Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
In der Akutphase ist es oft schwierig, eine Verletzung der distalen tibiofibularen Syndesmose richtig zu diagnostizieren. Wird die Diagnose verpasst, entsteht eine Inkongruenz im oberen Sprunggelenk mit pathologischer Außenrotation des Talus. Das Risiko einer möglichen vorzeitigen Arthrose ist dadurch deutlich erhöht.
Fallvorstellung
In unserem dargestellten Fall wurde bei einer jungen Patientin eine distale Syndesmosenruptur verspätet diagnostiziert.
Material und Methode
Selektive Literaturrecherche sowie Darstellung des eigenen Falls.
Ergebnisse
Die verkürzte Fibula sowie die chronische Instabilität der tibiofibularen Syndesmose wurden mit einer Verlängerungs-/Derotationsosteotomie und einer Rekonstruktion mit der Grazilissehne korrigiert. Hierdurch ließen sich die anatomischen Verhältnisse exakt rekonstruieren.
Schlussfolgerungen
Das posttraumatische Malalignment im Bereich des oberen Sprunggelenks ist mit einem hohen Risiko für sekundär degenerative Veränderungen verbunden. Im Verdachtsfall muss daher die Diagnose erzwungen werden, denn der anatomischen Reposition und Rekonstruktion der Stabilität wird große Bedeutung zugemessen.
Abstract
Background
It is often difficult in the acute phase to diagnose a lesion of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. If this lesion is overlooked, the patient will develop an incongruity of the upper ankle joint with a pathological external rotation of the talus. The risk of a possible premature arthritis is clearly increased.
Objectives
In this case study a distal rupture of the syndesmosis in a young patient was overlooked in the initial diagnostic work-up.
Methods
A search of the relevant literature and a case report.
Results
In the case described the shortened fibula and chronic instability of the tibiofibular syndesmosis were repaired with a lengthening and derotational osteotomy and reconstruction using the gracilis muscle tendon. Through this method an exact reconstruction of the normal anatomy could be achieved.
Conclusion
Posttraumatic misalignment in the ankle joint is associated with a high risk of secondary degenerative lesions. In cases with suspicion of a syndesmosis lesion, confirmation of the diagnosis is imperative so as to perform an anatomic repositioning and reconstruction of stability.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00132-014-2268-4/MediaObjects/132_2014_2268_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00132-014-2268-4/MediaObjects/132_2014_2268_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00132-014-2268-4/MediaObjects/132_2014_2268_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00132-014-2268-4/MediaObjects/132_2014_2268_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00132-014-2268-4/MediaObjects/132_2014_2268_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00132-014-2268-4/MediaObjects/132_2014_2268_Fig6_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00132-014-2268-4/MediaObjects/132_2014_2268_Fig7_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00132-014-2268-4/MediaObjects/132_2014_2268_Fig8_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00132-014-2268-4/MediaObjects/132_2014_2268_Fig9_HTML.jpg)
Literatur
Bach FD, Carlier RY, Elis JB et al (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid interference screws: MR imaging follow-up. Radiology 225:541–550
Bartonícek J (2003) Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat 25:379–386
Beals TC, Manoli (1998) Late syndesmosis reconstruction: a case report. Foot Ankle Int 19:485–488
Beumer A, Heijboer RP, Fontijne WP, Swierstra BA (2000) Late reconstruction of the anterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Acta Orthop Scand 71:519–521
Beumer A, Swierstra BA, Mulder PG (2002) Clinical diagnosis of syndesmotic ankle instability: evaluation of stress tests behind the curtains. Acta Orthop Scand 73:667–669
Buckley R (2005) Tricortical screws were as effective as quadricortical screws in ankle fractures at 1 year. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87:465
Close JR (1956) Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 38-A:761–781
Espinosa N, Smerek JP, Myerson MS (2006) Acute and chronic syndesmosis injuries: pathomechanisms, diagnosis and management. Foot Ankle Clin 11:639–657
Fallat L, Grimm DJ, Saracco JA (1998) Sprained ankle syndrome: prevalence and analysis of 639 acute injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg 37:280–285
Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM et al (2006) Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 27:788–792
Grass R, Rammelt S, Biewener A, Zwipp H (2003) Peroneus longus ligamentoplasty for chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 24:392–397
Han SH, Lee JW, Kim S et al (2007) Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int 28:336–342
Harper MC (2001) Delayed reduction and stabilization of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 22:15–18
Hoefnagels EM, Waites MD, Wing ID et al (2007) Biomechanical comparison of the interosseous tibiofibular ligament and the anterior tibiofibular ligament. Foot Ankle Int 28:602–604
Jansson KA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J et al (1999) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique. A clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:290–295
Lin CF, Gross ML, Weinhold P (2006) Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:372–384
Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Bylund C, Selvik G (1989) Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex – part 3: influence of leg rotation. Foot Ankle 9:304–309
Michelson D (1995) Fractures about the ankel. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77:142–152
Morris MW, Rice P, Schneider TE (2009) Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis reconstruction using a free hamstring autograft. Foot Ankle Int 30:506–511
Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SC (1994) Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: diagnosis and treatment by arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 10:561–568
Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Gilbart MK, Chorney K (1997) Chronic pain following ankle sprains in athletes: the role of arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 13:564–574
Ovaska MT, Mäkinen TJ, Madanat R et al (2013) A comprehensive analysis of patients with malreduced ankle fractures undergoing re-operation. Int Orthop 38:83–88
Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Grass R (2008) Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: an evidence-based approach to acute and chronic lesions. Foot Ankle Clin 13:611–633
Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 58:356–357
Ruan Z, Luo C, Shi Z et al (2011) Intraoperative reduction of distal tibiofibular joint aided by three-dimensional fluoroscopy. Technol Health Care 19:161–166
Rose JD, Flanigan KP, Mlodzienski A (2002) Tibiofibular diastasis without ankle fracture: a review and report of two cases. J Foot Ankle Surg 41:44–51
Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Stähelin AC et al (2000) Biodegradable implants in sports medicine: the biological base. Arthroscopy 16:305–321
Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien
Interessenkonflikt. C. Michelitsch, Y.P. Acklin, K. Stoffel, H. Bereiter geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Michelitsch, C., Acklin, Y., Stoffel, K. et al. Chronische obere Sprunggelenkinstabilität. Orthopäde 43, 379–385 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-014-2268-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-014-2268-4