Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams

Statement from the DEGRO/DGMP working group stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery

ICRU-Bericht 91 über die Verschreibung, Aufzeichnung und Dokumentation von stereotaktischen Behandlungen mit kleinen Photonenfeldern

Stellungnahme der DEGRO/DGMP-Arbeitsgruppe Stereotaktische Strahlentherapie und Radiochirurgie

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) report 91 with the title “prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams” was published in 2017. This extensive publication covers different relevant aspects of stereotactic radiotherapy such as small field dosimetry, accuracy requirements for volume definition and planning algorithms, and the precise application of treatment by means of image guidance. Finally, recommendations for prescribing, recording and reporting are given.

Zusammenfassung

In 2017 wurde der Report 91 der International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) zur Verordnung und Dokumentation von stereotaktischen Bestrahlungen mit kleinen Photonenfeldern veröffentlicht. Die umfassende Publikation geht auf diverse relevante Aspekte der Stereotaxie ein, wie die Kleinfelddosimetrie, die Genauigkeitsanforderungen der Volumendefinition und der Planungsalgorithmen sowie die präzise Applikation der Bestrahlung mithilfe von Bildgebung. Schließlich werden Empfehlungen zu Verschreibung und Dosisdokumentation bei stereotaktischen Bestrahlungen gegeben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seuntjens J, Lartigau EF, Cora S et al (2014) ICRU report 91. Prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams. J ICRU 14(2):1–160

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones D (1993) ICRU report 50. Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy. J ICRU 26(1):1–72

    Google Scholar 

  3. Landberg T, Chavaudra J, Dobbs J (1999) ICRU report 62. Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement to ICRU report 50). J ICRU 32(1):1–52

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeLuca P, Jones D, Gahbauer R et al (2010) ICRU report 83. Prescribing, recording, and reporting intensity-modulated photon-beam therapy (IMRT). J ICRU 10(1):1–107

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Alheit H et al (2014) Definition of stereotactic body radiotherapy: principles and practice for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 190(1):26–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Dieckmann K et al (2017) ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on implementation and practice of stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripherally located early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 124(1):11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kocher M, Wittig A, Piroth MD et al (2014) Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases. A report of the DEGRO Working Group on Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 190(6):521–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sterzing F, Brunner TB, Ernst I et al (2014) Stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver tumors: principles and practical guidelines of the DEGRO Working Group on Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 190(10):872–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. International Atomic Energy Agency (2017) Dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy. IAEA technical reports series, vol 483

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deutsches Institut für Normung (2014) Klinische Dosimetrie – Teil 8: Dosimetrie kleiner Photonen-Bestrahlungsfelder. DIN 6809-8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zheng D, Zhu X, Zhang Q et al (2016) Target dose conversion modeling from pencil beam (PB) to Monte Carlo (MC) for lung SBRT. Radiat Oncol 11:83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Keall PJ, Mageras GS, Balter JM et al (2006) The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. Med Phys 33(10):3874–3900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D et al (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys 37(8):4078–4101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Halvorsen PH, Cirino E, Das IJ et al (2017) AAPM-RSS medical physics practice guideline 9.a. for SRS-SBRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18(5):10–21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Moustakis C, Blanck O, Ebrahimi F et al (2017) Planning benchmark study for SBRT of early stage NSCLC: results of the DEGRO Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 193(10):780–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lambrecht M, Melidis C, Sonke JJ et al (2016) Lungtech, a phase II EORTC trial of SBRT for centrally located lung tumours – a clinical physics perspective. Radiat Oncol 11:7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Andratschke N, Parys A, Stadtfeld S et al (2016) Clinical results of mean GTV dose optimized robotic guided SBRT for liver metastases. Radiat Oncol 11:74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Baumann R, Chan MKH, Pyschny F et al (2018) Clinical results of mean GTV dose optimized robotic guided SBRT for lung metastases. Front Oncol 8:171

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Brunner T, Nestle U, Adebahr S et al (2016) Simultaneous integrated protection: a new concept for high-precision radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 192(12):886–894

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Moustakis C, Blanck O, Ebrahimi F et al (2017) Time for standardization of SBRT planning through large scale clinical data and guideline-based approaches (In regard to Mancosu et al). Strahlenther Onkol 193(12):1068–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lebredonchel S, Lacornerie T, Rault E et al (2017) About the non-consistency of PTV-based prescription in lung. Phys Med 44:177–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rieber J, Abbassi-Senger N, Adebahr S et al (2017) Influence of institutional experience and technological advances on outcome of stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastatic lung disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98(3):511–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanadini-Lang S, Rieber J, Filippi AR et al (2017) Nomogram based overall survival prediction in stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligo-metastatic lung disease. Radiother Oncol 123(2):182–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Andratschke N, Alheid H, Allgäuer M et al (2018) The SBRT database initiative of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO): patterns of care and outcome analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver oligometastases in 474 patients with 623 metastases. BMC Cancer 18(1):283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Guckenberger M, Klement RJ, Allgäuer M et al (2013) Applicability of the linear-quadratic formalism for modeling local tumor control probability in high dose per fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 8(8):1050–1058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Klement RJ, Allgäuer M, Appold S et al (2014) Support vector machine-based prediction of local tumor control after stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88(3):732–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lotte Wilke PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

L. Wilke, N. Andratschke, O. Blanck, T.B. Brunner, S.E. Combs, A.-L. Grosu, C. Moustakis, D. Schmitt, W. Baus and M. Guckenberger declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Preprint was submitted to Strahlentherapie und Onkologie [1]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilke, L., Andratschke, N., Blanck, O. et al. ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams. Strahlenther Onkol 195, 193–198 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-018-1416-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-018-1416-x

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation