Skip to main content
Log in

Breeding for yield and nutritive value in forage maize: An easy criterion for stover quality, and genetic analysis of Lancaster variety

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The maize populations BS13 (S2) C4 and Lancaster are compared with respect to their potential as forage maize. In light of the preliminary results, the Lancaster population was chosen for a more thorough study.

The determination of NDF gave a sufficiently precise estimate of the stover digestibility within our experimental conditions. The heritability of stover and grain production was 0.59 and 0.30, respectively, whilst that of the stover NDF was 0.32.

The additive genetic correlation between NDF and stover production, possibly attributable to the architecture of the plant, favours the selection of genotypes that produce more and better forage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts, J.V., B.L. DeBrabander, B.G. Cottyn, L.A. Carlier & F.X. Buysse 1977. Contribution à la determination de la valeur alimentaire des fourrages grossiers. V. Estimation de la digestibilité et de la valeur énergétique à l'aide des fractions de la paroi cellulaire et des ‘summatives equations‘ de Van Soest. Revue de l'Agriculture 30: 933–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrière, Y. & A. Gallais, 1986. Qu'attendre des variétés spécialisées? Un maïs ensilage n'est pas un maïs grain. Agromaïs 44: 87–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañas, S., L. Bosch & F. Casañas, 1987. Estimación de la digestibilidad en híbridos comerciales de maís de ciclo largo. ITEA 72: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R.E. & H.F. Robinson, 1948. The components of genetic variance in populations of biparental progenies and their use in estimating the average degree of dominance. Biometrics 4: 254–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deinum, B. & J.J. Bakker, 1981. Genetic differences in digestibility of forage maize hybrids. Netherlands Jour. Agric. Sci. 29: 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deinum, B. & P.C. Struik 1986. Improving the nutritive value of forage maize. In: O. Dolstra & P. Miedema, (Eds) Breeding of silage maize, pp 77–90. Pudoc Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, G.E., 1959. Techniques for research in quantitative animal genetics. In: Techniques and Procedures in Animal Production Research, pp. 57–105. NY Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci.

  • Dolstra, O., M.A. Jongmans & A.W. de Jong, 1987. Genetic variation for digestibility of cell-wall constituents in stalks and its relation to feeding value and various stalk traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Proc. XIV Congress Maize & Sorghum Section of Eucarpia. Nitra. Vol. 2: 394–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallais, A. & M. Pollacsek, 1975. Possibilités de sélection du maïs en tant que plante fourragère. Proceedings VIII Eucarpia Congress, pp. 68–76.

  • Gallais, A., M. Pollacsek & L. Huguet, 1976. Possibilités de sélection du maïs en tant que plante fourragère. Ann. Amélior. Plantes, 26 (4): 591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallais, A., P. Vincourt & J.C. Bertholleau, 1983. Etude de critères de sélection chez le maïs fourrage: héritabilités, corrélations génétiques et réponse attendue à la sélection. Agronomie 3 (8): 751–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A.R. & J.B. Miranda, 1981. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press. Ames, Iowa. 468pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, R.N., 1978. Selection and evaluation procedures for whole plant corn silage. Can. Jour. Plant. Sci. 58: 661–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter, L., 1986. Ideal type of forage maize (Zea mays L.). In: O. Dolstra & P. Miedema, (Eds) Breeding of silage maize, pp 123–130. Pudoc Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revee, E.C.R., 1955. The variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 11: 357–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A., 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15: 469–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, J.M.A. & R.A. Terry, 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld. Soc. 18: 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, P.J., 1963. Use of detergent in the analysis of fibrous feed. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. Journal of A.O.A.C. 46: 829–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, P.J., 1965. Comparison of two different equations for prediction of digestibility from cell contents, cell wall constituents and lignin content of acid detergent fiber. Jour. Dairy Sci. 48: 815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, P.J. & R.H. Wine, 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of A.O.A.C. 50: 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferret, A., Casañas, F., Verdú, A.M. et al. Breeding for yield and nutritive value in forage maize: An easy criterion for stover quality, and genetic analysis of Lancaster variety. Euphytica 53, 61–66 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032034

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032034

Key words

Navigation