Abstract
The topology description function (TDF) approach is a method for describing geometries in a discrete fashion, i.e. without intermediate densities. Hence, the TDF approach may be used to carry out topology optimization, i.e. to solve the material distribution problem. However, the material distribution problem may be ill-posed. This ill-posedness can be avoided by limiting the complexity of the design, which is accomplished automatically by limiting the number of design parameters used for the TDF. An important feature is that the TDF design description is entirely decoupled from a finite element (FE) model. The basic idea of the TDF approach is as follows. In the TDF approach, the design variables are parameters that determine a function on the so-called reference domain. Using a cut-off level, this function unambiguously determines a geometry. Then, the performance of this geometry is determined by a FE analysis. Several optimization techniques are applied to the TDF approach to carry out topology optimization. First, a genetic algorithm is applied, with (too) large computational costs. The TDF approach is shown to work using a heuristic iterative adaptation of the design parameters. For more effective and sound optimization methods, design sensitivities are required. The first results on design sensitivity analysis are presented, and their accuracy is studied. Numerical examples are provided for illustration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allaire, G.; Kohn, R.V. 1993: Optimal design for minimum weight and compliance in plane stress using extremal microstructures. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 12(6), 839–878
Barthelemy, B.; Chon, C.T.; Haftka, R.T. 1988: Accuracy problems associated with semi-analytical derivatives of static response. Fin. Elem. Anal. Des. 4, 249–265
Barthelemy, B.; Haftka, R.T. 1988: Accuracy analysis of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity calculation. In: Proceedings of the 29th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization
Beckers, M. 1999: Topology optimization using a dual method with discrete variables. Struct. Optim. 17(1), 14–24
Bendsøe, M.; Kikuchi, N. 1988: Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 71(2), 197–224
Bendsøe, M.P. 1989: Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct. Optim. 1, 193–202
Bendsøe, M.P. 1999: Variable-topology optimization: status and challenges. In: Wunderlich, W. (ed.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Computational Mechanics 1999
Bendsøe, M.P.; Sigmund, O. 1999: Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch. Appl. Mech. 69(9), 635–654
Céa, J.; Garreau, S.; Guillaume, P.; Masmoudi, M. 2000: The shape and topological optimizations connection. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 188(4), 713–726
Cheng, G.; Olhoff, N. 1981: An investigation concerning optimal design of solid elastic plates. Int. J. Solid Struct. 17(3), 305–323
De Boer, H.; Van Keulen, F. 2000: Refined semi-analytical design sensitivities. Int. J. Solid Struct. 37(46–47), 6961–6980
De Ruiter, M. J.; Van Keulen, F. 2000: Topology optimization: approaching the material distribution problem using a topological function description. In: Topping, B.H.V. (ed.) Computational Techniques for Materials, Composites and Composite Structures, pp. 111–119. Edinburgh: Civil-Comp Press
Edelsbrunner, H. 1999: Deformable smooth surface design. Disc. Comput. Geom. 21(1), 87–115
Eschenauer, H.A.; Olhoff, N. 2001: Topology optimization of continuum structures: a review. Appl. Mech. Rev. 54(4), 331–390
Eschenauer, H.A.; Kobelev, V.V.; Schumacher, A. 1994: Bubble method for topology and shape optimization of structures. Struct. Optim. 8, 42–51
Garreau, S.; Guillaume, P.; Masmoudi, M. 2001: The topological asymptotic for pde systems: the elasticity case. SIAM J. Control Optim. 39(6), 1756–1778
Gea, H.C. 1996: Topology optimization: a new microstructure-based design domain method. Comput. Struct. 61(5), 781–788
Haber, R.B.; Bendsøe, M.P. 1998: Problem formulation, solution procedures and geometric modeling: key issues in variable-topology optimization. In: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, pp. 1864–1873
Haftka, R.T.; Adelman, H.M. 1989: Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis. Struct. Optim. 1, 137–151
Kohn, R.V.; Strang, G. 1986: Optimal design and relaxation of variational problems. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 39, 1–25 (Part I), 139–182 (Part II) and 353–377 (Part III)
Mlejnek, H.P.; Schirrmacher, R. 1993: An engineer’s approach to optimal material distribution and shape finding. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 106(1), 1–26
Osher, S.; Sethian, J.A. 1988: Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton–Jacobi formulations. J. Comput. Phys. 79(12), 12–49
Petersson, J. 1999: Some convergence results in perimeter controlled topology optimization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 171(1–2), 123–140
Rozvany, G.I.N.; Zhou, M.; Sigmund, O. 1994: Topology optimization in structural design. In: Adeli, H. (ed.) Advances in Design Optimization, pp. 340–399. London: Chapman and Hall
Sethian, J.A.; Wiegmann, A. 2000: Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods. J. Comput. Phys. 163(2), 489–528
Sokolowski, J.; Zochowski, A. 1999: On the topological derivative in shape optimization. SIAM J. Control Optim. 37(4), 1251–1272
Zhou, M.; Rozvany, G.I.N. 1991: The coc algorithm part ii: topological geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 89, 309–336
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Ruiter, M., van Keulen , F. Topology optimization using a topology description function. Struct Multidisc Optim 26, 406–416 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0375-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0375-7