Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Open reconstruction with autologous spongiosa grafts and matrix-induced chondrogenesis for osteochondral lesions of the talus can be performed without medial malleolar osteotomy

  • Ankle
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate complication rates and postoperative outcomes in patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus who underwent an autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) procedure with autologous spongiosa grafting without malleolar osteotomy.

Methods

A total of 23 patients with a mean age of 35.6 ± 13.9 years were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 33.5 ± 10.4 months (range 24–52.9 months). The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Foot Function Index (FFI). Postoperatively, lesion healing was assessed using the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) protocol.

Results

There were no intraoperative or perioperative complications. In one patient, arthroscopic arthrolysis was performed due to painful arthrofibrosis. The mean VAS significantly decreased from 7.6 ± 1.1 (range 4.2–9.3) to 1.4 ± 2.2 (range 0–7.4) (P < 0.001). The mean FFI significantly improved from 46.8 ± 14.3 (range 24.3–80.8) to 15.9 ± 11.4 (range 10.0–51.7) (P < 0.001). The mean MOCART score at 1-year follow-up was 74.1 ± 12.4 (range 50–95). Both preoperative and postoperative pains were significantly higher for smokers when compared to non-smokers.

Conclusions

The results of the present study study indicate that AMIC procedure can be performed through the anterolateral and anteromedial arthrotomy without malleolar osteotomy. Thus, the possible complications associated with malleolar osteotomy can be avoided. The AMIC procedure without a malleolar osteotomy can be considered a safe and reliable procedure in patients with osteochondral lesions localized anterior to the midline in the sagittal plane.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic case series, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amendola A, Panarella L (2009) Osteochondral lesions: medial versus lateral, persistent pain, cartilage restoration options and indications. Foot Ankle Clin 14:215–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barg A, Harris MD, Henninger HB, Amendola RL, Saltzman CL, Hintermann B et al (2012) Medial distal tibial angle: comparison between weightbearing mortise view and hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int 33:655–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barg A, Pagenstert G, Leumann A, Valderrabano V (2013) Malleolar osteotomy–osteotomy as approach. Orthopade 42:309–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE (1991) The foot function index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol 44:561–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dahmen J, Lambers KTA, Reilingh ML, van Bergen CJA, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs G (2017) No superior treatment for primary osteochondral defects of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4616-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. de Leeuw PA, Golano P, Clavero JA, van Dijk CN (2010) Anterior ankle arthroscopy, distraction or dorsiflexion? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:594–600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferreira C, Vuurberg G, Oliveira JM, Espregueira-Mendes J, Pereira H, Reis RL et al (2016) Good clinical outcome after osteochondral autologous transplantation surgery for osteochondral lesions of the talus but at the cost of high rate of complications: a systematic review. JISAKOS 0:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  8. Galla M, Lobenhoffer P (2011) Technique and results of arthroscopic treatment of posterior ankle impingement. Foot Ankle Surg 17:79–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Georgiannos D, Bisbinas I, Badekas A (2016) Osteochondral transplantation of autologous graft for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of talus: 5- to 7-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3722–3729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giza E, Sullivan M, Ocel D, Lundeen G, Mitchell ME, Veris L et al (2010) Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of talus articular defects. Foot Ankle Int 31:747–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hepple S, Winson IG, Glew D (1999) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a revised classification. Foot Ankle Int 20:789–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2:1127–1131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung HG, Kim NR, Jeon JY, Lee DO, Eom JS, Lee JS et al (2017) CT arthrography visualizes tissue growth of osteochondral defects of the talus after microfracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2123–2130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kubosch EJ, Erdle B, Izadpanah K, Kubosch D, Uhl M, Sudkamp NP et al (2016) Clinical outcome and T2 assessment following autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in osteochondral lesions of the talus. Int Orthop 40:65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee KT, Kim JS, Young KW, Lee YK, Park YU, Kim YH et al (2013) The use of fibrin matrix-mixed gel-type autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1251–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leumann A, Horisberger M, Buettner O, Mueller-Gerbl M, Valderrabano V (2016) Medial malleolar osteotomy for the treatment of talar osteochondral lesions: anatomical and morbidity considerations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2133–2139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindsjo U, Danckwardt-Lilliestrom G, Sahlstedt B (1985) Measurement of the motion range in the loaded ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 199:68–71

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muir D, Saltzman CL, Tochigi Y, Amendola N (2006) Talar dome access for osteochondral lesions. Am J Sports Med 34:1457–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Polat G, Ersen A, Erdil ME, Kizilkurt T, Kilicoglu O, Asik M (2016) Long-term results of microfracture in the treatment of talus osteochondral lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1299–1303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ross AW, Murawski CD, Fraser EJ, Ross KA, Do HT, Deyer TW et al (2016) Autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus: does previous bone marrow stimulation negatively affect clinical outcome? Arthroscopy 32:1377–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Usuelli FG, de Girolamo L, Grassi M, D’Ambrosi R, Montrasio UA, Boga M (2015) All-arthroscopic autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Arthrosc Tech 4:e255–e259

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Valderrabano V, Miska M, Leumann A, Wiewiorski M (2013) Reconstruction of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous spongiosa grafts and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis. Am J Sports Med 41:519–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Bergen CJ, Tuijthof GJ, Blankevoort L, Maas M, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN (2012) Computed tomography of the ankle in full plantar flexion: a reliable method for preoperative planning of arthroscopic access to osteochondral defects of the talus. Arthroscopy 28:985–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. VanTienderen RJ, Dunn JC, Kusnezov N, Orr JD (2017) Osteochondral allograft transfer for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 33:217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Verghese N, Morgan A, Perera A (2013) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: defining the surgical approach. Foot Ankle Clin 18:49–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Verhagen RA, Struijs PA, Bossuyt PM, van Dijk CN (2003) Systematic review of treatment strategies for osteochondral defects of the talar dome. Foot Ankle Clin 8:233–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiewiorski M, Barg A, Valderrabano V (2013) Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Clin 18:151–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiewiorski M, Barg A, Valderrabano V (2013) Chondral and osteochondral reconstruction of local ankle degeneration. Foot Ankle Clin 18:543–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wiewiorski M, Werner L, Paul J, Anderson AE, Barg A, Valderrabano V (2016) Sports activity after reconstruction of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous spongiosa grafts and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis. Am J Sports Med 44:2651–2658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Young KW, Deland JT, Lee KT, Lee YK (2010) Medial approaches to osteochondral lesion of the talus without medial malleolar osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:634–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN (2010) Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:238–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zengerink M, van Dijk CN (2012) Complications in ankle arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1420–1431

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Maxwell Weinberg, BS (Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) for his help with manuscript correction and editing review.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Department, MVZ Alfelder Strasse, Alfelder Str. 109a, Hildesheim, Germany

    Mellany Galla

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA

    Ian Duensing, Timothy L. Kahn & Alexej Barg

Authors
  1. Mellany Galla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ian Duensing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Timothy L. Kahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexej Barg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexej Barg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The institutional review board (Ärztekammer Niedersachsen, 059/2015) approved this retrospective study, and informed consent was waived.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galla, M., Duensing, I., Kahn, T.L. et al. Open reconstruction with autologous spongiosa grafts and matrix-induced chondrogenesis for osteochondral lesions of the talus can be performed without medial malleolar osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 2789–2795 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5063-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5063-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation