Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simultaneous neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for locally advanced rectal cancer

Treatment outcome outside clinical trials

Simultane neoadjuvante Radiochemotherapie mit Capecitabin und Oxaliplatin beim lokal fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinom

Therapieergebnisse außerhalb klinischer Studien

  • Original article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Phase II trials of neoadjuvant treatment in UICC-TNM stage II and III rectal cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin demonstrated favourable rates on tumour regression with acceptable toxicity.

Patients and methods

Retrospective evaluation of 34 patients treated from 2005–2008 outside clinical trials (CTR) with neoadjuvant irradiation (45–50.4 Gy) and simultaneous capecitabine 825 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1–14 and 22–35 and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 (CAPOX). Twenty-six (77%) patients received one or two courses of capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1–14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 (XELOX) prior to simultaneous chemoradiotherapy.

Results

UICC-TNM stage regression was observed in 60% (n = 20). Dworak’s regression grades 3 and 4 were achieved in 18.2% (n = 6) and 15.1% (n = 5) of the patients. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 53% (n = 8) of patients with a tumour of the lower rectum. Within the mean observation of 24 months, none of the patients relapsed locally, 1 patient had progressive disease and 5 patients (15%) relapsed distantly. Toxicity of grade 3 and 4 was mainly diarrhoea 18% (n = 6) and perianal pain 9% (n = 3). Nevertheless, severe cardiac events (n = 2), severe electrolyte disturbances (n = 2), and syncopes (n = 2) were observed as well.

Conclusion

Treatment efficacy and common toxicity are similar to the reports of phase I/II trials. However, several severe adverse events were observed in our cohort study. The predisposing factors for these events have yet to be studied and may have implications for the selection of patients outside CTR.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Phase-II-Studien zur neoadjuvanten Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms (UICC-TNM-Stadium II und III) mit Capecitabin und Oxaliplatin zeigten eine günstige Tumorregressionsrate bei akzeptabler Toxizität.

Patienten und Methoden

Retrospektive Auswertung der Daten von 34 Patienten (Nachsorge Tab. 1, Patientencharakteristika Tab. 2), die in den Jahren 2005–2008 außerhalb klinischer Studien eine neoadjuvante Strahlentherapie (45–50,4 Gy) simultan mit Capecitabin 825 mg/m2 2-mal täglich an den Tagen 1–14 und 22–35 und Oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 an den Tagen 1, 8, 22 und 29 (CAPOX) erhielten. 26 (77%) Patienten bekamen 1–2 Zyklen Capecitabin 1000 mg/m2 2-mal täglich an den Tagen 1–14 und Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 am Tag 1 (XELOX) vor der simultanen Chemoradiotherapie.

Ergebnisse

Eine Regression des UICC-TNM-Stadiums wurde bei 60% (n = 20) beobachtet (Tab. 3). Regressionsgrade 3 und 4 nach Dworak wurden in 18,2% (n = 6) und 15,1% (n = 5) der Patienten erreicht (Tab. 4). Eine sphinktererhaltende Operation wurde in 53% (n = 8) der Patienten mit einem distalen Tumor realisiert. Innerhalb der Beobachtungszeit von 24 Monaten erlitt keiner der Patienten einen lokalen Rückfall. Eine Patientin zeigte eine kontinuierliche Tumorprogression und 5 Patienten (15%) entwickelten Fernmetastasen im Verlauf. Toxizität (Tab. 5) vom Grad (G) 3/4 manifestierte sich überwiegend als Diarrhoe 18% (n = 6) und perianaler Schmerz 9% (n = 3). Es traten jedoch 2 schwerwiegende kardiale Ereignisse, 2 Fälle von schwerer Elektrolytentgleisung und 2 Synkopen auf.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Effektivität und die allgemeine Toxizität in unserem Patientengut sind den Ergebnissen aus den Phase-I/II-Studien ähnlich. Es traten jedoch einzelne schwerwiegende Nebenwirkungen in unserer Kohorte auf. Die hierzu beitragenden Faktoren bedürfen einer weiteren Beobachtung und können Konsequenzen für die künftige Patientenselektion haben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ang C, Kornbluth M, Thirlwell MP et al (2010) Capecitabine-induced cardiotoxicity: case report and review of the literature. Curr Oncol 17:59–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S et al (2011) Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29:2773–2780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Basso M, Cassano A, Modoni A et al (2008) A reversible coma after oxaliplatin administration suggests a pathogenetic role of electrolyte imbalance. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 64:739–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bekelman JE, Shah A, Hahn SM (2011) Implications of comparative effectiveness research for radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol 1:72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonnen M, Crane C, Vauthey JN et al (2004) Long-term results using local excision after preoperative chemoradiation among selected T3 rectal cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:1098–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boulis-Wassif S, Gerard A, Loygue J et al (1984) Final results of a randomized trial on the treatment of rectal cancer with preoperative radiotherapy alone or in combination with 5-fluorouracil, followed by radical surgery. Trial of the European Organization on Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. Cancer 53:1811–1818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Braendengen M, Tveit KM, Berglund A et al (2008) Randomized phase III study comparing preoperative radiotherapy with chemoradiotherapy in nonresectable rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3687–3694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cassidy J, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E et al (2008) Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:2006–2012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chua YJ, Barbachano Y, Cunningham D et al (2010) Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined poor-risk rectal cancer: a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:241–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cividalli A, Ceciarelli F, Livdi E et al (2002) Radiosensitization by oxaliplatin in a mouse adenocarcinoma: influence of treatment schedule. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52:1092–1098

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gramont A de, Figer A, Seymour M et al (2000) Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2938–2947

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Paoli A, Chiara S, Luppi G et al (2006) Capecitabine in combination with preoperative radiation therapy in locally advanced, resectable, rectal cancer: a multicentric phase II study. Ann Oncol 17:246–251

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dunst J, Debus J, Rudat V et al (2008) Neoadjuvant capecitabine combined with standard radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: mature results of a phase II trial. Strahlenther Onkol 184:450–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:19–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eich HT, Stepien A, Zimmermann C et al (2011) Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery for advanced rectal cancer: prognostic significance of tumor regression. Strahlenther Onkol 187:225–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fels F, Kraft JW, Grabenbauer GG (2010) Geriatrics and radiation oncology. Part 1: How to identify high-risk patients and basic treatment principles. Strahlenther Onkol 186:411–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernandez-Martos C, Pericay C, Aparicio J et al (2010) Phase II, randomized study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with induction CAPOX followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in magnetic resonance imaging-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer: Grupo cancer de recto 3 study. J Clin Oncol 28:859–865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman NJ, Costanza ME (1988) 5-Fluorouracil-associated cardiotoxicity. Cancer 61:36–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S et al (2010) Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol 28:1638–1644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gerard JP, Chapet O, Nemoz C et al (2003) Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer with high-dose radiation and oxaliplatin-containing regimen: the Lyon R0–04 phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 21:1119–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Maughan TS et al (2006) A phase I dose escalation study of continuous oral capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and pelvic radiation (XELOX-RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 17:50–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guillem JG, Diaz-Gonzalez JA, Minsky BD et al (2008) cT3N0 rectal cancer: potential overtreatment with preoperative chemoradiotherapy is warranted. J Clin Oncol 26:368–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Sabbaga J et al (2009) Increasing the rates of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal cancer: results of a prospective study using additional chemotherapy during the resting period. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1927–1934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TH et al (2007) Comparison of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and capecitabine in preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67:378–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Koeberle D, Burkhard R, Moos R von et al (2008) Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin given prior to and concurrently with preoperative pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Br J Cancer 98:1204–1209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kosmas C, Kallistratos MS, Kopterides P et al (2008) Cardiotoxicity of fluoropyrimidines in different schedules of administration: a prospective study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 134:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuchenmeister U, Kirchner R, Mellert J et al (2000) First results of neoadjuvant simultaneious radiochemotherapy in advanced rectal carcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol 176:560–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Machiels JP, Duck L, Honhon B et al (2005) Phase II study of preoperative oxaliplatin, capecitabine and external beam radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: the RadiOxCape study. Ann Oncol 16:1898–1905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marquardt F, Rodel F, Capalbo G et al (2009) Molecular targeted treatment and radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 185:371–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ng M, Cunningham D, Norman AR (2005) The frequency and pattern of cardiotoxicity observed with capecitabine used in conjunction with oxaliplatin in patients treated for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Eur J Cancer 41:1542–1546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ofner D, Devries AF, Schaberl-Moser R et al (2011) Preoperative oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and external beam radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, primary pperable, cT(3)NxM0, low rectal cancer: a Phase II study. Strahlenther Onkol 187(2):100–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodel C, Arnold D, Becker H et al (2010) Induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: is it time for a randomized phase III trial? Strahlenther Onkol 186:658–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rodel C, Fietkau R, Keilholz L et al (1997) The acute toxicity of the simultaneous radiochemotherapy of rectal carcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol 173:415–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rodel C, Grabenbauer GG, Papadopoulos T et al (2003) Phase I/II trial of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:3098–3104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rodel C, Liersch T, Hermann RM et al (2007) Multicenter phase II trial of chemoradiation with oxaliplatin for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:110–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rodel C, Sauer R (2007) Integration of novel agents into combined-modality treatment for rectal cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 183:227–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sawada N, Ishikawa T, Sekiguchi F et al (1999) X-ray irradiation induces thymidine phosphorylase and enhances the efficacy of capecitabine (Xeloda) in human cancer xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 5:2948–2953

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Schmiegel W, Pox C, Reinacher-Schick A et al (2010) S3 guidelines for colorectal carcinoma: results of an evidence-based consensus conference on February 6/7, 2004 and June 8/9, 2007 (for the topics IV, VI and VII). Z Gastroenterol 48:65–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Trotti A, Byhardt R, Stetz J et al (2000) Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. An improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:13–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Cutsem E, Hoff PM, Blum JL et al (2002) Incidence of cardiotoxicity with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is typical of that reported with 5-fluorouracil. Ann Oncol 13:484–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J et al (2001) Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wolff HA, Gaedcke J, Jung K et al (2010) High-grade acute organ toxicity during preoperative radiochemotherapy as positive predictor for complete histopathologic tumor regression in multimodal treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 186:30–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wolff HA, Hennies S, Herrmann MK et al (2011) Comparison of the micronucleus and chromosome aberration techniques for the documentation of cytogenetic damage in radiochemotherapy-treated patients with rectal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 187:52–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, accessed 23 February 2012

Download references

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Zimmermann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winkler, J., Zipp, L., Knoblich, J. et al. Simultaneous neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for locally advanced rectal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 188, 377–382 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0073-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0073-8

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation