Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The combination of radiostereometric analysis and the telos stress device results in poor precision for knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Several devices for measuring knee laxity following anterior cruciate ligament ACL reconstruction exist, but the precision of the methods has never been optimal. Therefore, a new standardized protocol (NSP) was made, aiming at ensuring a reliable positioning of the Telos Stress Device (TSD) which theoretically could result in precise knee laxity measurements when using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in combination with TSD.

Method

The TSD was applied to the knee of 30 healthy persons, using both the NSP and the official company instructions. The position of the stress arms of the TSD was marked following each measurement. The reliability of each protocol was calculated as the difference in length between the first and second markings. The NSP for the TSD was then used in a clinical study. Thirty-five patients underwent ACL reconstruction. Double measurements of knee laxity by RSA were performed at a 3-month follow-up.

Results

Using the NSP for TSD positioning, the prediction interval at the marking sites ranged from ±0.4 to ±1.1 mm. Following the company instructions, the prediction interval ranged from ±0.8 to ±3.9 mm depending on marking site. Thus, the precision of positioning the stress arms of the TSD was improved at all marking sites using the NSP compared with the original company protocol. The double measurements of the knee laxity in the clinical study resulted in a mean difference of 0.0 mm and a prediction interval of ±5.2 mm.

Conclusion

Even though the NSP improved the positioning of the TSD on patients’ extremities, the combination of NSP-TSD and RSA was not able to provide acceptable knee laxity measurements in a clinical setting compared with published precision data for other devices on the market. Therefore, the Telos Stress Device is not recommendable for use in knee laxity measurements following ACL reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson D, Samuelsson K, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to surgical technique and rehabilitation: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 25:653–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bach BR Jr, Warren RF, Flynn WM, Kroll M, Wickiewiecz TL (1990) Arthrometric evaluation of knees that have a torn anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1299–1306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balasch H, Schiller M, Friebel H, Hoffmann F (1999) Evaluation of anterior knee joint instability with the Rolimeter. A test in comparison with manual assessment and measuring with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:204–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R, Malcom L (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med 13:401–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleming BC, Brattbakk B, Peura GD, Badger GJ, Beynnon BD (2002) Measurement of anterior-posterior knee laxity: a comparison of three techniques. J Orthop Res 20:421–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleming BC, Peura GD, Abate JA, Beynnon BD (2001) Accuracy and repeatability of Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) for measuring knee laxity in longitudinal studies. J Biomech 34:1355–1359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Friden T, Ryd L, Lindstrand A (1992) Laxity and graft fixation after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of 11 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 63:80–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Friden T, Sommerlath K, Egund N, Gillquist J, Ryd L, Lindstrand A (1992) Instability after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Measurements of sagittal laxity compared in 11 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 63:593–598

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganko A, Engebretsen L, Ozer H (2000) The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:36–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garofalo R, Fanelli GC, Cikes A, N’Dele D, Kombot C, Mariani PP, Mouhsine E (2009) Stress radiography and posterior pathological laxity of knee: comparison between two different techniques. Knee 16:251–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hatcher J, Hatcher A, Arbuthnot J, McNicholas M (2005) An investigation to examine the inter-tester and intra-tester reliability of the Rolimeter knee tester, and its sensitivity in identifying knee joint laxity. J Orthop Res 23:1399–1403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Highgenboten CL, Jackson A, Meske NB (1989) Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons. Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Sports Med 17:743–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Highgenboten CL, Jackson AW, Jansson KA, Meske NB (1992) KT-1000 arthrometer: conscious and unconscious test results using 15, 20, and 30 pounds of force. Am J Sports Med 20:450–454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Isberg J, Faxen E, Brandsson S, Eriksson BI, Karrholm J, Karlsson J (2006) Early active extension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not result in increased laxity of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1108–1115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Isberg J, Faxen E, Brandsson S, Eriksson BI, Karrholm J, Karlsson J (2006) KT-1000 records smaller side-to-side differences than radiostereometric analysis before and after an ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:529–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jonsson H, Elmqvist LG, Karrholm J, Fugl-Meyer A (1992) Lengthening of anterior cruciate ligament graft. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of 32 cases 2 years after repair. Acta Orthop Scand 63:587–592

