Skip to main content
Log in

Social regulation of ovary activation in ’anarchistic’ honey-bees (Apis mellifera)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract 

Honey-bee (Apis mellifera) colonies exhibit extreme reproductive division of labour. Workers almost always have inactive ovaries and the queen monopolises egg laying. Although extremely rare, ’anarchistic’ colonies exist in which workers produce male offspring despite the presence of the queen. By comparing the rates of ovary activation in anarchistic and wild-type bees fostered to host colonies of different genotype (i.e. anarchist and non-anarchist) and queen status (i.e. queenless and queenright), we investigated the factors involved in inhibiting ovary activation. Fostered anarchist workers always had a higher level of ovary development than fostered wild-type bees in both anarchist and non-anarchist host colonies. Fostered workers of both genotypes had more active ovaries in anarchistic than in wild-type hosts. Fostered workers of both strains also had more active ovaries in queenless than in queenright hosts. The results suggest that selection for worker reproduction in the anarchistic line has both reduced the effects of brood and queen pheromones on worker ovary inhibition and increased the likelihood that workers of the anarchistic line will develop ovaries compared to wild-type workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 14 June 2000 / Revised: 26 September 2000 / Accepted: 7 October 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barron, A., Oldroyd, B. Social regulation of ovary activation in ’anarchistic’ honey-bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49, 214–219 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000278

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000278

Navigation