Abstract
This brief note presents some observations about the modelling of stress constraints in fail-safe structural optimization considering local degradation of member properties. An analytical study of a three-bar example demonstrates the impact of the constraint modelling choices on the optimal design. One notable finding is that degradation of one arbitrary member may cause a worse objective function than complete removal of the member. The observation is similar to the singular optimum issue in topology optimization with stress constraints, but applies also to sizing problems. This deserves special attention and should be considered when modelling fail-safe structural optimization with stress constraints.
References
Achtziger W, Bendsøe MP (1999) Optimal topology design of discrete structures resisting degradation effects. Struct Optim 17(1):74–78
Ambrozkiewicz O, Kriegesmann B (2020) Density-based shape optimization for fail-safe design. J Comput Des Eng 7(5):615–629
Cheng G, Jiang Z (1992) Study on topology optimization with stress constraints. Eng Optim 20(2):129–148
Jansen M, Lombaert G, Schevenels M, Sigmund O (2014) Topology optimization of fail-safe structures using a simplified local damage model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(4):657–666
Kirsch U (1990) On singular topologies in optimum structural design. Struct Optim 2(3):133–142
Lüdeker JK, Kriegesmann B (2019) Fail-safe optimization of beam structures. J Comput Des Eng 6(3):260–268
Peng XP, Sui Y (2018) ICM method for fail-safe topology optimization of continuum structures. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 50(3):611–621
Pollini N (2020) Fail-safe optimization of viscous dampers for seismic retrofitting. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 49(15):1599–1618
Rozvany G (2001) On design-dependent constraints and topologies. Struct Multidiscip Optim 21:164–172
Stolpe M (2019) Fail-safe truss topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(4):1605–1618
Sun P, Arora J, Haug E (1976) Fail-safe optimal design of structures. Eng Optim 2(1):43–53
Sved G, Ginos Z (1968) Structural optimization under multiple loading. Int J Mech Sci 10(10):803–805
Zhou M, Fleury R (2016) Fail-safe topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(5):1225–1243
Acknowledgements
We thank our colleague Nicolo Pollini for fruitful discussions on fail-safe design in general and his insightful suggestions on how to improve this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Independent Research Fund Denmark under grant number 7017-00084A: Fail-Safe Structural Optimization (SELMA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Julián Andrés Norato
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Replication of results
The model descriptions and parameters and the key analytical results are described in the note. Detailed models and analytical results are provided in the supplementary material.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 107 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dou, S., Stolpe, M. On stress-constrained fail-safe structural optimization considering partial damage. Struct Multidisc Optim 63, 929–933 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02782-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02782-2