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jonsson H, Karrholm J, Elmqvist LG (1993) Laxity after cruciate ligament injury in 94 knees. The KT-1000 arthrometer versus roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthop Scand 64:567–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75:594–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jorn LP, Friden T, Ryd L, Lindstrand A (1997) Persistent stability 3 years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A radiostereometric analysis (RSA) of 20 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 68:427–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jorn LP, Friden T, Ryd L, Lindstrand A (1998) Simultaneous measurements of sagittal knee laxity with an external device and radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:169–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jung TM, Reinhardt C, Scheffler SU, Weiler A (2006) Stress radiography to measure posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a comparison of five different techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1116–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Karrholm J, Selvik G, Elmqvist LG, Hansson LI (1988) Active knee motion after cruciate ligament rupture. Stereoradiography. Acta Orthop Scand 59:158–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karrholm J, Selvik G, Elmqvist LG, Hansson LI, Jonsson H (1988) Three-dimensional instability of the anterior cruciate deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:777–783

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khan R, Konyves A, Rama KR, Thomas R, Amis AA (2006) RSA can measure ACL graft stretching and migration: development of a new method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:139–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee SH, Jung YB, Jung HJ, Song KS, Ko YB (2010) Combined reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability with anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1078-4

  27. Malcom LL, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R (1985) The measurement of anterior knee laxity after ACL reconstructive surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 196:35–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Muellner T, Bugge W, Johansen S, Holtan C, Engebretsen L (2001) Inter- and intratester comparison of the Rolimeter knee tester: effect of tester’s experience and the examination technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:302–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Papandreou MG, Antonogiannakis E, Karabalis C, Karliaftis K (2005) Inter-rater reliability of Rolimeter measurements between anterior cruciate ligament injured and normal contra lateral knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:592–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rangger C, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Kaufman K (1993) Diagnosis of an ACL disruption with KT-1000 arthrometer measurements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:60–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schulz MS, Russe K, Lampakis G, Strobel MJ (2005) Reliability of stress radiography for evaluation of posterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 33:502–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Selvik G (1989) Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 232:1–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Staubli HU, Jakob RP (1991) Anterior knee motion analysis. Measurement and simultaneous radiography. Am J Sports Med 19:172–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Staubli HU, Noesberger B, Jakob RP (1992) Stressradiography of the knee. Cruciate ligament function studied in 138 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 249:1–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Steiner ME, Brown C, Zarins B, Brownstein B, Koval PS, Stone P (1990) Measurement of anterior-posterior displacement of the knee. A comparison of the results with instrumented devices and with clinical examination. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1307–1315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Torzilli PA, Panariello RA, Forbes A, Santner TJ, Warren RF (1991) Measurement reproducibility of two commercial knee test devices. J Orthop Res 9:730–737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tsai AG, Musahl V, Steckel H, Bell KM, Zantop T, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2008) Rotational knee laxity: reliability of a simple measurement device in vivo. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Weninger P, Zifko B, Liska M, Spitaler R, Pelinka H, Hertz H (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts and double biodegradable femoral cross-pin fixation: functional, radiographic and MRI outcome after 2-year minimum follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:988–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wroble RR, Van Ginkel LA, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Shaffer BL (1990) Repeatability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in a normal population. Am J Sports Med 18:396–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Research Unit, Hospital Unit West, Laegaardvej 12, 7500, Holstebro, Denmark

    O. G. Sørensen, K. Larsen & T. B. Hansen

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Aarhus, Tage Hansensgade 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark

    O. G. Sørensen, M. Lind & K. Søballe

  3. Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Aalborg, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100, Aalborg, Denmark

    S. Kold

  4. Eira Private Hospital, Science Center Skejby, Brendstrupgaardsvej 21, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark

    B. W. Jakobsen

Authors
  1. O. G. Sørensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. W. Jakobsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Kold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. B. Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Lind
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. K. Søballe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. G. Sørensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sørensen, O.G., Larsen, K., Jakobsen, B.W. et al. The combination of radiostereometric analysis and the telos stress device results in poor precision for knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 355–362 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1205-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1205-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation