Abstract
Background
The number of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) is growing worldwide. Because lateral UKAs are performed much less frequently than medial UKAs, the limited information leaves unclear whether UKAs have comparable survival and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the lateral UKA to medial UKAs.
Questions/purposes
We therefore compared the (1) survivorship and (2) HRQoL after lateral versus medial cemented mobile-bearing UKAs and (3) determined whether there is an association of survival to modifications of surgical technique in one of three phases.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 558 patients who underwent mobile-bearing UKAs from 2002 to 2009. From the records we determined revision of the joint for any reason and revision for aseptic loosening. Patients reported their physical function, pain, and stiffness as measured by the WOMAC, SF-36 physical-component summary (PCS), and Lequesne knee score. Information regarding implant survival was collected for 93% of the patients. We analyzed the patients separately by three phases based on surgical changes associated with each phase (1: initial technique; 2: improved cementing; 3: additional bone resection to ensure backward sliding of the inlay without impingement). The minimum followup was 2.1 years (mean, 6 years; range, 2.1–9.8 years).
Results
Implant survival was 88% at 9 years. We found similar implant survival rates for medial (90%) and lateral UKAs (83%). In all HRQoL measures, patients receiving a medial UKA had better mean scores compared with patients who had a lateral UKA: WOMAC physical function (23 versus 34, respectively) and pain (21 versus 34) and SF-36 PCS (41 versus 38). There were no survival differences by surgical phase.
Conclusions
Our observations suggest a medial UKA is associated with superior HRQoL when compared with a lateral UKA, although implant survival is similar.
Level of Evidence
Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes. Units of analysis. BMJ. 1997;314:1874.
Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gotzsche PC, Lang T. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–694.
Altuntas AO, Alsop H, Cobb JP. Early results of a domed tibia, mobile bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from an independent centre. Knee. 2012 Dec 28. pii: S0968-0160(12)00230-X. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.11.008 [Epub ahead of print].
Arastu MH, Vijayaraghavan J, Chissel H, Hull JB, Newmann JH, Robinson JR. Early failure of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:1178–1183.
Argenson JN, Parratte S, Bertani A, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM. Long-term results with a lateral unicondylar replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2686–2693.
Ashraf T, Newman JH, Evans RL, Ackroyd CE. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1126–1130.
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. 2009. Adelaide, Australia: Australian Orthopaedic Association. Available at: https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/de/annual-reports-2009. Accessed March 13, 2013.
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. 2012. Adelaide, Australia: Australian Orthopaedic Association. Available at: https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/de/annual-reports-2012. Accessed March 13, 2013.
Barret M, Wilson E, Whalen D. Summary 2007 HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) Comparison Report. Report # 2010-03. Washington, DC, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; September 9, 2010. HCUP Method Series Report.
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.
Bullinger M. German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 Health Survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1359–1366.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 1988.
Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963–974.
Fitz W, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, ed. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2012:988–995.
Geller JA, Yoon RS, McKean J, Macaulay W. Does a high-flexion design affect early outcome of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty? Clinical comparison at 2 years. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1468–1474.
Gunther TV, Murray DW, Miller R, Wallace AJ, Carr AJ, O’Connor JJ, McLardy-Smith P, Goodfellow J. Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford meniscal knee. Knee. 1996;3:33–39.
Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Peersman G, Cartier P. Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged. Knee. 2012;19:585–591.
Heyse TJ, Tibesku CO. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:1539–1548.
König DP, Popken F, Herzberg W, Eysel P. The minimally invasive unicompartimental knee system ‘Preservation.’ First clinical results and analysis of complications. Orthopade. 2004;33:1284–1289.
Lequesne MG, Mery C, Samson M, Gerard P. Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Validation—value in comparison with other assessment tests. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1987;65:85–89.
Lisowski LA, van den Bekerom MP, Pilot P, van Dijk CN, Lisowski AE. Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:277–284.
Ludwig FJ, Melzer C, Grimmig H, Daalmann HH. [Cross cultural adaptation of the lequesne algofunctional indices for German speaking patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and the knee] [in German]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2002;41:249–257.
Lustig S, Elguindy A, Servien E, Fary C, Munini E, Demey G, Neyret P. 5- to 16-year follow-up of 54 consecutive lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasties with a fixed-all polyethylene bearing. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1318–1325.
Lustig S, Parratte S, Magnussen RA, Argenson JN, Neyret P. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty relieves pain and improves function in posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:69–76.
Lyons MC, Macdonald SJ, Somerville LE, Naudie DD, McCalden RW. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:84–90.
Mariani EM, Bourne MH, Jackson RT, Jackson ST, Jones P. Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(Suppl 2):81–84.
Marmor L. Lateral compartment arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;186:115–121.
National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 9th Annual Report 2012. Hernel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK: NJR Centre; 2012.
NIH Consensus Panel. NIH Consensus Statement on Total Knee Replacement Dec 8–10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1328–1335.
O’Rourke MR, Gardner JJ, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Vittetoe DA, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. The John Insall Award: unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-one-year followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:27–37.
Ohdera T, Tokunaga J, Kobayashi A. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for lateral gonarthrosis: midterm results. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:196–200.
Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: survivorship and technical considerations at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:13–17.
Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W. Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. New York, NY, USA: Churchill Livingstone; 1997.
Sah AP, Scott RD. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a medial approach. Study with an average five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1948–1954.
Scott RD. Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less traveled. Orthopedics. 2005;28:983–984.
Scott RD, Santore RF. Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:536–544.
Stucki G, Meier D, Stucki S, Michel BA, Tyndall AG, Dick W, Theiler R. [Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Arthrosis Index] [in German]. Z Rheumatol. 1996;55:40–49.
Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1995;33(Suppl):AS264–AS279.
Whiteside LA. Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last: three keys to success. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(Suppl 2):2–3.
Xing Z, Katz J, Jiranek W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: factors influencing the outcome. J Knee Surg. 2012;25:369–374.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
One of the authors (TRL) certifies that he has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, an amount of USD 10,000–USD 100,000, from DePuy International Ltd (Leeds, UK).
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDA approval status, of any drug or device before clinical use.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
This work was performed at Department of Surgery, Wedel Hospital, Wedel, Germany, and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asklepios Westklinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
About this article
Cite this article
Liebs, T.R., Herzberg, W. Better Quality of Life After Medial Versus Lateral Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 2629–2640 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2966-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2966-y