Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterizing the risk profiles of intensive care units

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To develop a new method to evaluate the performance of individual ICUs through the calculation and visualisation of risk profiles.

Methods

The study included 102,561 patients consecutively admitted to 77 ICUs in Austria. We customized the function which predicts hospital mortality (using SAPS II) for each ICU. We then compared the risks of hospital mortality resulting from this function with the risks which would be obtained using the original function. The derived risk ratio was then plotted together with point-wise confidence intervals in order to visualise the individual risk profile of each ICU over the whole spectrum of expected hospital mortality.

Main measurements and results

We calculated risk profiles for all ICUs in the ASDI data set according to the proposed method. We show examples how the clinical performance of ICUs may depend on the severity of illness of their patients. Both the distribution of the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test statistics and the histogram of the corresponding P values demonstrated a good fit of the individual risk models.

Conclusions

Our risk profile model makes it possible to evaluate ICUs on the basis of the specific risk for patients to die compared to a reference sample over the whole spectrum of hospital mortality. Thus, ICUs at different levels of severity of illness can be directly compared, giving a clear advantage over the use of the conventional single point estimate of the overall observed-to-expected mortality ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano A, Harrell FE Jr (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM (2006) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 34:1297–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moreno RP, Metnitz PG, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, Iapichino G, Edbrooke D, Capuzzo M, Le Gall JR, SAPS 3 Investigators (2005) SAPS 3. From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 31:1345–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Metnitz PG, Moreno RP, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, Iapichino G, Edbrooke D, Capuzzo M, Le Gall JR, SAPS 3 Investigators (2005) SAPS 3. From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: objectives, methods and cohort description. Intensive Care Med 31:1336–1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reis Miranda D, Ryan DW, Schaufeli WB, Fidler V (eds) (1997) Organization and management of intensive care: a prospective study in 12 European countries. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lovegrove J, Valencia O, Treasure T, Sherlaw-Johnson C, Gallivan S (1997) Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display. Lancet 350:1128–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moreno R, Reis Miranda D (1998) Nursing staff in intensive care in Europe. The mismatch between planning and practice. Chest 113:752–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The UK Neonatal Staffing Study Group (2002) Patient volume, staffing, and workload in relation to risk adjusted outcomes in a random stratified sample of UK neonatal intensive care units: a prospective evaluation. Lancet 359:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Metnitz B, Metnitz PG, Bauer P, Valentin A, ASDI Study Group (2009) Patient volume affects outcome in critically ill patients. Wien Klin Wochenschr 121:34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Metnitz PG, Reiter A, Jordan B, Lang T (2004) More interventions do not necessarily improve outcome in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 30:1586–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Connors AF, Speroff T, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell FE Jr, Wagner D, Desbiens N, Goldman L, Wu AW, Califf RM, Fulkerson WJ, Vidaillet H, Broste S, Bellamy P, Lynn J, Knaus WA, The SUPPORT investigators (1996) The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 276:889–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the Austrian Centre for Documentation and Quality Assurance in Intensive Care Medicine (ASDI). Our special thanks to the participants from all the ICUs that participated in the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Bauer.

Additional information

On behalf of the ASDI Study Group.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 4126 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moreno, R.P., Hochrieser, H., Metnitz, B. et al. Characterizing the risk profiles of intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 36, 1207–1212 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-1852-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-1852-2

Keywords

Navigation