Skip to main content
Log in

How floral odours are learned inside the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) nest

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recruitment in social insects often involves not only inducing nestmates to leave the nest, but also communicating crucial information about finding profitable food sources. Although bumblebees transmit chemosensory information (floral scent), the transmission mechanism is unknown as mouth-to-mouth fluid transfer (as in honeybees) does not occur. Because recruiting bumblebees release a pheromone in the nest that triggers foraging in previously inactive workers, we tested whether this pheromone helps workers learn currently rewarding floral odours, as found in food social learning in rats. We exposed colonies to artificial recruitment pheromone, paired with anise scent. The pheromone did not facilitate learning of floral scent. However, we found that releasing floral scent in the air of the colony was sufficient to trigger learning and that learning performance was improved when the chemosensory cue was provided in the nectar in honeypots; probably because it guarantees a tighter link between scent and reward, and possibly because gustatory cues are involved in addition to olfaction. Scent learning was maximal when anise-scented nectar was brought into the nest by demonstrator foragers, suggesting that previously unidentified cues provided by successful foragers play an important role in nestmates learning new floral odours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arenas A, Fernández VM, Farina WM (2007) Floral odor learning within the hive affects honeybees’ foraging decisions. Naturwissenschaften 94:218–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Mangel M (1986) The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor Popul Biol 40:45–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Brito Sanchez G, Ortigão-Farias JR, Gauthier M, Liu F, Giurfa M (2007) Taste perception in honeybees: just a taste of honey? Arthropod–Plant Interactions 1:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A, Chittka L (1999) Evolutionary origins of bee dances. Nature 401:38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A, Chittka L (2001) Food alert in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): possible mechanisms and evolutionary implications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:570–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A, Chittka L (2004) Information flow and regulation of foraging activity in bumble bees (Bombus spp.). Apidologie 35:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A, Brockman A, Chittka L (2003) Bumble bees alert to food with pheromone from tergal gland. J Comp Physiol A 189:47–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A, Klügl F, Oechslein C, Puppe F, Chittka L (2006) Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model. Behav Ecol 17:336–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina WM, Grüter C, Díaz PC (2005) Social learning of floral odours inside the honeybee hive. Proc R Soc B 272:1923–1928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galef BG, Wigmore SW (1983) Transfer of information concerning distant foods: a laboratory investigation of the ‘information-centre’ hypothesis. Anim Behav 31:748–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galef BG, Mason JR, Preti G, Bean NJ (1988) Carbon disulfide: a semiochemical mediating socially-induced diet choice in rats. Physiol Behav 42:119–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Núñez JA (1992) Honeybees mark with scent and reject recently visited flowers. Oecologia 89:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grüter C, Acosta LE, Farina WM (2006) Propagation of olfactory information within the honeybee hive. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:707–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heltne PG, Wojcik JF, Pook AG (1981) Goeldi’s monkey, genus Callimico. In: Coimbra-Filho AF, Mittermeier RA (eds) Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates. vol. 1. Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1970) Recruitment trails in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex badius. Psyche 77:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen HB, Kristjansson K, Rohde B, Terkildsen M, Olsen CE (1995) Can social bees be influenced to choose a specific feeding station by adding the scent of the station to the hive air? J Chem Ecol 21:1635–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd TM, Sherman PW (1996) Naked mole-rats recruit colony mates to food sources. Anim Behav 52:957–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater E, Chittka L (2007) Social learning in insects—from miniature brains to consensus building. Curr Biol 17:R703–R713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mena Granero A, Guerra Sanz JM, Egea González FJ, Martínez Vidal JL, Dornhaus A, Ghani J, Roldan Serrano A, Chittka L (2005) Chemical compounds of the foraging recruitment pheromone in bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 92:371–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molet M, Chittka L, Stelzer RJ, Streit S, Raine NE (2008) Colony nutritional status modulates worker responses to foraging recruitment pheromone in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1919–1926. doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0623-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham-Delègue MH, Roger B, Charles R, Masson C (1990) Effet d’une pré-exposition olfactive sur un comportement d’orientation en olfactomètre dynamique a quatre voies chez l’abeille (Apis mellifera L.). Insect Soc 37:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raine NE, Ings TC, Ramos-Rodriguez O, Chittka L (2006) Intercolony variation in learning performance of a wild British bumblebee population (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus terrestris audax). Entomol Gen 28:241–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson HM, Warr CG, Carlson JR (2003) Molecular evolution of the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:14537–14542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh N, Scott AG, Bryning GP, Chittka L (2007) Distinguishing signals and cues: bumblebees use general footprints to generate adaptive behaviour at flowers and nest. Arthropod–Plant Interactions 1:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoz JC, Laloi D, Odoux JF, Pham-Delègue MH (2000) Olfactory information transfer in the honeybee: compared efficiency of classical conditioning and early exposure. Anim Behav 59:1025–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vergoz V, Schreurs HA, Mercer AR (2007) Queen pheromone blocks aversive learning in young worker bees. Science 317:384–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1923) Über die “Sprache” der Bienen—Eine tierpsychologische Untersuchung. Zool Jahrb 40:1–186

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenner AM, Wells PH, Johnson DL (1969) Honey bee recruitment to food sources: olfaction or language? Science 164:84–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Syngenta Bioline Bees for supplying the bumblebee colonies, Hélène Müller, Oscar Ramos Rodríguez and Daniel Stollewerk for the help with experiments and colony maintenance and four anonymous referees for useful comments. This work was supported by a grant from the Natural Environment Research Council (NE/F523342/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathieu Molet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molet, M., Chittka, L. & Raine, N.E. How floral odours are learned inside the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) nest. Naturwissenschaften 96, 213–219 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0465-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0465-x

Keywords

Navigation