Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint in athletes

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective randomized clinical study was to compare the outcomes of mosaic type autologous osteochondral transplantation (OAT) and microfracture (MF) procedures for the treatment of the articular cartilage defects of the knee joint in athletes. Between 1998 and 2002, a total of 57 athletes with a mean age of 24.3 years and with a symptomatic lesion of the articular cartilage in the knee were randomized to undergo either OAT or MF procedure. There were 28 athletes in OAT group and 29 in MF group. Patients were evaluated using a modified Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scores, MRI and clinical assessment after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after the surgery. According to the modified HSS and ICRS scores, functional and objective assessment showed that 96% had excellent or good results after OAT compared with 52% after MF procedure (P<0.001). In 12, 24 and 36 months after the operations, the HSS and ICRS showed statistically significantly better results in the OAT group (P=0.03; P=0.006; P=0.006). Twenty-six (93%) athletes following OAT and fifteen (52%) athletes following MF returned to sports activities at the preinjury level at an average of 6.5 months (range, 4–8 months) after the operations. At an average of 37.1 months follow-up, our prospective, randomized, clinical study in athletes has shown significant superiority of the OAT over MF for the repair of articular cartilage defects in the knee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Ciardullo A, Giron F, Paonteggia F (2001) Results of arthroscopic excision of the fragment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Arthroscopy 17(7):741–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson A (1997) Antegrade drilling for osteochondritis dissecans. Arthroscopy 13(3):319–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber FA, Chow JC (2001) Arthroscopic osteochondral transplantation: histologic results. Arthroscopy 17(8):832–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bentley G, Biant LC, Carrington RW, Akmal M, Goldberg A, Williams AM, Skinner JA, Pringle J (2003) A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:223–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blevins FT, Steadman JR, Rodrigo JJ, Silliman J (1998) Treatment of articular cartilage defects in athletes: an analysis of functional outcome and lesion appearance. Orthopedics 21:761–768

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bobic V (1996) Arthroscopic osteochondral autogenous graft transplantation in anterior cruciate reconstruction: a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3:262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, et al. (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. New England J Med 331:889–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(Suppl 2):58–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frisbie DD, Oxford JT, Southwood L, Trotter GW, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR, Goodnight JL, McIlwraith CW (2003) Early events in cartilage repair after subchondral bone microfracture. Clin Orthop 407:215–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gobbi A, Nunag P, Malinowski K (2005) Treatment of full thickness chondral lesions of the knee with microfracture in a group of athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(3):213–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gold GE, Bergman AG, Pauly JM, Lang P, Butts RK, Beaulieu CF, Hargreaves B, Frank L, Boutin RD, Macovski A, Resnick D (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage repair. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9:377–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gudas R (2002) Autologous osteochondral transplantation (mosaicplasty) for the treatment of femoral condyle defects. Medicina 38 (1):52–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gudas R, Kalesinskas RJ (2003) Osteochondral transplantation for the treatment of femoral condyle defects. Medicina 39 (5):469–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hangody L, Füles P (2003) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:25–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hangody L, Rathonyi GK, Duska Z, Vasarhelyi G, Fules P, Modis L (2004) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86A(Suppl 1):65–72

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hangody L, Feczko P, Bartha L, Bodo G, Kish G (2001) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular defects of the knee and ankle. Clin Orthop 391(Suppl):S328–S336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Szerb I, Udvarhelyi I (1997) Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects. A preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5(4):262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Udvarhelyi I, Szigeti I, Bely M (1998) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular cartilage defects: application in clinical practice. Orthopedics 21(7):751–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z, Szerb I, Udvarhelyi I (1997) Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects. A preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoikka VE, Jaroma HJ, Ritsila VA (1990) Reconstruction of the patellar articulation with periosteal grafts: 4-year follow-up of 13 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 61:36–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T, Schnettler R (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint. A prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 5:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hunziker EB (2002) Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthr Cartil 10(6):432–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jerosch J, Filler T, Peuker E (2000) Is there an option for harvesting autologous osteochondral grafts without damaging weight-bearing areas in the knee joint? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(4):237–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson LL (1986) Arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty historical and pathologic perspective: present status. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 2(1):54–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Korkala OL, Kuokkanen HO (1995) Autoarthroplasty of knee cartilage defects by osteoperiosteal grafts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114:253–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC, Drogset JO, Grontvedt T, Solheim E, Strand T, Roberts S, Isaksen V, Johansen O (2004) Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86A(3):455–64

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lorentzon R, Alfredson H, Hildingsson C (1998) Treatment of deep cartilage defects of the patella with periosteal transplantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy 6:202–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Outerbridge HK, Outerbridge AR, Outerbridge RE (1995) The use of a lateral patellar autologous graft for the repair of a large osteochondral defect in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(1):65–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Outerbridge HK, Outerbridge RE, Smith DE (2000) Osteochondral defects in the knee. A treatment using lateral patella autografts. Clin Orthop 377:145–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodrigo JJ, Steadman RJ, Silliman JF, et al (1994) Improvement of full-thickness chondral defect healing in the human knee after debridement and microfracture using continuous passive motion. Am J Knee Surg 7:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sgaglione NA, Miniaci A, Gillogly SD, Carter TR (2002) Update on advanced surgical techniques in the treatment of traumatic focal articular cartilage lesions in the knee. Arthroscopy 18(2):9–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Solheim E (1999) Mosaicplasty in articular cartilage injuries of the knee. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen Norwegian 119:4022–4025

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Kocher MS, Gill TJ, Rodkey WG (2003) Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 5:477–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Steadman JR, Miller BS, Karas SG, Schlegel TF, Briggs KK, Hawkins RJ (2003) The microfracture technique in the treatment of full-thickness chondral lesions of the knee in National Football League players. J Knee Surg 16(2):83–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK (2002) Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects. J Knee Surg 3:170–176

    Google Scholar 

  36. Steadman RJ, Rodkey WG, Singleton SB, Briggs KK (1997) Microfracture technique for full thickness chondral defects: technique and clinical results. Oper Tech Orthop 7:300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Kaunas University Hospital, Kaunas Medical University, Eivenių str. 2, 50009, Kaunas, Lithuania

    Rimtautas Gudas & Romas J. Kalesinskas

  2. Department of Physiology, Kaunas University Hospital, Kaunas Medical University, Eivenių str. 2, 50009, Kaunas, Lithuania

    Edgaras Stankevičius

  3. Department of Radiology, Kaunas University Hospital, Kaunas Medical University, Eivenių str. 2, 50009, Kaunas, Lithuania

    Eglė Monastyreckienė

  4. Department of Pathology, Kaunas University Hospital, Kaunas Medical University, Eivenių str. 2, 50009, Kaunas, Lithuania

    Darius Pranys

Authors
  1. Rimtautas Gudas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edgaras Stankevičius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eglė Monastyreckienė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Darius Pranys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Romas J. Kalesinskas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rimtautas Gudas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gudas, R., Stankevičius, E., Monastyreckienė, E. et al. Osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 14, 834–842 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0067-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0067-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation