Skip to main content
Log in

High survivorship rate and good clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up for lateral UKA: a systematic literature review

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the available literature to understand the effectiveness, the survivorship, the clinical outcomes and the complications of lateral UKA.

Methods

A review of the current literature available about lateral UKA was performed in March 2020, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Selection was based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) clinical reports of any level of evidence, (2) written in English language, (3) published from 1996 to 2020, (4) dealing with clinical data on lateral UKA. A total of 47 articles, published between 1996 and 2020, were included in the review. Quality of every article was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score.

Results

A total of 47 studies were included. Mean mCMS was 45.27 (range 30–62). Mean age at surgery was 64.5 years (range 34.1–88.0 years). In 1741 patients (65.5%) a metal back implant was used and in 421 patients (15.8%) an all poly design was used. Several scores were used to evaluate clinical results (OKS, AKSS, IKS, KOOS, WOMAC, VAS). Range of motion improved with an overall mean value of 120.3° (range: 105.9°–143.3°). The mean follow-up was 60.7 months (range, 7–204 months), mean survivorship (absence of a revision) with a minimum 60 months of follow-up was 88.6% (range 74.5–100) and mean satisfaction of patients was 78.5% (range 41.0–97.9).

Conclusions

Lateral UKA seems to be an effective solution to manage lateral osteoarthritis (OA), based on preliminary results, with survivorship and satisfaction rate comparable to medial UKA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Nonetheless, this review highlights that the quality of studies available in current literature is low.

Level of evidence

Systematic review of level IV studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altuntas AO, Alsop H, Cobb JP (2013) Early results of a domed tibia, mobile bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from an independent centre. Knee 20:466–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Argenson JNA, Parratte S, Bertani A, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM (2008) Long-term results with a lateral unicondylar replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2686–2693

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashraf T, Newman JH, Evans RL, Ackroyd CE (2002) Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years. J Bone Jt Surg 84:1126–1130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Batailler C, White N, Ranaldi FM, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S (2019) Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1232–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berend KR, Kolczun MC, George JW, Lombardi AV (2012) Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a lateral parapatellar approach has high early survivorship. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:77–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Canetti R, Batailler C, Bankhead C, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S (2018) Faster return to sport after robotic-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparative study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138:1765–1771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davies GS, van Duren B, Shorthose M, Roberts PG, Morley JR, Monk AP, Murray DW, Pandit HG (2016) Changes in patella tendon length over 5 years after different types of knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3029–3035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Demange MK, Von Keudell A, Probst C, Yoshioka H, Gomoll AH (2015) Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39:1519–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deroche E, Batailler C, Lording T, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S (2019) High survival rate and very low wear of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty at long term: a case series of 54 cases at a mean follow-up of 17 years. J Arthroplasty 34:1097–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Duren BH, Pandit H, Hamilton TW, Fievez E, Monk AP, Dodd CAF, Murray DW (2014) Trans-patella tendon approach for domed lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty does not increase the risk of patella tendon shortening. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1887–1894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Edmiston TA, Manista GC, Courtney PM, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ, Levine BR (2018) Clinical outcomes and survivorship of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does surgical approach matter? J Arthroplasty 33:362–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fornell S, Prada E, Barrena P, García-Mendoza A, Borrego E, Domecq G (2018) Mid-term outcomes of mobile-bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 25:1206–1213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Forster MC, Bauze AJ, Keene GCR (2007) Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: fixed or mobile bearing? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1107–1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gill JR, Nicolai P (2019) Clinical results and 12-year survivorship of the Physica ZUK unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 26:750–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gunther TV, Murray DW, Miller R, Wallace DA, Carr AJ, O’Connor JJ, McLardy-Smith P, Goodfellow JW (1996) Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford meniscal knee. Knee 3:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heaps BM, Blevins JL, Chiu YF, Konopka JF, Patel SP, McLawhorn AS (2019) Improving estimates of annual survival rates for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, a meta-analysis. J. Arthroplasty 34:1538–1545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Peersman G, Cartier P (2012) Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged. Knee 19:585–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heyse TJ, Tibesku CO (2010) Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1539–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. John J, Mauffrey C, May P (2011) Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series. Int Orthop 35:507–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim KT, Lee S, Kim J, Kim JW, Kang MS (2016) Clinical results of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: minimum 2-year follow-up. CiOS Clin Orthop Surg 8:386–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kinsey TL, Anderson DN, Phillips VM, Mahoney OM (2018) Disease progression after lateral and medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:3441–3447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liebs TR, Herzberg W (2013) Better quality of life after medial versus lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2629–2640

