Skip to main content
Log in

The Erlangen Dose Optimization Trial for radiotherapy of benign painful shoulder syndrome

Long-term results

Die Erlanger Dosisoptimierungsstudie zur Strahlentherapie beim benignen schmerzhaften Schultersyndrom

Langzeitergebnisse

  • Original article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 26 April 2014

Abstract

Background and purpose

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of pain reduction by two dose-fractionation schedules for radiotherapy of painful shoulder syndrome.

Patients and methods

Between February 2006 and February 2010, 312 evaluable patients were recruited for this prospective trial. All patients received low-dose orthovoltage radiotherapy. One course consisted of 6 fractions in 3 weeks. In the case of insufficient pain remission after 6 weeks, a second course was administered. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups to receive single doses of either 0.5 or 1.0 Gy. Endpoint was pain reduction. Pain was measured before radiotherapy, as well as immediately after (early response), 6 weeks after (delayed response) and approximately 3 years after (long-term response) completion of radiotherapy using a questionnaire-based visual analogue scale (VAS) and a comprehensive pain score (CPS).

Results

Median follow-up was 35 months (range 11–57). The overall early, delayed and long-term response rates for all patients were 83, 85 and 82 %, respectively. The mean VAS scores before treatment and those for early, delayed and long-term response in the 0.5- and 1.0-Gy groups were 56.8 ± 23.7 and 53.2 ± 21.8 (p = 0.16); 38.2 ± 36.1 and 34.0 ± 24.5 (p = 0.19); 33.0 ± 27.2 and 23.7 ± 22.7 (p = 0.04) and 27.9 ± 25.8 and 32.1 ± 26.9 (p = 0.25), respectively. The mean CPS values before treatment and those for early, delayed and long-term response were 9.7 ± 3.0 and 9.5 ± 2.7 (p = 0.31); 6.1 ± 3.6 and 5.4 ± 3.6 (p = 0.10); 5.3 ± 3.7 and 4.1 ± 3.7 (p = 0.05) and 4.0 ± 3.9 and 5.3 ± 4.4 (p = 0.05), respectively. No significant differences in the quality of the long-term response were found between the 0.5- and 1.0-Gy arms (p = 0.28).

Conclusion

Radiotherapy is an effective treatment for the management of benign painful shoulder syndrome. For radiation protection reasons, the dose for a radiotherapy series should not exceed 3.0 Gy.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Untersuchung der Langzeiteffektivität zweier Dosisfraktionierungskonzepte bei der Strahlentherapie von Patienten mit schmerzhaftem Schultersyndrom.

Patienten und Methoden

Zwischen 2006 und 2010 wurden 312 auswertbare Patienten in diese prospektive und randomisierte Phase-IV-Studie eingeschlossen. Alle Patienten erhielten die Bestrahlung in niedrigdosierter Orthovolt-Technik. Eine Bestrahlungsserie bestand aus 6 Fraktionen/3 Wochen. Bei ungenügendem Ansprechen der Schmerzsymptomatik nach 6 Wochen wurde eine zweite Bestrahlungsserie durchgeführt. Die Patienten wurden auf die beiden Studienarme randomisiert und erhielten je nach Ergebnis Einzeldosen von 0,5 bzw. 1,0 Gy. Der Endpunkt der vorliegenden Analyse war die Schmerzreduktion. Die Schmerzintensität wurde vor, direkt nach („early response“), 6 Wochen nach („delayed response“) sowie etwa 3 Jahre nach der Strahlentherapie („long-term response“) mittels visueller Analogskala (VAS) und einem umfassenden Schmerzscore (CPS) gemessen.

Ergebnisse

Die mediane Nachbeobachtungszeit für Langzeitevaluation betrug 35 Monate (Spanne 11–57 Monate). Die Raten für das frühe, verzögerte und Langzeitansprechen aller Patienten betrugen 83, 85 und 82 %. Die mittleren VAS-Werte vor Behandlung sowie für das frühe, verzögerte und das Langzeitansprechen waren für die 0,5-Gy- und die 1,0-Gy-Gruppe jeweils 56,8 ± 23,7 und 53,2 ± 21,8 (p = 0,16), 38,2 ± 36,1 und 34,0 ± 24,5 (p = 0,19), 33,0 ± 27,2 und 23,7 ± 22,7 (p = 0,04) sowie 27,9 ± 25,8 und 32,1 ± 26,9 (p = 0,25). Die entsprechenden mittleren CPS-Werte vor Behandlung sowie für das frühe, verzögerte und das Langzeitansprechen betrugen jeweils 9,7 ± 3,0 und 9,5 ± 2,7 (p = 0,31), 6,1 ± 3,6 und 5,4 ± 3,6 (p = 0,10), 5,3 ± 3,7 und 4,1 ± 3,7 (p = 0,05) sowie 4,0 ± 3,9 und 5,3 ± 4,4 (p = 0,05). Zwischen den beiden Studienarmen konnten keinerlei statistisch signifikante Unterschiede in der Qualität des Langzeitansprechens festgestellt werden (p = 0,28).

Schlussfolgerung

Die Strahlentherapie ist langfristig eine effektive Maßnahme zur Behandlung des schmerzhaften Schultersyndroms. Aus Strahlenschutzgründen sollte eine Gesamtdosis von 3 Gy pro Bestrahlungsserie nicht überschritten werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Bridgman JF (1972) Periarthritis of the shoulder and diabetes mellitus. Ann Rheum Dis 31:69–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hand C, Clipsham K, Rees JL, Carr AJ (2008) Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:231–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolf JM, Green A (2002) Influence of comorbidity on self-assessment instrument scores of patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1167–1173

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ott OJ, Hertel S, Gaipl US et al (2012) Benign painful elbow syndrome. First results of a single center prospective randomized radiotherapy dose optimization trial. Strahlenther Onkol 188:873–877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ott OJ, Jeremias C, Gaipl US et al (2013) Radiotherapy for calcaneodynia. Results of a single center prospective randomized dose optimization trial. Strahlenther Onkol 189:329–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ott OJ, Jeremias C, Gaipl US et al (2013) Radiotherapy for achillodynia: results of a single-center prospective randomized dose-optimization trial. Strahlenther Onkol 189:142–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seegenschmiedt MH, Keilholz L (1998) Epicondylopathia humeri (EPH) and peritendinitis humeroscapularis (PHS): evaluation of radiation therapy long-term results and literature review. Radiother Oncol 47:17–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ott OJ, Hertel S, Gaipl US et al (2012) Benign painful shoulder syndrome: initial results of a single-center prospective randomized radiotherapy dose-optimization trial. Strahlenther Onkol 188:1108–1113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heyd R, Schopohl B, Kirchner J et al (1997) Radiotherapy of epicondylopathy of the humerus. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 122:247–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schafer U, Micke O, Heinrich Seegenschmiedt M, Mucke R (2010) Correspondence (letter to the editor): low-dose radiotherapy. Dtsch Arztebl Int 107:603–604

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Niewald M, Fleckenstein J, Naumann S, Ruebe C (2007) Long-term results of radiotherapy for periarthritis of the shoulder: a retrospective evaluation. Radiat Oncol 2:34

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodel F, Frey B, Gaipl U et al (2012) Modulation of inflammatory immune reactions by low-dose ionizing radiation: molecular mechanisms and clinical application. Curr Med Chem 19:1741–1750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lodermann B, Wunderlich R, Frey S et al (2012) Low dose ionising radiation leads to a NF-kappaB dependent decreased secretion of active IL-1beta by activated macrophages with a discontinuous dose-dependency. Int J Radiat Biol (Epub ahead of print)

  14. Pannewitz G von (o J) Degenerative Erkrankungen. In Diethelm I, Heuck F, Olsson O, Rauninger K, Strnad F, Vieten H, Zuppinger A (Hrsg) Handbuch der medizinischen Radiologie, Bd 17. Springer, Berlin, S 73–107

  15. Heyd R, Tselis N, Ackermann H et al (2007) Radiation therapy for painful heel spurs: results of a prospective randomized study. Strahlenther Onkol 183:3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Trott KR, Kamprad F (2006) Estimation of cancer risks from radiotherapy of benign diseases. Strahlenther Onkol 182:431–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (GREWIS, 02NUK017G) and the European Commission (DoReMi, European Network of Excellence, contract number 249689).

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest. O. Ott, S. Hertel, U.S. Gaipl, B. Frey, M. Schmidt and R. Fietkau state that there are no conflicts of interest.

All studies on humans described in the present manuscript were carried out with the approval of the responsible ethics committee and in accordance with national law and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (in its current, revised form). Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O.J. Ott.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-014-0679-0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ott, O., Hertel, S., Gaipl, U. et al. The Erlangen Dose Optimization Trial for radiotherapy of benign painful shoulder syndrome. Strahlenther Onkol 190, 394–398 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-013-0520-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-013-0520-1

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation