Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional outcomes and perceived quality of life following fixation of femoral neck fractures in adults from 18 to 69 years using dynamic hip screw (DHS) and an additional anti-rotation screw- a retrospective analysis of 53 patients after a mean follow-up time of 4 years

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of the study was to explore the functional outcome after osteosynthesis with dynamic hip screw (DHS) for adults up to 69 years, and identify potential predictive indicators of either positive impact on quality of life or increase the incidence of complications.

Materials and methods

Out of 85 patients 53 could be contacted, 36 were followed up clinically and radiologically, 17 patients could be interviewed by phone. All fractures have been treated by osteosynthesis with DHS and one additional anti-rotation screw. Functional outcome and quality of life were measured with use of Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF 12). The mean values were compared to two random sample t tests and ANOVA for independent random samples. The connection between an aim variable and selected variables of influence was examined by regression analysis.

Results

The mean HHS showed good functional results with 88 points (median 95.6). Good or excellent results were achieved in 80.4% of cases. The current investigation also delivers promising results with regard to the complication rate: avascular femoral head necrosis (AVN) in 11.3% of cases (n = 6), 9.4% showed non-union (n = 5) and cut out (n = 3) occurred in 5.7%. A secondary conversion to hip arthroplasty (n = 7) had a strong negative impact on everyday life (HHS = 63.3 points, Physical Health Summary Score SF-12 = 34.9 points).

Conclusions

The results of this study are promising showing uncomplicated fracture healing in 84.9% of intracapsular femoral neck fractures and a low incidence of complications after osteosynthesis with DHS in patients aged up to 69 years. The quality of the fracture reduction achieved in the axial view and a small tip apex index after an osteosynthetically treated femoral neck fracture with DHS are significant predictive indicators for complications. Diabetes, age > 65 years, osteoporosis, ASA III may also be significant factors for worse results, but showed no statistical significance in our analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Nauclér E, et al (2019) The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2018. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

  2. Ma H-H, Chou T-FA, Tsai S-W, et al. Outcomes of internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with an undisplaced femoral neck fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:320. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1377-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gjertsen J-E, Fevang JM, Matre K, et al. Clinical outcome after undisplaced femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop. 2011;82:268–74. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.588857.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pauyo T, Drager J, Albers A, Harvey EJ. Management of femoral neck fractures in the young patient: A critical analysis review. World J Orthop. 2014;5:204–17. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lubovsky O, Liebergall M, Mattan Y, et al. Early diagnosis of occult hip fractures MRI versus CT scan. Injury. 2005;36:788–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2005.01.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Medda S, Snoap T, Carroll EA. Treatment of young femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(Suppl 1):S1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck system in unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures: a comparison with the dynamic hip screw and cannulated screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31:131–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. QS-Berichte. In: IQTIG. https://iqtig.org/qs-berichte/qualitaetsreport/. Accessed 9 Jun 2020

  9. Bonnaire F, Schaefer DJ, Kuner EH. Hemarthrosis and hip joint pressure in femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199808000-00017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson T, Bachrach-Lindström M, Aspenberg P, et al. The total costs of a displaced femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation and total hip replacement. A randomised study of 146 hips. Int Orthop. 2006;30:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0037-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mouzopoulos G, Stamatakos M, Arabatzi H, et al. The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options. Int Orthop. 2008;32:367–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0321-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deng J, Wang G, Li J, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures. OTA Int. 2021;4: e087. https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O, Sernbo I. A prospective randomised trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur. Functional outcome for 450 patients at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:183–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b2.11923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Davison JN, Calder SJ, Anderson GH, et al. Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. A prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:206–12. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.83b2.11128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ly TV, Swiontkowski MF. Management of femoral neck fractures in young adults. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42:3–12. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.38574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan DS. Femoral neck fractures in young patients: state of the art. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(Suppl 1):S7–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin S, Zhang C, Jin D. Combination of modified free vascularized fibular grafting and reverse Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) for the management of femoral neck nonunion in patients thirty years of age or younger. Injury. 2015;46:1551–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Banaszek D, Spence D, O’Brien P, Lefaivre K. Principles of valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy (VITO) after femoral neck nonunion. Adv Orthop. 2018;2018:5214273. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5214273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE. Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:15–25. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199401000-00003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogmark C, Kristensen MT, Viberg B, et al. Hip fractures in the non-elderly-Who, why and whither? Injury. 2018;49:1445–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Protzman RR, Burkhalter WE. Femoral-neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:689–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jain R, Koo M, Kreder HJ, et al. Comparison of early and delayed fixation of subcapital hip fractures in patients sixty years of age or less. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1605–12. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200209000-00013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guiot L, Spence S, Bradman H, et al. Outcomes following hip fractures in young adults. Orthop Proc. 2019;101B:8–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992X.2019.1.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parker MJ, Khan RJK, Crawford J, Pryor GA. Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. A randomised trial of 455 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1150–5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.13522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haidukewych GJ, Rothwell WS, Jacofsky DJ, et al. Operative treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients between the ages of fifteen and fifty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1711–6. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200408000-00015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Damany DS, Parker MJ, Chojnowski A. Complications after intracapsular hip fractures in young adults. A meta-analysis of 18 published studies involving 564 fractures. Injury. 2005;36:131–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuner EH, Lorz W, Bonnaire F. Femoral neck fractures in adults: joint sparing operations. I. Results of an AO collective study with 328 patients. Unfallchirurg. 1995;98:251–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Szita J, Cserháti P, Bosch U, et al. Intracapsular femoral neck fractures: the importance of early reduction and stable osteosynthesis. Injury. 2002;33(Suppl 3):C41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00330-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smektala R, Hahn S, Schräder P, et al. Medial hip neck fracture: influence of pre-operative delay on the quality of outcome. Results of data from the external in-hospital quality assurance within the framework of secondary data analysis. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113:287–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-009-1674-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Upadhyay A, Jain P, Mishra P, et al. Delayed internal fixation of fractures of the neck of the femur in young adults. A prospective, randomised study comparing closed and open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:1035–40. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b7.15047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Butt MF, Dhar SA, Gani NU, et al. Delayed fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures in younger adults. Injury. 2008;39:238–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Papakostidis C, Panagiotopoulos A, Piccioli A, Giannoudis PV. Timing of internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the final outcome. Injury. 2015;46:459–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hefley FG, Nelson CL, Puskarich-May CL. Effect of delayed admission to the hospital on the preoperative prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis associated with fractures about the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:581–3. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199604000-00012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yeranosian M, Horneff JG, Baldwin K, Hosalkar HS. Factors affecting the outcome of fractures of the femoral neck in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2013;95B:135–42. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.30161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Perez JV, Warwick DJ, Case CP, Bannister GC. Death after proximal femoral fracture–an autopsy study. Injury. 1995;26:237–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)90008-l.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Swiontkowski MF, Harrington RM, Keller TS, Van Patten PK. Torsion and bending analysis of internal fixation techniques for femoral neck fractures: the role of implant design and bone density. J Orthop Res. 1987;5:433–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100050316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Garden RS. Malreduction and avascular necrosis in subcapital fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1971;53:183–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Füchtmeier B, Hente R, Maghsudi M, Nerlich M. Repositioning femoral neck fracture in younger patients. Valgus or anatomic reposition? Unfallchirurg. 2001;104:1055–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130170020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bonnaire F, Weber A, Bösl O, et al. “Cutting out” in pertrochanteric fractures–problem of osteoporosis? Unfallchirurg. 2007;110:425–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-007-1248-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Henari S, Leonard M, Hamadto M, Cogley D. Review of a single contemporary femoral neck fracture fixation method in young patients. Orthopedics. 2011;34:171. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20110124-09.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Halvorson J. Reduction techniques for young femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(Suppl 1):S12–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1058–64. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199507000-00012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Andruszkow H, Frink M, Frömke C, et al. Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2347–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1636-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sedighi A, Sales JG, Alavi S. The prognostic value of tip-to-apex distance (TAD index) in intertrochanteric fractures fixed by dynamic hip screw. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2012;4: e32. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2012.e32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Krause PC, Braud JL, Whatley JM. Total hip arthroplasty after previous fracture surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46:193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2014.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bonnaire FA, Weber AT. Analysis of fracture gap changes, dynamic and static stability of different osteosynthetic procedures in the femoral neck. Injury. 2002;33(Suppl 3):C24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00328-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ni M, Sun W, Ye Y. Research progress of medial buttress plate assisted fixation for femoral neck fractures in young adults. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020;34:1454–7. https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202004141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Fülling.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fjeld, A., Fülling, T., Bula, P. et al. Functional outcomes and perceived quality of life following fixation of femoral neck fractures in adults from 18 to 69 years using dynamic hip screw (DHS) and an additional anti-rotation screw- a retrospective analysis of 53 patients after a mean follow-up time of 4 years. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 1893–1903 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01855-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01855-1

Keywords

Navigation