Abstract
Purpose
Data regarding knee arthroplasty and lawsuit are scarce. With the expected increase in knee arthroplasty over the next 25 years, the number of claims might follow the same trend. Therefore, the most frequent causes of litigation after knee arthroplasty in France, and what is considered as malpractice by the expert, were determined.
Methods
Over 8-year period, data gathered from a French private insurance company specializing in malpractice for private practitioners were analyzed. Demographics, type of knee arthroplasty, reason for claim, details of the legal procedure and the expert’s decision were reviewed.
Results
One hundred and five claims were processed by four jurisdictions. Most of the cases concerned primary total knee arthroplasty. Surgeons and anesthesiologists were charged in 84 and 16 % of claims, respectively. The most frequent causes of litigation were infection, neurological deficit and unsatisfactory result, whereas the most common reasons for the surgeon’s liability, as stated by the expert, were delay in diagnosis or treatment of a complication, infection and technical error.
Conclusion
Our findings show that frequent complications are not those which raise most of the claims. Patients sue the surgeon when the outcome of the surgery is different from what they were expecting. An unsatisfactory result, according to the patient’s point of view, is the second most frequent cause of claim.
Level of evidence
IV, Economic and Decision Analysis. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attarian DE, Vail TP (2005) Medicolegal aspects of hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433:72–76
Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ (2010) The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):45–51
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383
Gidwani S, Zaidi SMR, Bircher MD (2009) Medical negligence in orthopaedic surgery: a review of 130 consecutive medical negligence reports. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(2):151–156
Gould MT, Langworthy MJ, Santore R, Provencher MT (2003) An analysis of orthopaedic liability in the acute care setting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:59–66
Jarvelin J, Hakkinen U, Rosenqvist G, Remes V (2012) Factors predisposing to claims and compensations for patient injuries following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83(2):190–196
Kachalia A, Kaufman SR, Boothman R, Anderson S, Welch K, Saint S, Rogers MAM (2010) Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Ann Intern Med 153(4):213–221
Kasahara Y, Majima T, Kimura S, Nishiike O, Uchida J (2013) What are the causes of revision total knee arthroplasty in Japan? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(5):1533–1538
Klimo GF, Daum WJ, Brinker MR, McGuire E, Elliott MN (2000) Orthopedic medical malpractice: an attorney’s perspective. Am J Orthop 29(2):93–97
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785
Marmor S, Farman T (2011) Medicolegal aspects of total hip arthroplasty. Rev Chirur Orthop 97:752–757
Marmor S, Farman T, Lortat-Jacob A (2009) Joint infection after knee arthroscopy: medicolegal aspects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(4):278–283
McGrory BJ, Bal BS, York S, Macaulay W, McConnell DB (2009) Surgeon demographics and medical malpractice in adult reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(2):358–366
McWilliams AB, Douglas SL, Redmond AC, Grainger AJ, O’Connor PJ, Stewart TD, Stone MH (2013) Litigation after hip and knee replacement in the National Health Service. Bone Joint J 95-B(1):122–126
Suk M, Udale AM, Helfet DL (2005) Orthopaedics and the law. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(6):397–406
Taragin MI, Sonnenberg FA, Karns ME, Trout R, Shapiro S, Carson JL (1994) Does physician performance explain interspecialty differences in malpractice claim rates? Med Care 32(7):661–667
Traina F (2009) Medical malpractice: the experience in Italy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(2):434–442
Upadhyay A, York S, Macaulay W, McGrory B, Robbennolt J, Bal BS (2007) Medical malpractice in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2):2–7
van Kempen RWTM, Schimmel JJP, van Hellemondt GG, Vandenneucker H, Wymenga AB (2013) Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(7):2296–2302
Zmistowski B, Restrepo C, Kahl LK, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF (2011) Incidence and reasons for nonrevision reoperation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(1):138–145
Acknowledgments
We thank Zoe Titley (University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) who helped in editing this article as well as the MACSF, which provided data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibon, E., Farman, T. & Marmor, S. Knee arthroplasty and lawsuits: the experience in France. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 3723–3728 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3292-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3292-y