences with geometric tolerances. Int J Prod Res 37(17):3883–3900

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanjeev Kumar SV (2004) Compatibility of the TTRS representation model with traditional tolerance transfer techniques. Dissertation, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, India

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Kumaravel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumaravel, P., Anand, S., Ullas, U. et al. Cost optimization of process tolerance allocation-a tree based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34, 703–713 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0641-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0641-0

Keywords

Navigation