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. van der List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD (2016) Patients with isolated lateral osteoarthritis: unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty? Knee 23:968–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van der List JP, McDonald LS, Pearle AD (2015) Systematic review of medial versus lateral survivorship in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 22:454–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lustig S, Elguindy A, Servien E, Fary C, Munini E, Demey G, Neyret P (2011) 5- to 16-year follow-up of 54 consecutive lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasties with a fixed-all polyethylene bearing. J Arthroplasty 26:1318–1325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lustig S, Lording T, Frank F, Debette C, Servien E, Neyret P (2014) Progression of medial osteoarthritis and long term results of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty: 10 to 18 year follow-up of 54 consecutive implants. Knee 21:S26–S32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lustig S, Parratte S, Magnussen RA, Argenson JN, Neyret P (2012) Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty relieves pain and improves function in posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:69–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Marcovigi A, Zambianchi F, Sandoni D, Rivi E (1885) Catani F (2017) Robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty: a single centre experience. Acta Biomed 88:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marson B, Prasad N, Jenkins R, Lewis M (2014) Lateral unicompartmental knee replacements: early results from a District General Hospital. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:987–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, Kobayashi A, Sakamoto H, Freeman MAR, Yamano Y (2000) Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Jt Surg 82:1199–1200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Newman SDS, Altuntas A, Alsop H, Cobb JP (2017) Up to 10 year follow-up of the Oxford domed lateral partial knee replacement from an independent centre. Knee 24:1414–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohdera T, Tokunaga J, Kobayashi A (2001) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for lateral gonarthrosis: midterm results. J Arthroplasty 16:196–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ollivier M, Abdel MP, Parratte S, Argenson JN (2014) Lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA): contemporary indications, surgical technique, and results. Int Orthop 38:449–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard DJ, Price AJ, Gill HS, Dodd CAF, Murray DW (2010) Mobile bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 17:392–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN (2006) Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: survivorship and technical considerations at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. J Arthroplasty 21:13–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sah AP, Scott RD (2007) Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a medial approach: study with an average five-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg 89:1948–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Saragaglia D, Bevand A, Refaie R, Rubens-Duval B, Pailhé R (2018) Results with nine years mean follow up on one hundred and three KAPS® uni knee arthroplasties: eighty six medial and seventeen lateral. Int Orthop 42:1061–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Saragaglia D, Marques Da Silva B, Dijoux P, Cognault J, Gaillot J, Pailhé R (2017) Computerised navigation of unicondylar knee prostheses: from primary implantation to revision to total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 41:293–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Saxler G, Temmen D, Bontemps G (2004) Medium-term results of the AMC-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 11:349–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schelfaut S, Beckers L, Verdonk P, Bellemans J, Victor J (2013) The risk of bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a mobile biconcave design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2487–2494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Scott RD (2005) Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less traveled. Orthopedics 28:983–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Seeger JB, Schikschneit JP, Schuld C, Rupp R, Jäger S, Schmitt H, Maier GS, Clarius M (2015) Change of gait in patients with lateral osteoarthritis of the knee after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2049–2054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Servien E, Aitsiselmi T, Neyret P, Verdonk P (2008) How to select candidates for lateral unicompartmental prosthesis. Curr Orthop Pract 19:451–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Smith JRA, Robinson JR, Porteous AJ, Murray JRD, Hassaballa MA, Artz N, Newman JH (2014) Fixed bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-Short to midterm survivorship and knee scores for 101 prostheses. Knee 21:843–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Streit MR, Walker T, Bruckner T, Merle C, Kretzer JP, Clarius M, Aldinger PR, Gotterbarm T (2012) Mobile-bearing lateral unicompartmental knee replacement with the Oxford domed tibial component: an independent series. J Bone Jt Surg 94:1356–1361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Verdonk R, Cottenie D, Almqvist KF, Vorlat P (2005) The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a 2–14 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:163–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Volpi P, Marinoni L, Bait C, Galli M, Denti M (2007) Lateral unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: indications, technique and short-medium term results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1028–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Walker T, Gotterbarm T, Bruckner T, Merle C, Streit MR (2015) Return to sports, recreational activity and patient-reported outcomes after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg SportsTraumatol Arthrosc 23:3281–3287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Walker T, Gotterbarm T, Bruckner T, Merle C, Streit MR (2014) Total versus unicompartmental knee replacement for isolated lateral osteoarthritis: a matched-pairs study. Int Orthop 38:2259–2264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Walker T, Hariri M, Eckert J, Panzram B, Reiner T, Merle C, Gotterbarm T, Moradi B (2020) Minimally invasive lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: early results from an independent center using the Oxford fixed lateral prosthesis. Knee 27:235–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Walker T, Zahn N, Bruckner T, Streit MR, Mohr G, Aldinger PR, Clarius M, Gotterbarm T (2018) Mid-term results of lateral unicondylar mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study of 363 cases. Bone Jt J 100B:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Walton MJ, Weale AE, Newman JH (2006) The progression of arthritis following lateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 13:374–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Weston-Simons JS, Pandit H, Kendrick BJL, Jenkins C, Barker K, Dodd CAF, Murray DW (2014) The mid-term outcomes of the Oxford Domed Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Bone Jt J 96:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Xing Z, Katz J, Jiranek W (2012) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : factors influencing the outcome. J Knee Surg 25(5):369–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

None.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Altomare.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonanzinga, T., Tanzi, P., Altomare, D. et al. High survivorship rate and good clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up for lateral UKA: a systematic literature review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 3262–3271 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06129-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06129-8

Keywords

Navigation