Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic in-vivo tibio-femoral and bearing motions in mobile bearing knee arthroplasty

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

To determine the tibio-femoral and bearing motions in well functioning mobile bearing total knee arthroplasties, a quantitative analysis by means of fluoroscopy was carried out during stair ascending, chair rising-sitting and step up-down motor tasks. Femoral and tibial component positions were obtained using a CAD-model-based shape matching technique. Direct measurement of mobile bearing motion was carried out by tracking previously inserted tantalum beads. A relatively small motion of the bearing was observed. The advantage of self-alignment claimed for the mobile bearing arthroplasty seems to be confirmed by subject-specific ranges of motion exhibited by these patients. It has also been demonstrated that these total knee arthroplasties, which are not fully conforming in flexion, provide little constraint to antero-posterior motion, leading to a kinematic pattern very similar to an ACL deficient knee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2a–c.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banks SA, Hodge WA (1996) Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43:638–649

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banks SA, Markovich GD, Hodge WA (1997) In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. J.Arthroplasty 12:297–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Banks SA, Markovich GD, Hodge WA (1997) The mechanics of knee replacements during gait. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of two designs. Am J Knee Surg 10:261–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bercovy M (2001) Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A: 1113–1114

  5. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Murray DW, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Dorr LD (2001) Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 50:431–449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (2000) Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve- year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:705–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE Jr., Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS, Lapp MA (1998) In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM (1996) In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop:107–117

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Walker SA, Cheal EJ, Stiehl JB (2001) Femoral condylar lift-off in vivo in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:33–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three- dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136–144

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heim CS, Postak PD, Plaxton NA, Greenwald AS (2001) Classification of mobile-bearing knee designs: mobility and constraint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A Suppl 2:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoff WA, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Gabriel SM, Walker SA (1998) Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. Clin Biomech 13:455–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jordan LR, Olivo JL, Voorhorst PE (1997) Survivorship analysis of cementless meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop:119–123

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaper BP, Smith PN, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Robertson D (1999) Medium-term results of a mobile bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop:201–209

    Google Scholar 

  15. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mabe JA, Walker SA (2000) An in vivo determination of patellofemoral contact positions. Clin Biomech 15:29–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pratt W (1991) Geometric distortion correction. In: Digital image processing. Wiley, New York, pp 429–432

  18. Psychoyios V, Crawford RW, O'Connor JJ, Murray DW (1998) Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:976–982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramsey DK, Wretenberg PF (1999) Biomechanics of the knee: methodological considerations in the in vivo kinematic analysis of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint. Clin Biomech 14:595–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryd L, Boegard T, Egund N, Lindstrand A, Selvik G, Thorngren KG (1983) Migration of the tibial component in successful unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A clinical, radiographic and roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. Acta Orthop Scand 54:408–416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Crane HS (1999) In vivo determination of condylar lift-off and screw-home in a mobile- bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:293–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PA (1997) In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop:60–66

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PA (2000) In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 13:13–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA (2000) The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of two total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15:545–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA (1999) Detrimental kinematics of a flat on flat total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Paxson RD, Hoff WA (1995) Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:884–889

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Wenger KH, Wirth CJ (2002) Relative motion of a mobile bearing inlay after total knee arthroplasty—dynamic in vitro study. Clin Biomech 17:49–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Walker PS, Komistek RD, Barrett DS, Anderson D, Dennis DA, Sampson M (2002) Motion of a mobile bearing knee allowing translation and rotation. J Arthroplasty 17:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Walker PS, Sathasivam S (1999) The design of guide surfaces for fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Biomech 32:27–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by Stryker/Howmedica/Ostetonics Inc. Experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Fantozzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fantozzi, S., Leardini, A., Banks, S.A. et al. Dynamic in-vivo tibio-femoral and bearing motions in mobile bearing knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12, 144–151 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0384-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0384-5

Keywords

Navigation