Abstract
Maize silage is a significant energy source for animal production operations, and the efficiency of the conversion of forage into animal mass is an important consideration when selecting cultivars for use as feed. Fiber and lignin are negatively correlated with digestibility of feed, so the development of forage with reduced levels of these cell-wall components (CWCs) is desirable. While variability for fiber and lignin is present in maize germplasm, traditional selection has focused on the yield of the ear rather than the forage quality of the whole plant, and little information is available concerning the genetics of fiber and lignin. The objectives of this study were to map quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for fiber and lignin in the maize stalk and compare them with QTLs from other populations. Stalk samples were harvested from 191 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of B73 (an inbred line with low-to-intermediate levels of CWCs) × De811 (an inbred line with high levels of CWCs) at two locations in 1998 and one in 1999 and assayed for neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL). The QTLs were detected on nine chromosomes, mostly clustered in concordance with the high genetic correlations between NDF and ADF. Adjustment of NDF for ADF and ADF for ADL revealed that most of the variability for CWCs in this population is in ADF. Many of the QTLs detected in this study have also been detected in other populations, and several are linked to candidate genes for cellulose or starch biosynthesis. The genetic information obtained in this study should be useful to breeding efforts aimed at improving the quality of maize silage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin DF, Lee M, Veldboom LR, Hallauer AR (2000) Genetic mapping in maize with hybrid progeny across testers and generations: grain yield and grain moisture. Crop Sci 40:30–39
Beavis WD (1994) The power and deceit of QTL experiments: lessons from comparative QTL studies. In: ASTA (ed) 49th Annu Corn Sorghum Industry Res Conf. ASTA, Washington, D.C., pp 250–266
Beeghly HH, Coors JG, Lee M (1997) Plant fiber composition and resistance to European corn borer in four maize populations. Maydica 42:297–303
Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Jones RL (2000) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. ASPP, Rockville, Md.
Buendgen MR, Coors JG, Grombacher AW, Russell WA (1990) European corn borer resistance and cell wall composition of three maize populations. Crop Sci 30:505–510
Cardinal A, Lee M, Moore KJ (2003) Genetic mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting fiber and lignin content in maize. Theor Appl Genet 106:866–874
Causse M, Rocher J, Henry AM, Charcosset A, Prioul J, de Vienne D (1995a) Genetic dissection of the relationship between carbon metabolism and early growth in maize, with emphasis on key-enzyme loci. Mol Breed 1:259–272
Causse M, Rocher J, Pelleschi S, Barriére Y, de Vienne D, Prioul J (1995b) Sucrose phosphate synthase: an enzyme with heterotic activity correlated with maize growth. Crop Sci 35:995–1001
Causse M, Santoni S, Damerval C, Maurice A, Charcosset A, Deatrick J, de Vienne D (1996) A composite map of expressed sequences in maize. Genome 39:418–432
Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963–971
Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental designs, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Deinum B, Struik PC (1986) Improving the nutritive value of forage maize. In: Dolstra O, Miedema P (eds) Breed Silage Maize. Proc 13th Cong Maize Sorghum Sect EUCARPIA. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 77–90
Delmer DP, Amor Y (1995) Cellulose biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7:987–1000
Delmer DP, Haigler CH (2002) The regulation of metabolic flux to cellulose, a major sink for carbon in plants. Metab Eng 4:22–28
Fehr WR (ed) (1987) Principles of cultivar development. McGraw-Hill, New York
Ferret A, Casañas F, Verdú AM, Bosch L, Nuez F (1991) Breeding for yield and nutritive value in forage maize: an easy criterion for stover quality, and genetic analysis of Lancaster variety. Euphytica 53:61–66
Gaut BS (2001) Patterns of chromosomal duplication in maize and their implications for comparative maps of the grasses. Genome Res 11:55–66
Georges MD, Nielsen D, Mackinnon M, Mishra A, Okimoto R, Pasquino AT, Sargeant LS, Sorensen A, Steele MR, Zhoa Z, Womack JE, Hoeschele I (1995) Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics 139:907–920
Helentjaris T, Weber D, Wright S (1988) Identification of genomic locations of duplicate nucleotide sequences in maize by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Genetics 118:353–363
Holland JB (1998) epistacy: a SAS program for detecting two-locus epistatic interactions using genetic marker information. J Hered 89:374–375
Holland JB, Moser HS, O’Donoughue LS, Lee M (1997) QTLs and epistasis associated with vernalization responses in oat. Crop Sci 38:1306–1316
