Abstract
A well-formed spatial model should most likely not produce spatial autocorrelation at all. From this perspective spatial autocorrelation is not (pure) statistical nuisance but a sign of that a model lacks a representation of an important economic phenomenon. In a Knowledge Production Function (KPF) context, this paper shows that a representation of space reflecting the potential of physical interaction between localities by means of accessibility variables on the “right-hand-side”—a simple alternative to spatial lag and spatial error which can be estimated by OLS—captures substantive spatial dependence. Results are verified with Monte Carlo simulations based on Anselin’s (Int Reg Sci Rev 26(2):153–166, 2003) taxonomy of modelled and unmodelled effects. The analysis demonstrates that an accessibility representation of explanatory variables depict the network nature of spatial interaction, such that spatial dependence is actually modelled.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson M, Ejermo O (2004) Sectoral knowledge production in Swedish regions 1993–1999. In: Karlsson C, Flensburg P, Hörte S-Å (eds) Knowledge spillovers and knowlegde management. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 143–170
Andersson M, Ejermo O (2005) How does accessibility to knowledge sources affect the innovativeness of corporations?—Evidence from Sweden. Ann Reg Sci 39: 741–765
Andersson M, Karlsson C (2007) Knowledge in regional economic growth—the role of knowledge accessibility. Ind Innov 14: 129–149
Anselin L (1988a) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Anselin L (1988b) Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geogr Anal 20: 1–17
Anselin L (2001) Spatial econometrics. In: Baltagi B (eds) A companion to theoretical econometrics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 310–330
Anselin L (2003) Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(2): 153–166
Anselin L, Bera A (1998) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: Ullah A, Giles DE (eds) Handbook of applied economic statistics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 237–289
Anselin L, Florax R (eds) (1995) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin
Anselin L, Rey S (1991) Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geogr Anal 23: 112–131
Baradaran S, Ramjerdi F (2001) Performance of accessibility measures in europe. J Transp Stat 3: 31–48
Beckman M et al (2000) Interurban knowledge networks. In: Batten D (eds) Learning, innovation and the urban evolution. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London
Ben-Akiva M, Lerman S (1979) Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility. In: Henscher DA, Stopher PR (eds) Behavioral travel modelling. Croon Helm, London, pp 654–679
Burridge P (1980) On the Cliff–Ord test for spatial autocorrelation. J R Stat Soc B 42: 107–108
Cliff A, Ord JK (1972) Testing for spatial autocorrelation among regression residuals. Geogr Anal 4: 267–284
Dicken P, Lloyd P (1990) Location in space—theoretical perspectives in economic geography, 3rd edn. Harper Collins Publishers, New York
Dubin R (1992) Spatial autocorrelation and neighborhood quality. Reg Sci Urban Econ 22: 433–452
Feldman M (1999) The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: a review of empirical studies. Econ Innov New Technol 8: 5–25
Florax R, van der Vlist A (2003) Spatial Econometric data analysis: moving beyond traditional models. Int Reg Sci Rev 26: 223–243
Cheshire P, Carbonaro G (1995) Convergence–divergence in regional growth rates: an emty black-box?. In: Armstrong HW, Vickerman RW (eds) Convergence and divergence among European Regions. European research in regional science. Pion, Londres
Gråsjö U (2005) The importance of accessibility to R&D on patent production in Swedish municipalities. In: Johansson I (ed) Uddevalla symposium 2004: regions in competition and co-operation. Papers presented at the 7th Uddevalla symposium 2004, 17–19 June, Fredrikstad, Norway. Research Reports 2005:01, University of Trollhättan/Uddevalla
Gråsjö U (2006) Human capital, R&D and regional exports. In: Johansson I (ed) Uddevalla symposium 2005: innovations and entrepreneurship in functional regions. Papers presented at the 8th Uddevalla symposium and the 8th McGill international entrepreneurship conference, 15–17 September, 2005, Uddevalla, Sweden, Research Reports 2006:01, University West
Hansen WG (1959) How accessibility shapes land-use. J Am Inst Plann 25: 73–76
Harris C (1954) The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 64: 315–348
Hordijk L (1974) Spatial correlation in the disturbances of a linear interregional model. Reg Urban Econ 4: 117–140
Hugosson P, Johansson B (2001) Business trips between functional regions. In: Hugosson P (eds) Interregional business travel and the economics of business interaction. Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping
Johansson B, Klaesson J, Olsson M (2002) Time distances and labor market integration. Pap Reg Sci 81: 305–327
Johansson B, Klaesson J, Olsson M (2003) Commuters’ non-linear response to time distances. J Geogr Syst 5: 315–329
Jones SR (1981) Accessibility measures: a literature review. TRRL Report 967: Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne
Karlsson C, Manduchi A (2001) Knowledge spillovers in a spatial context. In: Fischer M, Fröhlich J (eds) Knowledge complexity and innovation systems. Springer, Berlin
Maddala GS (1983) Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Maratello D, Nijkamp P, Reggiani A (1998) Measurement and measures of network accessibility: economic perspectives. In: Button K, Nijkamp P, Priemus H (eds) Transport networks in Europe; concepts, analysis and policies. Edward Elgar, UK, pp 161–180
McMillen DP (2003) Spatial autocorrelation or model misspecification?. Int Reg Sci Rev 26: 208–217
Niebuhr A (2001) Convergence and the effects of spatial interaction. HWWA discussion papers, No 110
Pirie GH (1979) Measuring accessibility: a review and proposal. Environ Plan A 11: 299–312
Smith TE (1978) A cost-efficiency principle of spatial interaction behaviour. Reg Sci Urban Econ 8: 313–337
Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46: 234–240
Train K (1986) Qualitative choice analysis. MIT University Press, Massachusetts
Weibull J (1976) An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility. Reg Sci Urban Econ 6: 357–379
Weibull J (1980) On the numerical measurement of accessibility. Environ Plan A 12: 53–67
Wilson AG (2000) Complex spatial systems—the modelling foundations of urban and regional economics. Prentice Hall, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andersson, M., Gråsjö, U. Spatial dependence and the representation of space in empirical models. Ann Reg Sci 43, 159–180 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0211-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0211-5