Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic control of yield related stalk traits in sugarcane

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major focus of sugarcane variety improvement programs is to increase sugar yield, which can be accomplished by either increasing the sugar content of the cane or by increasing cane yield, as the correlation between these traits is low. We used a cross between an Australian sugarcane variety Q165, and a Saccharum officinarum accession, IJ76-514, to dissect the inheritance of yield-related traits in the complex polyploid sugarcane. A population of 227 individuals was grown in a replicated field trial and evaluated over 3 years for stalk weight, stalk diameter, stalk number, stalk length and total biomass. Over 1,000 AFLP and SSR markers were scored across the population and used to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL). In total, 27 regions were found that were significant at the 5% threshold using permutation tests with at least one trait; individually, they explained from 4 to 10% of the phenotypic variation and up to 46% were consistent across years. With the inclusion of digeneic interactions, from 28 to 60% of the variation was explained for these traits. The 27 genomic regions were located on 22 linkage groups (LGs) in six of the eight homology groups (HGs) indicating that a number of alleles or quantitative trait alleles (QTA) at each QTL contribute to the trait; from one to three alleles had an effect on the traits for each QTL identified. Alleles of a candidate gene, TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1 (TB1), the major gene controlling branching in maize, were mapped in this population using either an SSR or SNP markers. Two alleles showed some association with stalk number, but unlike maize, TB1 is not a major gene controlling branching in sugarcane but only has a minor and variable effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken KS, Jackson PA, McIntyre CL (2005) A combination of AFLP and SSR markers provides extensive map coverage and identification of homo(eo)logous linkage groups in a sugarcane cultivar. Theor Appl Genet 110:789–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken KS, Jackson PA, McIntyre CL (2006) Quantitative trait loci identified for sugar related traits in a sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivar × Saccharum officinarum population. Theor Appl Genet 112:1306–1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963–971

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels J, Roach BT (1987) Taxonomy and evolution. In: Heinz DJ (ed) Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, pp 7–84

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Hont A, Grivet L, Feldmann P, Rao S, Berding N, Glaszmann J-C (1996) Characterisation of the double genome structure of modern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp.) by molecular cytogenetics. Mol Gen Genet 250:405–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C (1995) teosinte branched 1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141:333–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doust AN, Devos KM, Gadberry MD, Gale MD, Kellog EA (2004) Genetic control of branching in foxtail millet. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9045–9050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard L, McSteen P, Doebley J, Hake S (2002) Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched 1 correlate with growth suppression in Maize and Teosinte. Genetics 162:1927–1935

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoarau J-Y, Grivet L, Offmann B, Raboin L-M, Diorflat J-P, Payet J, Hellmann M, D’Hont A, Glaszmann J-C (2002) Genetic dissection of a modern sugarcane cultivar (Saccharum spp.). II. Detection of QTLs for yield components. Theor Appl Genet 105:1027–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson PA (2005) Breeding for improved sugar content in sugarcane. Field Crops Res 92:277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lander E, Kruglyak L (1995) Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 11:241–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre CL, Jackson M, Cordeiro GM, Amouyal O, Hermann S, Aitken KS, Eliott F, Henry RJ, Casu RE, Bonnett GD (2006) The identification and characterisation of alleles of sucrose phosphate synthase gene family III in sugarcane. Mol Breed 18:39–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan SB, Gravois KA, Bischoff KP, Martin FA (1990) Crop effects on genetic relationships among sugarcane traits. Crop Sci 30:927–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming R, Liu S-C, Moore PH, Irvine JE, Paterson AH (2001) QTL analysis in a complex autopolyploid: genetic control of sugar content in sugarcane. Genome Res 11:2075–2084

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ming R, Wang Y-W, Draye X, Moore PH, Irvine JE, Paterson AH (2002) Molecular dissection of complex traits in autopolyploids: mapping QTLs affecting sugar yield and related traits in sugarcane. Theor Appl Genet 105:332–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roach BT (1984) Conservation and use of the genetic resources of sugarcane. Sugarcane 2:7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan TV, Ahloowalia BS, Heinz DJ (1987) Cytogenetics. In: Heinz DJ (ed) Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, pp 211–253

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many people helped collect the phenotypic data including the field staff from CSR, Michael Hewitt, John Foreman (CSIRO) and Graeme Holzberger (BSES Limited). This work was in part funded by SRDC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Aitken.

Additional information

Communicated by F. van Eeuwijk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aitken, K.S., Hermann, S., Karno, K. et al. Genetic control of yield related stalk traits in sugarcane. Theor Appl Genet 117, 1191–1203 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0856-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0856-6

Keywords

Navigation