Holland N, Holland D, Helentjaris T, Dhugga KS, Xoconostle-Cazares B, Delmer DP (2000) A comparative analysis of the plant cellulose synthase (CesA) gene family. Plant Physiol 123:1313–1324
Hunt CW, Kezar W, Vinande R (1992) Yield, chemical composition, and ruminal fermentability of corn whole plant, ear, and stover as affected by hybrid. J Prod Agric 5:286–290
Hunter RB (1978) Selection and evaluation procedures for whole-plant corn silage. Can J Plant Sci 58:661–678
Jansen RC (1993) Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 135:205–211
Jansen RC, Stam P (1994) High resolution of quantitative traits with multiple loci via interval mapping. Genetics 136:1447–1455
Knapp SJ, Stroup WW, Ross WM (1985) Exact confidence intervals for heritability on a progeny mean basis. Crop Sci 25:192–194
Krakowsky MD, Beeghly HH, Coors JG, Lee M (2003) Characterization of quantitative trait loci affecting fiber and lignin in maize (Zea mays L). Maydica 48:283–292
Krakowsky MD, Lee M, Woodman-Clikeman WL, Long MJ, Sharpova N (2004) QTL mapping of resistance to stalk tunneling by the European corn borer in RILs of maize population B73 × De811. Crop Sci 44:274–282
Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199
Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln ES, Newburg L (1987) mapmaker: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181
Lübberstedt T, Melchinger AE, Klein D, Degenhardt H, Paul C (1997) QTL mapping in testcrosses of European flint lines of maize: II. Comparison of different testers for forage quality traits. Crop Sci 37:1913–1922
Lundvall JP, Buxton DR, George JR (1994) Forage quality variation among maize inbreds: in vitro digestibility and cell-wall components. Crop Sci 34:1672–1678
Méchin V, Argillier O, Hébert Y, Guingo E, Moreau L, Charcosset A, Barrière Y (2001) Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of cell wall digestibility and lignification in silage maize. Crop Sci 41:690–697
Mode CJ, Robinson HF (1959) Pleiotropism and the genetic variance and covariance. Biometrics 15:518–537
Ooijen JW van (1992) Accuracy of mapping quantitative trait loci in autogamous species. Theor Appl Genet 84:803–811
Papst C, Bohn M, Utz HF, Melchinger AE, Klein D, Eder J (2004) QTL mapping for European corn borer resistance (Ostrinia nubilalis Hb.), agronomic and forage quality traits of testcross progenies in early-maturing European maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 108:1545–1554
Preiss J (1982) Regulation of the biosynthesis and degradation of starch. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33:431–454
Prioul JL, Pelleschi S, Séne M, Thévenot C, Causse M, deVienne D, Leonardi A (1999) From QTLs for enzyme activity to candidate genes in maize. J Exp Bot 50:1281–1288
Robertson JB, van Soest PJ (1980) Detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In: James WPT, Theander O (eds) The analysis of dietary fiber in food. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 123–158
Roth LS, Marten GC, Compton WA, Stuthman DD (1970) Genetic variation of quality traits in maize (Zea mays L.) forage. Crop Sci 10:365–367
SAS Institute (1999) SAS OnlineDoc, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
Senior ML, Murphy JP, Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1996) Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. Crop Sci 38:1088–1098
Shanker A, Salazar RW, Taliercio EW, Chourey PS (1995) Cloning and characterization of full-length cDNA encoding cell-wall invertase from maize. Plant Physiol 108:873–4
van Soest PJ (1994) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Utz HF, Melchinger AE (1996) plabqtl: a program for composite interval mapping of QTL. JQTL 2:1
Veldboom LR, Lee M, Woodman W (1994) Molecular marker-facilitated studies in an elite maize population: I linkage analysis and determination of QTL for morphological traits. Theor Appl Genet 88:7–16
Visscher PM, Thompson R, Haley CS (1996) Confidence intervals in QTL mapping by bootstrapping. Genetics 143:1013–1020
Whetten R, Sederoff R (1998) Lignin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7:1001–1013
Wolf DP, Coors JG, Albrecht KA, Undersander DJ, Carter PR (1993) Forage quality of maize genotypes selected for extreme fiber concentrations. Crop Sci 33:1353–1359
Zeng Z (1994) Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136:1457–1468
Acknowledgments
The research reported here was carried out in partial fulfillment of the Ph.D. degree by M.D. Krakowsky. This journal paper of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa, Project No. 3134, was supported by Hatch Act and State of Iowa funds and The R.F. Baker Center for plant breeding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D.A. Hoisington
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krakowsky, M.D., Lee, M. & Coors, J.G. Quantitative trait loci for cell-wall components in recombinant inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.) I: stalk tissue. Theor Appl Genet 111, 337–346 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-2026-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-2026-4