Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of cross-feeding anarchistic and wild type honey bees: anarchistic workers are not queen-like

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unlike normal (wild type) honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, 'anarchistic' colonies are characterised by workers that activate their ovaries in the presence of the queen and brood and by the ability of their workers to lay eggs that evade worker policing. In the Cape honey bee (A. m. capensis), female larvae can manipulate non-capensis nurse workers such that they receive more larval food and develop into worker-queen intermediates or intercastes. We speculated that, in anarchistic colonies, larvae might produce signals that result in excessive feeding of female larvae. Excessively fed female larvae may then develop into reproductively active workers. In this study we cross-fostered anarchistic and wild type brood and investigated the effect of cross-fostering on the amount of food fed to larvae and on the morphology of the resulting workers. We show that anarchistic larvae do not manipulate wild type nurse workers into feeding them more, nor do anarchistic workers develop into worker–queen intermediates. On the contrary, anarchistic larvae are fed less than wild type larvae and anarchistic workers seem to be poor nurses in that they feed larvae less, irrespective of brood genotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

References

  • Arnold G, LeConte Y, Trouiller J, Hervet H, Chappe B, Masson C (1994) Inhibition of worker honeybee ovaries development by a mixture of fatty acid esters from larvae. C R Acad Sci Ser III Sci Vie 317:511–515

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barron AB, Oldroyd BP (2001) Social regulation of ovary activation in 'anarchistic' honey-bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman M, Calis JNM, Boot WJ (2000) Parasitic honeybees get royal treatment. Nature 404:723

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetsma J (1979) The process of queen-worker differentiation in the honeybee. Bee World 60:24–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calis JNM, Boot WJ, Allsopp MH, Beekman M (2002) Getting more than a fair share: nutrition of worker larvae related to social parasitism in the Cape honey bee Apis mellifera capensis. Apidologie 33:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Châline N, Ratnieks FLW, Burke T (2002) Anarchy in the UK: detailed genetic analysis of worker reproduction in a naturally-occurring British anarchistic honeybee, Apis mellifera, colony using DNA microsatellites. Mol Ecol 11:1795–1803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammedi A, Paris A, Crauser D, LeConte Y (1998) Effect of aliphatic esters on ovary development of queenless bees (Apis mellifera L.). Naturwissenschaften 85:455–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montague CE, Oldroyd BP (1998) The evolution of worker sterility in honey bees: an investigation into a behavioral mutant causing failure of worker policing. Evolution 52:1408–1415

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Osborne KE (1999) The evolution of worker sterility in honeybees: the genetic basis of failure of worker policing. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1335–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Ratnieks FLW (2000) Evolution of worker sterility in honeybees (Apis mellifera): how anarchistic workers evade policing by laying eggs that have low removal rates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:268–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Smolenski AJ, Cornuet J-M, Crozier RH (1994) Anarchy in the beehive. Nature 371:749

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Halling L, Rinderer TE (1999) Development and behaviour of anarchistic honeybees. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1875–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Wossler TC, Ratnieks FLW (2001) Regulation of ovary activation in worker honey-bees (Apis mellifera): larval signal production and adult response thresholds differ between anarchistic and wild-type bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:366–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer KA, Oldroyd BP (2000) Evolution of multiple mating in the genus Apis. Apidologie 31:235–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Strassmann JE (1998) Kin selection and social insects. BioScience 48:165–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW (1993) Egg-laying, egg-removal, and ovary development by workers in queenright honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouiller J, Arnold G, LeConte Y, Masson C, Chappe B (1991) Temporal pheromonal and kairomonal secretion in the brood of honeybees. Naturwissenschaften 78:368–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Visscher PK (1996) Reproductive conflict in honey bees: a stalemate of worker egg-laying and policing. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Michael Duncan for his beekeeping assistance and the School of Biological Sciences for the use of the Crommelin Research Station. Financial support was obtained from an Australian Research Council grant to B.P.O.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madeleine Beekman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beekman, M., Oldroyd, B.P. Effects of cross-feeding anarchistic and wild type honey bees: anarchistic workers are not queen-like. Naturwissenschaften 90, 189–192 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-003-0406-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-003-0406-7

Keywords

Navigation