Skip to main content
Log in

On some fundamental properties of structural topology optimization problems

  • Educational Article
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study some fundamental mathematical properties of discretized structural topology optimization problems. Either compliance is minimized with an upper bound on the volume of the structure, or volume is minimized with an upper bound on the compliance. The design variables are either continuous or 0–1. We show, by examples which can be solved by hand calculations, that the optimal solutions to the problems in general are not unique and that the discrete problems possibly have inactive volume or compliance constraints. These observations have immediate consequences on the theoretical convergence properties of penalization approaches based on material interpolation models. Furthermore, we illustrate that the optimal solutions to the considered problems in general are not symmetric even if the design domain, the external loads, and the boundary conditions are symmetric around an axis. The presented examples can be used as teaching material in graduate and undergraduate courses on structural topology optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Achtziger W (1998) Multiple load truss topology and sizing optimization: some properties of minimax compliance. J Optim Theory Appl 98:255–280

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Achtziger W, Stolpe M (2005) Global optimization of truss topology w.r.t. discrete bar areas—part I: theory of relaxed problems. Tech. Rep. No. 308, Institute of Applied Mathematics, University of Dortmund

  • Achtziger W, Stolpe M (2007) Truss topology optimization with discrete design variables—guaranteed global optimality and benchmark examples. Struct Multidisc Optim 34(1):1–20

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Achtziger W, Stolpe M (2008) Global optimization of truss topology with discrete bar areas—part I: theory of relaxed problems. Comput Optim Appl 40:247–280

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Achtziger W, Bendsøe M, Ben-Tal A, Zowe J (1992) Equivalent displacement based formulations for maximum strength truss topology design. Impact Comput Sci Eng 4:315–345

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosio L, Buttazzo G (1994) An optimal design problem with perimeter penalization. Calc Var Partial Differ Equ 1:55–69

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Bendsøe M (1993) A new method for optimal truss topology design. SIAM J Optim 3(2):322–358

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1995) Optimal design of engineering structures. OPTIMA Mathematical Programming Society Newsletter No. 47

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1997) Robust truss topology design via semidefinite programming. SIAM J Optim 7(4):991–1016

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe M (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe M, Sigmund O (1999) Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arc Appl Mech 69(9–10):635–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe M, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization—theory, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdin B (2001) Filters in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(9):2143–2158

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Canh NN, Stolpe M (2009) A method for solving discrete topology optimization problems with stress constraints. Presented at the 8th world congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization (WCSMO-8)

  • Haber R, Jog C, Bendsøe M (1996) New approach to variable-topology shape design using a constraint on perimeter. Struct Optim 11(1–2):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez J (2005) A note on the theoretical convergence properties of the SIMP method. Struct Multidisc Optim 29:319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietz A (2001) Sufficiency of a finite exponent in SIMP (power law) methods. Struct Multidisc Optim 21:159–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany G, Zhou M, Birker T (1992) Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Struct Optim 4:250–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O (2007) Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 33(4–5):401–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolpe M, Svanberg K (2001) An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 22(2):116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe L, Boyd S (1996) Semidefinite programming. SIAM Rev 38(1):49–95

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wolkowicz H (1981) Some applications of optimization in matrix theory. Linear Algebra Appl 40:101–118

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The presented examples came up after, sometimes lively, discussions about symmetry in the optimal design group at DTU Mathematics. I would like to thank my colleagues Oded Amir, Anders Astrup Larsen, Eduardo Munoz, and Nam Nguyen Canh for interesting discussions on this topic. I would also like to thank Ole Sigmund and two anonymous referees for their feedback on the manuscript which helped improve the presentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathias Stolpe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stolpe, M. On some fundamental properties of structural topology optimization problems. Struct Multidisc Optim 41, 661–670 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0476-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0476-z

Keywords

Navigation