Abstract
A major focus of sugarcane variety improvement programs is to increase sugar yield, which can be accomplished by either increasing the sugar content of the cane or by increasing cane yield, as the correlation between these traits is low. We used a cross between an Australian sugarcane variety Q165, and a Saccharum officinarum accession, IJ76-514, to dissect the inheritance of yield-related traits in the complex polyploid sugarcane. A population of 227 individuals was grown in a replicated field trial and evaluated over 3 years for stalk weight, stalk diameter, stalk number, stalk length and total biomass. Over 1,000 AFLP and SSR markers were scored across the population and used to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL). In total, 27 regions were found that were significant at the 5% threshold using permutation tests with at least one trait; individually, they explained from 4 to 10% of the phenotypic variation and up to 46% were consistent across years. With the inclusion of digeneic interactions, from 28 to 60% of the variation was explained for these traits. The 27 genomic regions were located on 22 linkage groups (LGs) in six of the eight homology groups (HGs) indicating that a number of alleles or quantitative trait alleles (QTA) at each QTL contribute to the trait; from one to three alleles had an effect on the traits for each QTL identified. Alleles of a candidate gene, TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1 (TB1), the major gene controlling branching in maize, were mapped in this population using either an SSR or SNP markers. Two alleles showed some association with stalk number, but unlike maize, TB1 is not a major gene controlling branching in sugarcane but only has a minor and variable effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken KS, Jackson PA, McIntyre CL (2005) A combination of AFLP and SSR markers provides extensive map coverage and identification of homo(eo)logous linkage groups in a sugarcane cultivar. Theor Appl Genet 110:789–801
Aitken KS, Jackson PA, McIntyre CL (2006) Quantitative trait loci identified for sugar related traits in a sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivar × Saccharum officinarum population. Theor Appl Genet 112:1306–1317
Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963–971
Daniels J, Roach BT (1987) Taxonomy and evolution. In: Heinz DJ (ed) Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, pp 7–84
D’Hont A, Grivet L, Feldmann P, Rao S, Berding N, Glaszmann J-C (1996) Characterisation of the double genome structure of modern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp.) by molecular cytogenetics. Mol Gen Genet 250:405–413
Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C (1995) teosinte branched 1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141:333–346
Doust AN, Devos KM, Gadberry MD, Gale MD, Kellog EA (2004) Genetic control of branching in foxtail millet. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9045–9050
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group, Harlow
Hubbard L, McSteen P, Doebley J, Hake S (2002) Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched 1 correlate with growth suppression in Maize and Teosinte. Genetics 162:1927–1935
Hoarau J-Y, Grivet L, Offmann B, Raboin L-M, Diorflat J-P, Payet J, Hellmann M, D’Hont A, Glaszmann J-C (2002) Genetic dissection of a modern sugarcane cultivar (Saccharum spp.). II. Detection of QTLs for yield components. Theor Appl Genet 105:1027–1037
Jackson PA (2005) Breeding for improved sugar content in sugarcane. Field Crops Res 92:277–290
Lander E, Kruglyak L (1995) Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 11:241–247
McIntyre CL, Jackson M, Cordeiro GM, Amouyal O, Hermann S, Aitken KS, Eliott F, Henry RJ, Casu RE, Bonnett GD (2006) The identification and characterisation of alleles of sucrose phosphate synthase gene family III in sugarcane. Mol Breed 18:39–50
Milligan SB, Gravois KA, Bischoff KP, Martin FA (1990) Crop effects on genetic relationships among sugarcane traits. Crop Sci 30:927–931
Ming R, Liu S-C, Moore PH, Irvine JE, Paterson AH (2001) QTL analysis in a complex autopolyploid: genetic control of sugar content in sugarcane. Genome Res 11:2075–2084
Ming R, Wang Y-W, Draye X, Moore PH, Irvine JE, Paterson AH (2002) Molecular dissection of complex traits in autopolyploids: mapping QTLs affecting sugar yield and related traits in sugarcane. Theor Appl Genet 105:332–345
Roach BT (1984) Conservation and use of the genetic resources of sugarcane. Sugarcane 2:7–11
Sreenivasan TV, Ahloowalia BS, Heinz DJ (1987) Cytogenetics. In: Heinz DJ (ed) Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, pp 211–253
Acknowledgments
Many people helped collect the phenotypic data including the field staff from CSR, Michael Hewitt, John Foreman (CSIRO) and Graeme Holzberger (BSES Limited). This work was in part funded by SRDC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by F. van Eeuwijk.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aitken, K.S., Hermann, S., Karno, K. et al. Genetic control of yield related stalk traits in sugarcane. Theor Appl Genet 117, 1191–1203 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0856-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0856-6