Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often considered the standard for defining the practice of evidence-based medicine. Taken alone, they are, however, often insufficient to guide clinical care. Randomized controlled trials are clearly the best method to determine whether interventions are efficacious. They have, however, numerous limitations which make them difficult to carry out or limit applicability to routine clinical practice. Although observational studies also have inherent limitations, they provide data which can help to further explain the results of randomized controlled trials. The use of observational studies to frame randomized trials can allow better application of randomized controlled trial results to individual patients and can thus help to optimize delivery of care, inform clinical practice and determine the need for further such trials.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vijan, S., Kent, D. & Hayward, R. Are randomized controlled trials sufficient evidence to guide clinical practice in Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus?. Diabetologia 43, 125–130 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250050017
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250050017