Skip to main content
Log in

Baseline status and dose to the penile bulb predict impotence 1 year after radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Baseline-Status und Dosis auf den Bulbus penis als Prädiktoren für Impotenz ein Jahr nach Radiotherapie bei Prostatakrebs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To assess the predictors of the onset of impotence 1 year after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Patients and methods

In a multi-centric prospective study, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire-based potency of 91 hormone-naïve and potent patients (IIEF1-5 > 11 before radiotherapy) was assessed. At the time of this analysis, information on potency 1 year after treatment was available for 62 of 91 patients (42 treated with hypofractionation: 2.35–2.65 Gy/fr, 70–74.2 Gy; 20 with conventional fractionation: 74–78 Gy). Prospectively collected individual information and Dmax/Dmean to the penile bulb were available; the corresponding 2 Gy-equivalent values (EQD2_max/EQD2_mean) were also considered. Predictors of 1‑year impotency were assessed through uni- and multi-variable backward logistic regression: The best cut-off values discriminating between potent and impotent patients were assessed by ROC analyses. The discriminative power of the models and goodness-of-fit were measured by AUC analysis and the Hosmer–Lemeshow (H&L) test.

Results

At 1‑year follow-up, 26 of 62 patients (42 %) became impotent. The only predictive variables were baseline IIEF1-5 values (best cut-off baseline IIEF1-5 ≥ 19), Dmax ≥ 68.5 Gy and EQD2_max ≥ 74.2 Gy. The risk of 1‑year impotence may be predicted by a two-variable model including baseline IIEF1-5 (OR: 0.80, p = 0.003) and EQD2_max ≥ 74.2 Gy (OR: 4.1, p = 0.022). The AUC of the model was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64–0.87, p = 0.0007, H&L: p = 0.62).

The 1‑year risk of impotency after high-dose radiotherapy in potent men depends on the EQD2_max to the penile bulb and on baseline IIEF1-5 values.

Conclusion

A significant reduction in the risk may be expected mainly when sparing the bulb in patients with no/mild baseline impotency (IIEF1-5 > 17).

Zusammenfassung

Ziele

Beurteilung von Prädiktoren für das Auftreten von Impotenz 1 Jahr nach Radiotherapie bei Prostatakrebs.

Patienten und Methoden

In einer multizentrischen prospektiven Studie wurde mithilfe des IIEF(International Index of Erectile Function)-Fragebogens die Potenz von 91 hormonnaiven und potenten Patienten (IIEF1-5 > 11 vor Radiotherapie) bewertet. Zum Zeitpunkt dieser Analyse waren Informationen über die Potenz von 62/91 Patienten ein Jahr nach der Behandlung verfügbar (42 hypofraktioniert behandelt: 2,35–2,65 Gy/fr; 70–74,2 Gy; 20 konventionell: 74–78 Gy). Prospektiv erhobene individuelle Informationen und Dmax/Dmean am Bulbus penis waren verfügbar, ebenfalls berücksichtigt wurden die entsprechenden 2 Gy-äquivalent Werte (EQD2_max/EQD2_mean).

Prädiktoren der 1‑Jahres-Impotenz wurden durch uni- und multivariable rückwärtsgerichtete logistische Regression beurteilt, die besten Cut-off-Werte zur Potent-impotent-Unterscheidung durch ROC-Analysen. Die diskriminative Power der Modelle und die Anpassungsgüte wurden mithilfe der AUC und dem Hosmer–Lemeshow-Test bestimmt.

Ergebnisse

Bei der Kontrolle nach einem Jahr waren 26/62 Patienten (42 %) impotent. Die einzigen Vorhersagevariablen waren Baseline IIEF1-5 (bester Cut-off IIEF1-5 ≥ 19), Dmax ≥ 68,5 Gy und EQD2_max ≥ 74,2 Gy. Das Risiko für das Auftreten von Impotenz nach einem Jahr lässt sich durch ein 2‑Variablen-Modell (Baseline IIEF1-5 [OR: 0,80; p = 0,003] und EQD2_max ≥ 74,2 Gy [OR: 4,1; p = 0,022]) vorhersagen (AUC 0,77 [95%-KI: 0,64–0,87; p = 0,0007, H‑L-Test: p = 0,62]). Das Impotenzrisiko ein Jahr nach hochdosierter Radiotherapie hängt ab von EQD2_max im Bulbus penis und vom Baseline IIEF1-5.

