Abstract
Purpose
The optimal management of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients remains a matter of debate, although insights have arisen from recent large trials. Nonetheless, little is known about the current practices and beliefs of intensivists. The goal of this study was to record current practices in RRT management among an international panel of intensivists.
Methods
An online questionnaire that included questions about RRT management in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury was sent to European Society of Intensive Care Medicine members in 2010.
Results
Two hundred and seventy-three intensivists from 50 countries responded. The respondents had an average of 12 (7–20) years of experience in ICUs, and most of them worked in mixed ICUs. Most of the intensivists were responsible for prescribing RRT (92.6 %). Half of the respondents reported using both intermittent haemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy techniques (CRRT), but most preferred using CRRT. The reasons for preferring CRRT were the perception of better haemodynamic stability, better therapeutic effect resulting from cytokine removal and easier fluid balance control. The intensivists used higher RRT doses in septic patients than in non-septic patients (p = 0.03). Finally, we observed an increasing inclination towards the early use of RRT among the intensivists.
Conclusion
CRRT remains the preferred technique for most intensivists in Europe, and a large proportion of the participating intensivists used RRT prescription doses similar to those proposed a decade ago. Our results provide insights into the motivations of intensivists while presenting the technique that may help in selecting control groups for future trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Joannidis M, Forni LG (2011) Clinical review: timing of renal replacement therapy. Crit Care 15:223
RENAL Replacement Therapy Study Investigators, Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L, Finfer S, Gallagher M, Lo S, McArthur C, McGuinness S, Myburgh J, Norton R, Scheinkestel C, Su S (2009) Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 361:1627–1638
VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network, Palevsky PM, Zhang JH, O’Connor TZ, Chertow GM, Crowley ST, Choudhury D, Finkel K, Kellum JA, Paganini E, Schein RM, Smith MW, Swanson KM, Thompson BT, Vijayan A, Watnick S, Star RA, Peduzzi P (2008) Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med 359:7–20
Vinsonneau C, Camus C, Combes A, Costa de Beauregard MA, Klouche K, Boulain T, Pallot JL, Chiche JD, Taupin P, Landais P, Dhainaut JF, Hemodiafe Study Group (2006) Continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration versus intermittent haemodialysis for acute renal failure in patients with multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 368:379–385
Payen D, Mateo J, Cavaillon JM, Fraisse F, Floriot C, Vicaut E (2009) Impact of continuous venovenous hemofiltration on organ failure during the early phase of severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 37:803–810
Ricci Z, Ronco C (2011) Timing, dose and mode of dialysis in acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 17:556–561
Ronco C, Zanella M, Brendolan A, Milan M, Canato G, Zamperetti N, Bellomo R (2001) Management of severe acute renal failure in critically ill patients: an international survey in 345 centres. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:230–237
Ricci Z, Ronco C, D’Amico G, De Felice R, Rossi S, Bolgan I, Bonello M, Zamperetti N, Petras D, Salvatori G, Dan M, Piccinni P (2006) Practice patterns in the management of acute renal failure in the critically ill patient: an international survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:690–696
Ricci Z, Picardo S, Ronco C (2007) Results from international questionnaires. Contrib Nephrol 156:297–303
Ronco C, Ricci Z, Bellomo R (2006) Current worldwide practice of dialysis dose prescription in acute renal failure. Curr Opin Crit Care 12:551–556
Schiffl H, Lang SM, Fischer R (2002) Daily hemodialysis and the outcome of acute renal failure. N Engl J Med 346:305–310
Ronco C, Bellomo R, Homel P, Brendolan A, Dan M, Piccinni P, La Greca G (2000) Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial. Lancet 356:26–30
Saudan P, Niederberger M, De Seigneux S, Romand J, Pugin J, Perneger T, Martin PY (2006) Adding a dialysis dose to continuous hemofiltration increases survival in patients with acute renal failure. Kidney Int 70:1312–1317
Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Doig GS, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz M, Tan I, Bouman C, Macedo E, Gibney N, Tolwani A, Ronco C, Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney (BEST Kidney) Investigators, (2005) Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA 294:813–818
Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz M, Tan I, Bouman C, Macedo E, Gibney N, Tolwani A, Oudemans-van Straaten H, Ronco C, Kellum JA (2007) Continuous renal replacement therapy: a worldwide practice survey. The beginning and ending supportive therapy for the kidney (BEST kidney) investigators. Intensive Care Med 33:1563–1570
Lins RL, Elseviers MM, Van der Niepen P, Hoste E, Malbrain ML, Damas P, Devriendt J, SHARF investigators, (2009) Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury patients admitted to the intensive care unit: results of a randomized clinical trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24:512–518
Schortgen F, Soubrier N, Delclaux C, Thuong M, Girou E, Brun-Buisson C, Lemaire F, Brochard L (2000) Hemodynamic tolerance of intermittent hemodialysis in critically ill patients: usefulness of practice guidelines. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:197–202
Angus DC, Mira J-P, Vincent J-L (2010) Improving clinical trials in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 38:527–532
Bell M, Granath F, Schön S, Ekbom A, Martling C-R (2007) Continuous renal replacement therapy is associated with less chronic renal failure than intermittent haemodialysis after acute renal failure. Intensive Care Med 33:773–780
Cole L, Bellomo R, Hart G, Journois D, Davenport P, Tipping P, Ronco C (2002) A phase II randomized, controlled trial of continuous hemofiltration in sepsis. Crit Care Med 30:100–106
Joannidis M (2009) Continuous renal replacement therapy in sepsis and multisystem organ failure. Semin Dial 2:160–164
Lombel RM, Kommareddi M, Mottes T, Selewski DT, Han YY, Gipson DS, Collins KL, Heung M (2012) Implications of different fluid overload definitions in pediatric stem cell transplant patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. Intensive Care Med 38:663–669
Karvellas CJ, Farhat MR, Sajjad I, Mogensen SS, Leung AA, Wald R, Bagshaw SM (2011) A comparison of early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 15:R72
Csomos A, Varga S, Bertolini G, Hibbert C, Sandor J, Capuzzo M, Guidet BR (2010) Intensive care reimbursement practices: results from the ICUFUND survey. Intensive Care Med 36:1759–1764
Cannesson M, Pestel G, Ricks C, Hoeft A, Perel A (2011) Crit Care Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among north American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care 15:R197
Beloucif S, Payen D (1998) A European survey of the use of inhaled nitric oxide in the ICU. Working group on inhaled NO in the ICU of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 24:864–877
Acknowledgments
This study was endorsed by the European Critical Care Research Network.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
For the European Critical Care Research Network.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Legrand, M., Darmon, M., Joannidis, M. et al. Management of renal replacement therapy in ICU patients: an international survey. Intensive Care Med 39, 101–108 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2706-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2706-x