Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A two- and five-year follow-up of clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction using BPTB or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective intervention outcome study

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare objective and subjective outcome in patients 2 and 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring grafts. The second aim was to report the prevalence of re- and contralateral ACL ruptures.

Methods

Sixty-eight patients (BPTB, n = 34 and hamstring graft, n = 34) were evaluated preoperatively, 2 and 5 years after ACL reconstruction. Anterior knee laxity and rotational knee joint stability, muscle torque, hop length, anterior knee pain, activity level and self-reported knee function and quality of life were evaluated within and between groups. The prevalence of re- and contralateral ACL ruptures was also recorded.

Results

No significant difference in anterior knee laxity, rotational knee joint stability, hop length anterior knee pain or knee function and quality of life were noted at the 5-year follow-up. No significant differences in concentric or eccentric quadriceps torque at 90°/s and 230°/s were found at any of the follow-ups between and within grafts. A significant group difference in hamstring torque 1.05 (0.02) for BPTB and 0.89 (0.02) for hamstring grafts, and in hop length (leg symmetry index) follow-up 0.94 (0.07) for BPTB compared to 0.99 (0.07) for hamstring grafts (P = 0.002) was found at the 2 year follow-up in favour of the BPTB graft, but not at the 5 year follow-up. A significant improvement over time, irrespective of graft, was found in the KOOS′s subscales Sport/Rec and quality of life (P < 0.001). None of the patients, irrespective of group, returned to their pre-injury level of sport (P < 0.05). Over the five postoperative years, one man and eight women (13 %) (hamstring graft, n = 5 and BPTB graft, n = 4), sustained a total of 11 (16.2 %) new ACL ruptures: seven (10.2 %) re-ruptures and four (5.9 %) ruptures of the contralateral ACL.

Conclusions

At the 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in terms of anterior knee laxity, rotational knee joint stability, muscle torque, anterior knee pain, hop performance, quality of life or activity level between patients who had undergone reconstruction with BPTB or hamstring grafts. None of the patients, irrespective of group, had returned to their pre-injury level of activity. Eight out of the nine patients who had sustained a second ACL rupture were women.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams D, Logerstedt D, Giordano-Hunter A, Axe M, Snyder-Mackler L (2012) Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression. JOSPT 42:601–614

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ageberg E, Roos PH, Grävare Silbernagel K, Thomeé R, Roos EM (2009) Knee extension and flexion muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft or hamstring tendons graft: a cross-sectional comparison 3 years post surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:162–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahldén M, Samuelsson K, Fu FH, Musahl V, Karlsson J (2013) Rotatory knee laxity. Clin Sports Med 32:37–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2012) Fear of re-injury in people who have returned to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Sci Med Sports 15:488–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2012) Return-to sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 40:41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Karlsson J (2004) Ability of a new hop test to determine functional deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:350–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, McCloskey JW, Hartman W (1990) Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:204–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz PJ, Nizard RS (2006) Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis. BMJ 332:995–1001

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrell M, Richards JG (1986) Analysis of the reliability and validity of the kinetic communicator exercise device. Med Sci Sports Exerc 18:180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feller J, Webster KE (2013) Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 37:285–290

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujita N, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T, Yamaguchi M, Yagi M, Matsumoto A, Kubo S, Matsushita T, Hoshino Y, Nishimoto K, Araki D, Kurosaka M (2011) Comparison of the clinical outcome of double-bundle, anteromedial single-bundle, and posterolateral single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27:906–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gifstad T, Sole A, Strand T, Uppheim G, Grøntvedt T, Drogset JO (2013) Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arhtrosc 21(3):576–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heijne A, Werner S (2007) Early versus late start of open kinetic chain quadriceps exercises after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring grafts: a prospective randomized outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:402–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heijne A, Werner S (2010) A 2-year follow-up of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective randomised outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:805–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koga H, Nakamae A, Shima Y, Iwasa J, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Bahr R, Krosshaug T (2010) Mechanisms for noncontact anterior ligament injuries: knee joint kinematics in 10 injury situations from female handball and basketball. Am J Sports Med 21:271–274

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, Good L (2005) Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:393–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lautamies R, Harilainen A, Kettunen J, Sandelin J, Kujala UM (2008) Isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength and knee function 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1009–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Hansson L, Heidvall M, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J (2005) A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21:34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee DYH, Karim SA, Chang HC (2008) Return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a review of patients with minimum 5-year follow-up. Ann Acad Med Singapore 37:273–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leys T, Salmon L, Waller A, Linklater J, Pinczewski L (2012) Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective study of hamstrings and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med 40:595–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li S, Chen Y, Lin Z, Cui W, Zhao J, Su W (2012) A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials comparing hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1287–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Little RJ, Raghunathan T (1999) On summary measures analysis of the linear mixed effects model for repeated measures when data are not missing completely at random. Stat Med 18(17–18):2465–2478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Magnussen RA, Carey JL, Spindler KP (2011) Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:462–472

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Månsson O, Kartus J, Sernert N (2011) Health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:479–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mascarenhas R, Tranovich MJ, Kropf EJ, Fu FH, Harner CD (2012) Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete: a retrospective matched analysis with 2–10 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1520–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mikkelsen C (2006) Thesis: rehabilitation following bone-patellar tendon-bone graft ACL reconstruction. Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. ISBN 91-7140-913-0

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mohtadi NGH, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults (Review). The Cochrane Libr, 9: CD005960

  29. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:439–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Salmon L, Russell V, Musgrove T, Pinczewski L, Refshauge K (2005) Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21:948–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Samuelsson K, Daniel Andersson D, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 25:1139–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shelbourne KD, Gray T, Haro M (2009) Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 37:246–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sutton KL, Bullock JM (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament rupture: differences between males and females. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:41–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Swedish National ACL-register. http://www.artroclinic.se/scripts/cgiip.exe/WService=skreg/xb_index. 01 June 2013

  36. Taylor DC, DeBerardino TM, Nelson BJ, Duffey M, Tenuta J, Stoneman PD, Sturdivant RX, Mountcastle S (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods. Am J Sports Med 37:1946–1957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thomeé R, Kaplan Y, Kvist J, Myklebust G, Risberg MA, Theisen D, Tsepis E, Werner S, Wondrasch B, Witvrouw E (2011) Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1798–1805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Thomeé R, Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomeé P, Augustsson J, Eriksson B, Karlsson J (2012) Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(6):1143–1151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wipfler B, Donner S, Zechmann CM, Jan Springer J, Siebold R, Paessler HH (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon: a prospective comparative study with 9-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27:653–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wright RW, Magnussen RA, Dunn WR, Spindler KP (2011) Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1159–1165

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wroble RR, Van Ginkel LA, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Shaffer BL (1990) Repeatability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in a normal population. Am J Sports Med 18:396–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our grateful thanks to the patients for sharing their time with us.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, SE-141 86 Huddinge, 23100, Stockholm, Sweden

    Annette Heijne & Maria Hagströmer

  2. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Annette Heijne & Suzanne Werner

  3. Capio Artro Clinic, Sophiahemmet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Suzanne Werner

Authors
  1. Annette Heijne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Hagströmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Suzanne Werner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annette Heijne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heijne, A., Hagströmer, M. & Werner, S. A two- and five-year follow-up of clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction using BPTB or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective intervention outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 799–807 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2727-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2727-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation