Abstract
Background
There is limited research concerning residential mobility among people with severe mental illness.
Aim
To investigate residential mobility over 2 years among participants in the UK700 trial of intensive case management in severe mental illness.
Methods
Cohort study.
Results
Over 60% of participants had recently wanted to move or improve their accommodation but this was not associated with mobility. Mobility was strongly associated with younger age and drug and alcohol misuse and weakly associated with being unmarried and needs relating to a benefit claim. Among those likely to have been living in supported housing, mobility was also associated with being able to look after the home. Among those living independently, mobility was also associated with being an inpatient at randomisation.
Discussion
Wanting to move did not predict mobility. This contrasts with findings in the general population. Several of the associations found are possibly due to forced mobility. The association with younger age is likely to represent voluntary mobility as in the general population.
Conclusions
Future studies of residential mobility in severe mental illness should make use of a wider range of methods and should draw on the general population literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee S, Wong Y-LI, Rothbard AB (2009) Factors associated with departure from supported independent living programs for persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 60:367–373
Social Exclusion Unit (2004) Mental health and social exclusion: social exclusion unit report. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
Meltzer H, Singleton N, Lee A, Bebbington P, Brugha T, Jenkins R (2002) The social and economic circumstances of adults with mental disorders. Office for National Statistics, London
Social Exclusion Unit (2004) Mental health and housing: factsheet 6. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
Kyle T, Dunn JR (2008) Effects of housing circumstances on health, quality of life and healthcare use for people with severe mental illness: a review. Health Soc Care Community 16:1–15
Tulloch AD, Fearon P, David AS (2008) The determinants and outcomes of long-stay psychiatric admissions—a case-control study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 43:569–574
Appleby L, Desai P (1987) Residential instability: a perspective on system imbalance. Am J Orthopsychiatry 57:515–524
Lamont A, Ukoumunne OC, Tyrer P, Thornicroft G, Patel R, Slaughter J (2000) The geographical mobility of severely mentally ill residents in London. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 35:164–169
Caton CL, Goldstein J (1984) Housing change of chronic schizophrenic patients: a consequence of the revolving door. Soc Sci Med 19:759–764
Dembling BP, Rovnyak V, Mackey S, Blank M (2002) Effect of geographic migration on SMI prevalence estimates. Ment Health Serv Res 4:7–12
DeVerteuil G, Hinds A, Lix L, Walker J, Robinson R, Roos LL (2007) Mental health and the city: intra-urban mobility among individuals with schizophrenia. Health Place 13:310–323
Lix LM, DeVerteuil G, Walker JR, Robinson JR, Hinds AM, Roos LL (2007) Residential mobility of individuals with diagnosed schizophrenia—a comparison of single and multiple movers. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:221–228
Lix LM, Hinds A, DeVerteuil G, Robinson JR, Walker J, Roos LL (2006) Residential mobility and severe mental illness: a population-based analysis. Adm Policy Ment Health 33:160–171
McCarthy JF, Valenstein M, Blow FC (2007) Residential mobility among patients in the VA health system: associations with psychiatric morbidity, geographic accessibility, and continuity of care. Adm Policy Ment Health 34:448–455
Clark WAV, Onaka JL (1983) Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility. Urban Stud 20:47–57
Cadwallader M (1992) Migration and residential mobility: macro and micro approaches. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Sell RR (1983) Analyzing migration decisions: the first step—whose decisions? Demography 20:299–311
Speare A (1974) Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography 11:173–188
Lu M (1999) Do people move when they say they will? Inconsistencies in individual migration behavior. Popul Environ 20:467–488
DeVerteuil G (2003) Homeless mobility, institutional settings, and the new poverty management. Environ Plan A 35:361–379
Rahimian A, Wolch JR, Koegel P (1992) A model of homeless migration: homeless men in Skid Row, Los Angeles. Environ Plan A 24(1):317–336
Burns T, Creed F, Fahy T, Thompson S, Tyrer P, White I, Grp UK (1999) Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: a randomised trial. Lancet 353:2185–2189
Walsh E, Leese M, Taylor PJ, Johnston I, Burns T, Creed F, Higgitt A, Murray R (2002) Psychosis in high-security and general psychiatric services—report from the UK700 and special hospitals’ treatment resistant schizophrenia groups. Br J Psychiatry 180:351–357
Walsh E, Hawey K, White I, Manley C, Fraser J, Stanbridge S, Murray RM, for the UK700 group (1999) Prevalence and predictors of parasuicide in chronic psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 100:375–382
Susser M (1991) What is a cause and how do we know one? A grammar for pragmatic epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 133:635–648
Oliver J, Huxley P, Bridges K, Mohamad K (1996) Quality of life and mental health services. Routledge, London
Slade M, Phelan M, Thornicroft G, Parkman S (1996) The Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN): comparison of assessments by staff and patients of the needs of the severely mentally ill. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 31:109–113
Susser E, Finnerty M, Mojtabai R, Yale S, Conover S, Goetz R, Amador X (2000) Reliability of the Life Chart Schedule for assessment of the long-term course of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 42:67–77
McGuffin P, Farmer A, Harvey I (1991) A polydiagnostic application of operational criteria in studies of psychotic illness. Development and reliability of the OPCRIT system. Arch Gen Psychiatry 48:764–770
Griffin J (2005) INTCENS: Stata module to perform interval-censored survival analysis. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s453501.html. Accessed 28 May 2009
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55
Acknowledgments
The UK700 group was headed by Professor Tom Burns (St George’s Hospital), Professor Francis Creed (Manchester), Professor Tom Fahy (Maudsley and Kings College Hospitals) and Professor Peter Tyrer (St Mary’s Hospital). We are grateful to Dr. Elizabeth Walsh (Kings College London, Institute of Psychiatry) for practical assistance in providing various parts of the dataset. The paper is derived from a project performed at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine as part of an MSc in Public Health: Health Service Research under the supervision of Professor Nick Black. Dr. Tulloch is supported by an MRC Special Research Training Fellowship in Health Services Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tulloch, A.D., Fearon, P., Fahy, T. et al. Residential mobility among individuals with severe mental illness: cohort study of UK700 participants. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 45, 767–777 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0115-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0115-4