Schlussfolgerung

Eine signifikante Risikoreduktion ist v.a. zu erwarten bei Schonung des Bulbus bei Potenz bzw. nur schwacher Impotenz zu Behandlungsbeginn (IIEF1-5 > 17).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Incrocci L (2006) Sexual function after external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: what do we know? Crit Rev Oncol Hemat 57:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roach MIII, Nam J, Gagliardi G (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects and the penile bulb. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(Suppl1):S130–S134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Alemozaffar M, Regan MM, Cooperberg MR (2011) Prediction of erectile function following treatment of prostate cancer. JAMA 306:1205–1213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ong WL, Hindson BR, Beaufort C (2014) Long-term erectile function following permament seed barchytherapy treatment for localized prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 112:72–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johannes CB, Araujo AB, Feldman HA (2000) Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Urol 163:460–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldstein I, Feldman MI, Deckers PJ (1984) Radiation-associated impotence. A clinical study of its mechanism. JAMA 251:903–910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van der Wielen GJ, Mulhall JP, Incrocci L (2007) Erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for prostate cancer and radiation dose to penile structures: a critical review. Radiother Oncol 84:107–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson JW, Moritz S, Fung T (2002) Meta-analysis of rates of erectile function after treatment of localized prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:1063–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siglin J, Kubicek GJ, Leiby B et al (2010) Time of decline of sexual function atfer external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:31–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiorino C, Valdagni R, Rancati T, Sanguineti G (2009) Dose-volume effects for normal tissues in external radiotherapy: pelvis. Radiother Oncol 93:153–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Perna L, Cozzarini C, Maggiulli E (2011) Inter-observer variability in contouring the penile bulb on CT images for prostate cancer treatment planning. Radiat Oncol 6:123

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Carillo V, Cozzarini C, Rancati T (2014) Relationships between bladder dose-volume/surface histograms and acute urinary toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 111:100–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano N 3rd (2002) The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res 14:226–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wallner KE, Merrick GS, Benson ML (2002) Penile bulb imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:928–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carillo V, Cozzarini C, Perna L (2012) Contouring variability of the penile bulb on CT images: Quantitative assessment using a generalized concordance index. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:841–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zelefsky MJ, Eid JF (1998) Elucidating the etiology of erectile dysfunction after definitive therapy for prostatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:129–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mulhall J, Ahmed A, Parker M, Mohideen N (2005) The hemodynamics of erectile dysfunction following external beam radiation for prostate cancer. J Sex Med 2:432–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Long ER, De Long DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristics curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fisch BM, Pickett B, Weinberg V (2001) Dose of radiation received by the bulb of the penis correlates with risk of impotence after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Urology 57:955–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roach M, Winter K, Michalski JM (2004) Penile bulb dose and impotence after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer on RTOG 9406: findings from a prospective, multi-institutional, phase I/IIdose-escalation study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:1351–1356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wernicke AG, Valicenti R, Di Eva K (2004) Radiation dose delivered to the proximal penis as a predictor of the risk of erectile dysfunction after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:1357–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mangar SA, Sydes MR, Tucker HL (2006) Evaluating the relationship between erectile dysfunction and dose received by the penile bulb: Using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 80:355–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Magli A, Giangreco M, Crespi M (2012) Erectile dysfunction after prostate three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy: correlation with the dose to the penile bulb. Strahlenter Onkol 188:997–1002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Selek U, Cheng R, Lii M (2004) Erectile dysfunction and radiation dose to the penile base structures: a lack of correlation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:1039–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown MW, Brooks JP, Albert PS (2007) An analysis of erectile function after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate carcinoma. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10:189–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Wielen GJ, van Putten WLJ, Incrocci L (2007) Sexual function after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from a dose-escalation trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:479–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wiegner E, King C (2010) Sexual function after stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from a prospective clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:442–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rivin del Campo E, Thomas K, Weinberg V (2013) Erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a model assessing the conflicting literature on dose-volume effects. Int J Impotence Res 25:161–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoppe BS, Nichols RC, Henderson RH (2012) Erectile function, incontinence and other quality of life outcomes following proton therapy for prostate cancer in men 60 years old and younger. Cancer 118:4619–4626

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Perna L, Fiorino C, Cozzarini C (2009) Sparing the penile bulb in the radical irradiation of clinically localized prostate carcinoma: a comparison between MRI and CT prostatic apex definition in 3DCRT, Linac-IMRT and helical Tomotherapy. Radiother Oncol 93:57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Broderick GA (1998) Evidence based assessment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 10(Suppl 2):S64–S73 (discussion S77-S79)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Keller LMM, Buyyounouski MK, Sopka D (2012) Stamp test delivers message on erectile dysfunction after high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Urology 80:337–342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Krauss D, Kestin L, Ye H (2011) Lack of benefit for the addition of androgen deprivation therapy to dose-escalated radiotherapy in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80:1064–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC-IG13090). We acknowledge Cinzia Bianconi for data management and Frank Bagg for the language revision. Tiziana Rancati is supported by a grant from Fondazione Monzino.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Fiorino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

C. Cozzarini, T. Rancati, F. Badenchini, F. Palorini, B. Avuzzi, C. Degli Esposti, G. Girelli, I. Improta, V. Vavassori, R. Valdagni, and C. Fiorino state that there are no conflicts of interest.

All studies on humans described in the present manuscript were carried out with the approval of the responsible ethics committee and in accordance with national law and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (in its current, revised form). Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in studies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cozzarini, C., Rancati, T., Badenchini, F. et al. Baseline status and dose to the penile bulb predict impotence 1 year after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 192, 297–304 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-0964-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-0964-1

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation