Introduction

Plasma triglyceride levels have been recognised as an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease [1, 2]. Genetic variations in the apolipoprotein (APO) gene cluster APOA1-C3-A4, located on chromosome 11, are associated with plasma triglyceride concentrations [3]. APOA1, the major structural protein of HDL-cholesterol plays a key role in reverse cholesterol transport [4]. APOC3 is a critical factor in VLDL-triglyceride metabolism [5]. The physiological role of APOA4 is still largely unknown, except for its postulated function as a satiety factor or as a co-factor for intestinal fat absorption [6]. Recently, the APOA5 gene has been identified, and is located adjacent to the APOA1-C3-A4 gene cluster [7]. The APOA5 gene displays close homology with the APOA4 gene and shows high sequence homology between man, mouse, rat and chicken [8]. Mice that are deficient in APOA5 exhibit markedly elevated plasma triglyceride levels [7, 9], but in contrast, mice overexpressing the human APOA5 gene have decreased plasma triglyceride levels as a function of the level of APOA5 expression [7, 10, 11]. Based on these studies in mice, an opposing role for APOA5 and APOC3 in triglyceride metabolism has been proposed. Human studies have focused upon the association between genetic variation in the APOA5 gene and plasma triglyceride levels. Two common APOA5 polymorphisms, the −1131T→C polymorphism and the c56C→G (S19W) polymorphism in the APOA5 signal peptide, are of particular interest [12, 13]. The rare alleles of each polymorphism both show a positive association with elevated plasma triglyceride levels in clinical studies as well as in the general population.

Based on the data from human and animal studies, we hypothesised that the following would apply in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: (1) plasma APOA5 concentration will be negatively associated with plasma triglyceride levels; (2) genetic variations in the APOA5 gene determine plasma APOA5 levels; and (3) the major reductions of APOB-containing triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, APOE and APOC3 that are achieved by atorvastatin treatment may coincide with an increase in plasma APOA5 concentrations.

In the present study, we tested these hypotheses by determining plasma APOA5, APOC3, APOE and triglyceride levels, and assessing genetic variation in the APOA1-C3-A4-A5 gene cluster in patients with type 2 diabetes in the Diabetes Atorvastatin Lipid-lowering Intervention (DALI) study; this is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial comparing the effects of atorvastatin at a dose of 10 mg daily or 80 mg daily on plasma lipids and apolipoproteins in patients with type 2 diabetes, selected for the presence of hypertriglyceridaemia [14]. We have shown that statin treatment leads to a marked decrease in plasma APOC3 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes [15].

Subjects, materials and methods

Study protocol

The present study comprised 215 patients enrolled in the DALI study. DALI was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study, evaluating the effect of atorvastatin 10 vs 80 mg daily on lipid metabolism, endothelial function, coagulation and inflammatory factors in unrelated men and women with type 2 diabetes selected for the presence of mild hypertriglyceridaemia. The protocol and eligibility criteria have been described in detail elsewhere [14]. Briefly, men and women aged 45–75 years, with diabetes of at least 1 year duration and an HbA1c equal to or below 10% were eligible. The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes was defined according to the American Diabetes Association classification, published in 2000 [16]. Lipid inclusion criteria were: total cholesterol between 4.0 and 8.0 mmol/l and fasting triglycerides between 1.5 and 6.0 mmol/l. Patients were excluded when they had a history of myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft or clinical symptoms of manifest coronary artery disease. When applicable, lipid-lowering drugs were withdrawn at least 8 weeks before the start of the run-in phase. Patients were recruited in Leiden, Rotterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands. The ethical committees of the participating centres approved the study protocol and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

After an overnight fast for a minimum of 12 h, blood was drawn into EDTA-containing tubes for analysis of lipid profiles at baseline and after treatment for 30 weeks. Plasma was prepared by immediate centrifugation (1,800 g, 15 min, 4°C), and samples were stored at −80°C until further analyses. Cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, APOA1 and APOB were measured as described previously [14]. Plasma APOE was analysed automatically with a nephelometric assay (Wako, Osaka, Japan). Plasma APOC3 was analysed with a commercially available electroimmunoassay (Hydragel LP CIII, Sebia, Issey-les-Moulineaux, France). Fasting plasma glucose was determined on a Hitachi 917 analyser using an UV-hexokinase method (Cat. No. 18766899, Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). HbA1c was determined by HPLC, using the BIO-RAD Variant TM method (Cat. No. 270-0003, Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA). Plasma APOA5 concentration was measured using a recently developed sandwich ELISA as described [17]. The monoclonal antibody B10E was used for capture and biotinylated monoclonal antibody E8E was used for detection. For calibration of the ELISA, purified bacterial rh-APOA5 was used as primary calibrator. The day-to-day variation and between-plate and within-day variations in the ELISA were 5.5 and 2.2%, respectively.

Polymorphisms in the APOC3 and APOA1 genes were assessed as described elsewhere [18]. The APOA5 c56C→G (S19W) polymorphism was determined essentially as described, using an identical set of forward and reverse primers [13]. The PCR conditions were: initial denaturing at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 58°C/30 s at 72°C and a final extension of 7 min at 72°C. The restriction enzyme Taq1 was used to define the alleles. The −1131T→C polymorphism was analysed as described previously [13]. The PCR conditions were: initial denaturing at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 95°C/1 min at 58°C/1 min at 72°C and a final extension of 7 min at 72°C. Tru1I was used to define the alleles.

Statistical analyses

The statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS software (version 12). All data are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD). Mean differences between the groups were analysed using analysis of variance. Deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were assessed using a χ 2 test. To analyse the determinants of plasma triglycerides we used the following strategy. The raw data were presented as plotted correlations between apolipoproteins and triglycerides with Spearman correlation coefficients. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed with triglyceride as the dependent outcome variable; adjustment was made for sex and age, HDL-cholesterol and APOE levels. The contribution of plasma APOA5 and APOC3 to triglyceride levels was estimated simultaneously by entering them together with all co-variables concomitantly into the analysis. In addition, we calculated the partial explained variance (partial r 2) as the difference between the r 2 of the model with all the co-variables and the r 2 of repeated analyses after removing a specific variable from the model. We also used a stepwise linear regression model to test for the presence of significant determinants in our database, but this did not yield additional contributors. The placebo-controlled effect of treatment on lipid and apolipoprotein variables was analysed with two-way analysis of covariance, using a placebo-controlled setting. In addition, we used a matched multiple linear regression model to estimate the effects of treatment. Throughout, a two-tailed p value <0.05 was interpreted as indicating a statistically significant difference.

Results

Selected baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1, but have also been published in more detail elsewhere [14]. The patients had elevated plasma triglycerides (2.8±1.0 mmol/l) and decreased plasma HDL-cholesterol (1.04±0.24 mmol/l). Mean plasma LDL-cholesterol was 3.7±0.9 mmol/l. Mean fasting plasma glucose level was 10.6 mmol/l and HbA1c was 8.7%. Baseline plasma APOA5 level varied from 7.0 to 139.8 μg/100 ml, with a mean of 25.7±15.6 μg/100 ml. APOC3 levels ranged from 22 to 68 mg/100 ml (mean: 41.4±9.9 mg/100 ml), and APOE ranged from 2.5 to 8.7 mg/100 ml (mean 4.5±1.0 mg/100 ml) (Table 2). There were no differences between the three treatment groups. The unadjusted correlation between plasma triglycerides and APOA5 (R s=0.399, p<0.001) is shown in Fig. 1. The correlation between plasma triglycerides and plasma APOC3 was 0.721 (p<0.001), and that between plasma triglycerides and plasma APOE was 0.449 (p<0.001). At baseline, the co-variables (Table 3) explained 76% of the variance in plasma triglycerides (r 2=0.756, p<0.001). Plasma APOC3 was the strongest contributor to the variation in plasma triglyceride levels (r 2=0.520, p<0.001), whereas HDL-cholesterol was the only lipid parameter showing a significant contribution (r 2=0.155, p<0.001). In contrast, APOA5 and APOE only contributed to a small extent. The relative importance of each parameter in the variation in plasma triglycerides was illustrated by calculating the change in plasma triglyceride upon a 10% change in the individual determinant (Table 4). A 10% change in plasma APOC3 levels (4.2 mg/100 ml) was associated with a change in plasma triglycerides of 0.26 mmol/l. In contrast, a change of 10% in plasma APOA5 levels was associated with a change in plasma triglycerides of only 0.025 mmol/l.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study cohort
Table 2 Effect of 30 weeks atorvastatin treatment on plasma apolipoproteins and plasma triglyceride levels
Fig. 1
figure 1

Unadjusted correlation between APOA5 and plasma triglycerides. The Spearman correlation coefficient was R s=0.399, p<0.001

Table 3 Effect of baseline determinants on plasma triglyceride variation determined by multivariate linear regression analyses
Table 4 Change of plasma triglyceride levels induced by a 10% increase of APOC3, APOA5, APOE and HDL-cholesterol at baseline

In the present study, the c56C→G and −1131T→C variants in the APOA5 gene, the 3238C→G polymorphism in the APOC3 gene and the −78G→A polymorphism in the APOA1 gene promoter were analysed. Effects of these genotypes on plasma APOA5 levels are presented in Fig. 2. The effects of the APOA5 gene variants on plasma triglyceride concentrations at baseline are presented in Table 5. All polymorphisms were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (χ 2<0.178, df=1, p>0.6). The heterozygous carriers of the APOA5:c56G variant and the heterozygous carriers of the APOA1:−78G variant had increased levels of plasma APOA5 (p<0.01). In contrast, the heterozygous carriers of the APOC3 gene variant and the −1131T→C polymorphism in the APOA5 gene were associated with lower plasma APOA5 levels (p<0.05). No significant associations with plasma triglycerides were observed.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of genetic variations in the APOA5 gene (c56C→G, −1131T→C), the APOA1 gene (−78G→A), and the APOC3 gene (3238G→C) on plasma APOA5 concentration. *p<0.001 12/22 vs 11 genotype as measured with unpaired t test statistics

Table 5 Effect of genetic variation in the APOA5 gene on plasma triglycerides before and during atorvastatin treatment

We have previously reported that atorvastatin significantly decreased plasma total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, as well as triglycerides, in type 2 diabetic subjects in the DALI study [14]. In addition, atorvastatin treatment, 10 or 80 mg daily, resulted in a dose-dependent decrease of plasma APOC3 (21 and 27%, respectively, p<0.001) [15] and APOE (28 and 36%, respectively; p<0.001, Table 2). Atorvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg reduced plasma APOA5 by 15 and 35%, respectively (p<0.001; 10 vs 80 mg p<0.001). In a matched multiple linear regression model, we estimated the placebo-controlled contributions of APOA5, APOC3, APOE, APOB and HDL-cholesterol to variations in the decrease in triglyceride level during atorvastatin treatment. The decrease in APOC3 explained 59% of the variance of triglyceride reduction (r 2=0.588, p<0.001). The contributions of the decreases in APOA5 (r 2=0.015) and APOB (r 2=0.005) were negligible, whereas the contributions of the decrease in APOE (r 2=0.098) and the increase in HDL-cholesterol (r 2=0.045) were minor. Therefore, despite the relatively large decrease in APOC3 concentrations, it remained the most powerful determinant of plasma triglyceride levels, whereas again the contribution of APOA5 levels was negligible. No effect of genetic variation in the APOA5 gene on the response to atorvastatin treatment of plasma triglycerides could be demonstrated (Table 5).

Discussion

The main results obtained in the present study in patients with type 2 diabetes are: (1) plasma APOA5 concentrations are positively associated with plasma triglyceride levels; (2) atorvastatin treatment resulted not only in a decrease in plasma triglycerides, but also in a decrease in plasma APOA5 levels; and (3) APOC3 is a much stronger determinant of plasma triglyceride levels than is APOA5, thereby supporting the notion that plasma APOA5 only plays a minor role in the triglyceride metabolism of patients with type 2 diabetes. Accordingly, several of our original hypotheses, which had been derived from earlier human and animal studies, were disproved, suggesting that the role of APOA5 in triglyceride metabolism may be different in mice and men.

The recent development of specific immunoassays for human APOA5 enables in-depth investigation of the role of APOA5 in human lipoprotein metabolism. APOA5 in human plasma is present on VLDL and HDL particles [19]. However, its total plasma concentration is very low and only about 4% of VLDL particles carry an APOA5 molecule [20, 21]. In contrast, all VLDL particles are carrying one or more APOC3 molecules. Average plasma APOA5 levels have been reported in healthy normolipidaemic volunteers of Caucasian origin as 16 μg/100 ml [19] and 1 μg/100 ml [22], and in healthy Japanese subjects as 18 μg/100 ml [17]. In our patients with type 2 diabetes, who were of Caucasian origin and had moderately elevated plasma triglyceride levels, plasma APOA5 levels were 7 to 139 μg/100 ml.

APOA5 has been extensively studied in models of genetically engineered mice. However, the exact molecular mechanism underlying the role of APOA5 in triglyceride metabolism remains unclear. The fractional catabolic rate of VLDL and chylomicron triglycerides was markedly accelerated in both human APOA5 transgenic mice and adenovirus-mediated APOA5-overexpressing mice, and was sharply decreased in APOA5-deficient mice, clearly suggesting a role for APOA5 in the hydrolysis of triglycerides [9, 10, 21, 23]. All these studies, however, were complicated by the fact that APOC3, a well-known inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase activity, is decreased in APOA5 transgenic mouse models and increased in APOA5-deficient mice [7]. Using a different strategy it was suggested that APOA5 may accelerate the hydrolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by facilitating their interaction with proteoglycan-bound lipoprotein lipase [21]. However, recently human APOA5 concentration was shown not to be related to VLDL kinetic parameters in 15 healthy control subjects [24]. Moreover, in a postprandial study in patients with type 2 diabetes a lack of correlation between plasma APOA5 levels and an index for lipoprotein lipase activity was found [22]. This was confirmed in the present study where no relationship between plasma APOA5 levels and plasma post-heparin lipoprotein lipase activity could be found (data not shown). These results do not favour a role of human APOA5 in lipoprotein lipase-mediated lipolysis. In conclusion, APOA5 appears to be implicated in triglyceride metabolism in mice by showing a negative association with plasma triglycerides. However, its role in human triglyceride metabolism is largely unknown and may be different, as illustrated by the positive correlation between plasma APOA5 concentration and plasma triglycerides observed in the present study. We compared the relationship between APOA5 and triglycerides with that of two well-known modifiers of triglycerides, namely APOC3 and APOE. In multivariate analyses, APOC3 was found to be the major independent determinant of plasma triglyceride levels. APOA5, as well as APOE, exerts only minor influence on plasma triglyceride variation.

A number of association studies have been performed. Two common haplotypes were defined: APOA5*2 based on −1131C→T and APOA5*3 based on the c56C→G polymorphism [8]. Association studies have shown a positive correlation between plasma triglycerides and the rare variant of the c56C→G, as well as the rare variant of the −1131T→C in a number of different populations, patient cohorts, and ethnic groups [7, 12, 13, 2532]. In the present study, the associations between these genetic variations and plasma triglycerides did not reach statistical significance. In addition, the genetic variations in the APOA5 gene did not affect the triglyceride response during statin treatment. However, genetic variations in the APOA1-C3-A4-A5 gene cluster were clearly associated with differences in plasma APOA5 levels (Fig. 2). Variations in the APOC3 gene (3238G→C) and the APOA5-1131C>T polymorphism are associated with decreased plasma APOA5 levels whereas other variations in the APOA1 (−78G→A) and APOA5 (c56C→G) genes are associated with elevated plasma APOA5 concentrations. The present study was too small to perform meaningful haplotype analyses, but it has been suggested that the minor allele of the APOA1 promoter polymorphism is on the same haplotype as the minor allele of c56C→G, which could provide an explanation for the observed relationship [30]. The S19W (c56C→G) polymorphism located in the signal peptide is predicted to have an effect on APOA5 gene transcription [33], whereas results from in vitro expression studies suggested that the −1131T→C may not be a functional polymorphism [33]. However, we do find a significant association with plasma APOA5 levels, although in the opposite direction to the c56C→G polymorphism. It is evident that larger association studies are required to fully understand the effect of genetic variation in the APOA1-C3-A4-A5 gene cluster on plasma APOA5 levels. We cannot rule out the possibility that the frequently observed associations between APOA5 gene polymorphisms and plasma triglycerides may not involve the APOA5 protein. The APOA5 gene may be in strong linkage disequilibrium with an as yet unknown gene which is strongly related to plasma triglycerides. This will not be APOC3, because genetic variation in the APOC3 gene does not explain the observed relationship between APOC3 and triglycerides.

A weakness of our study is that we restricted our analyses to patients with type 2 diabetes and therefore we cannot test the general validity of our findings. The strength of our study is that we were able to analyse the placebo-controlled effect of two dosages of atorvastatin. This experiment facilitated analyses in the same individual with a difference in lipid and apolipoprotein levels. Atorvastatin treatment resulted in a decrease of plasma triglycerides, APOA5, APOC3, APOE and APOB, as well as of VLDL- and LDL-cholesterol. In multivariate analyses, the decrease in APOC3 correlated strongly with the decrease in triglycerides whereas the contributions of APOA5 and APOE were almost negligible. Hence, in patients with type 2 diabetes, APOA5 had made a substantial contribution to neither the baseline triglyceride levels, nor the effect of atorvastatin treatment on triglyceride levels when APOC3 levels were decreased. Whether atorvastatin can directly affect APOA5 gene expression remains to be established. It has been shown that fibrates inhibit APOA5 mRNA, indicating the presence of a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) response element in the gene promoter [34], and it has been shown that atorvastatin has PPAR-α-inhibiting potential [35].

In conclusion, our study shows that APOA5, present in human plasma in a low concentration compared with APOC3, plays a relatively modest role as a regulator of triglyceride homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, it cannot be ruled out that APOA5 acts locally in the liver, its tissue site of origin, via as yet unknown mechanisms.